Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To compare Johnson-Toshach’s method and ultrasonography in estimating fetal weight in term pregnant women. Design: Descriptive, comparative, prospective, longitudinal study. Institution: Hospital Regional de Cajamarca, Cajamarca, Peru. Participants: Term pregnant women. Methods: Uterine h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Rodríguez Castañeda, Cristian José, Quispe Cuba, Juan Carlos
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2014
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/138
Enlace del recurso:http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/138
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVSPOG_d41b58a92b7c0ad0bb3ffdb99288c370
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/138
network_acronym_str REVSPOG
network_name_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository_id_str .
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital
Comparación del método de Johnson-Toshach y la ultra sonografía para estimar el ponderado fetal en gestantes a término asistidas en el Hospital Regional de Cajamarca
title Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital
spellingShingle Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital
Rodríguez Castañeda, Cristian José
title_short Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital
title_full Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital
title_fullStr Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital
title_sort Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rodríguez Castañeda, Cristian José
Quispe Cuba, Juan Carlos
author Rodríguez Castañeda, Cristian José
author_facet Rodríguez Castañeda, Cristian José
Quispe Cuba, Juan Carlos
author_role author
author2 Quispe Cuba, Juan Carlos
author2_role author
description Objective: To compare Johnson-Toshach’s method and ultrasonography in estimating fetal weight in term pregnant women. Design: Descriptive, comparative, prospective, longitudinal study. Institution: Hospital Regional de Cajamarca, Cajamarca, Peru. Participants: Term pregnant women. Methods: Uterine height was measured and fetal weight was estimated by Johnson-Toshach’s formula in 236 pregnant women 37-41 weeks. Subsequently, an obstetric ultrasound was performed in the same women to determine the fetal weight according Hadlock´s 2 formula. Delivery was expected within 48 hours; then the weight of the newborn was obtained. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 19 statistical package, student t and McNemar tests with p<0.05 significance. Main outcome measures: Fetal weight. Results: Fetal weight estimated by Johnson-Toshach’s method was more accurate than that calculated by ultrasonography with relative error 6.5% versus 8.6% (p=0.001). Ultrasound sensitivity was significantly better than Johnson-Toshach’s method for estimating fetal macrosomia (75% versus 62.5%, p=0.013). Johnson-Toshach’s method was significantly more sensitive than ultrasound to detect fetuses with normal weight (98% versus 89.3%, p=0.016). Furthermore ultrasonography showed better sensitivity than Johnson-Toshach’s method to detect low birth weight fetuses (57.8% versus 51.2%), but this difference was not significant (p=0.238). Conclusions: Fetal weight estimated by Johnson-Toshach’s method was more accurate than ultrasonography in pregnant women between 37 and 41 weeks gestation who carried fetuses between 2 501- 3 999 g.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/138
url http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/138
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/138/pdf_27
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 60 No. 3 (2014); 211-219
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 60 Núm. 3 (2014); 211-219
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
reponame_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1852858414149926912
spelling Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional HospitalComparación del método de Johnson-Toshach y la ultra sonografía para estimar el ponderado fetal en gestantes a término asistidas en el Hospital Regional de CajamarcaRodríguez Castañeda, Cristian JoséQuispe Cuba, Juan CarlosObjective: To compare Johnson-Toshach’s method and ultrasonography in estimating fetal weight in term pregnant women. Design: Descriptive, comparative, prospective, longitudinal study. Institution: Hospital Regional de Cajamarca, Cajamarca, Peru. Participants: Term pregnant women. Methods: Uterine height was measured and fetal weight was estimated by Johnson-Toshach’s formula in 236 pregnant women 37-41 weeks. Subsequently, an obstetric ultrasound was performed in the same women to determine the fetal weight according Hadlock´s 2 formula. Delivery was expected within 48 hours; then the weight of the newborn was obtained. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 19 statistical package, student t and McNemar tests with p<0.05 significance. Main outcome measures: Fetal weight. Results: Fetal weight estimated by Johnson-Toshach’s method was more accurate than that calculated by ultrasonography with relative error 6.5% versus 8.6% (p=0.001). Ultrasound sensitivity was significantly better than Johnson-Toshach’s method for estimating fetal macrosomia (75% versus 62.5%, p=0.013). Johnson-Toshach’s method was significantly more sensitive than ultrasound to detect fetuses with normal weight (98% versus 89.3%, p=0.016). Furthermore ultrasonography showed better sensitivity than Johnson-Toshach’s method to detect low birth weight fetuses (57.8% versus 51.2%), but this difference was not significant (p=0.238). Conclusions: Fetal weight estimated by Johnson-Toshach’s method was more accurate than ultrasonography in pregnant women between 37 and 41 weeks gestation who carried fetuses between 2 501- 3 999 g.Objetivo: Comparar el método de Johnson-Toshach y la ultrasonografía en la estimación del ponderado fetal en gestantes a término. Diseño: Estudio descriptivo, comparativo, prospectivo, longitudinal. Institución: Hospital Regional de Cajamarca, Cajamarca, Perú. Participantes: Gestantes a término. Métodos: A 236 gestantes entre 37 y 41 semanas se midió la altura uterina y según la fórmula de Johnson-Toshach se calculó el ponderado fetal; posteriormente, se realizó una ecografía obstétrica para estimar el ponderado fetal según la fórmula de Hadlock 2. Se esperó un máximo de 48 horas para el parto; luego, se pesó al recién nacido. Se realizó el análisis estadístico en el programa SPSS 19, utilizando las pruebas t student y de McNemar, con un valor p<0,05. Principales medidas de resultados: Peso fetal. Resultados: El promedio del peso fetal estimado por el método de Johnson-Toshach fue más exacto que el calculado por ultrasonografía, con un error relativo de 6,5% versus 8,6% (p=0,001). En fetos macrosómicos, la sensibilidad de la ultrasonografía fue significativamente superior a la del método de Johnson-Toshach (75% versus 62,5%, p=0,013). En fetos con peso normal, el método de Johnson-Toshach fue significativamente más sensible que la ultrasonografía (98% versus 89,3%, p=0,016). En fetos con peso bajo, la ultrasonografía tuvo mejor sensibilidad que el método de Johnson-Toshach (57,8% versus 51,2%), pero la diferencia no fue significativa (p=0,238). Conclusiones: El ponderado fetal estimado por el método de Johnson-Toshach fue más exacto que la ultrasonografía en gestantes entre 37 y 41 semanas de gestación, para fetos con pesos entre 2 501 y 3 999 g.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2014-10-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/138The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 60 No. 3 (2014); 211-219Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 60 Núm. 3 (2014); 211-2192304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/138/pdf_27info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1382014-10-12T03:34:35Z
score 12.671282
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).