Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: To compare Johnson-Toshach’s method and ultrasonography in estimating fetal weight in term pregnant women. Design: Descriptive, comparative, prospective, longitudinal study. Institution: Hospital Regional de Cajamarca, Cajamarca, Peru. Participants: Term pregnant women. Methods: Uterine h...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2014 |
| Institución: | Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| Repositorio: | Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/138 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/138 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| id |
REVSPOG_d41b58a92b7c0ad0bb3ffdb99288c370 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/138 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVSPOG |
| network_name_str |
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| repository_id_str |
. |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital Comparación del método de Johnson-Toshach y la ultra sonografía para estimar el ponderado fetal en gestantes a término asistidas en el Hospital Regional de Cajamarca |
| title |
Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital |
| spellingShingle |
Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital Rodríguez Castañeda, Cristian José |
| title_short |
Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital |
| title_full |
Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital |
| title_fullStr |
Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital |
| title_sort |
Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional Hospital |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Rodríguez Castañeda, Cristian José Quispe Cuba, Juan Carlos |
| author |
Rodríguez Castañeda, Cristian José |
| author_facet |
Rodríguez Castañeda, Cristian José Quispe Cuba, Juan Carlos |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Quispe Cuba, Juan Carlos |
| author2_role |
author |
| description |
Objective: To compare Johnson-Toshach’s method and ultrasonography in estimating fetal weight in term pregnant women. Design: Descriptive, comparative, prospective, longitudinal study. Institution: Hospital Regional de Cajamarca, Cajamarca, Peru. Participants: Term pregnant women. Methods: Uterine height was measured and fetal weight was estimated by Johnson-Toshach’s formula in 236 pregnant women 37-41 weeks. Subsequently, an obstetric ultrasound was performed in the same women to determine the fetal weight according Hadlock´s 2 formula. Delivery was expected within 48 hours; then the weight of the newborn was obtained. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 19 statistical package, student t and McNemar tests with p<0.05 significance. Main outcome measures: Fetal weight. Results: Fetal weight estimated by Johnson-Toshach’s method was more accurate than that calculated by ultrasonography with relative error 6.5% versus 8.6% (p=0.001). Ultrasound sensitivity was significantly better than Johnson-Toshach’s method for estimating fetal macrosomia (75% versus 62.5%, p=0.013). Johnson-Toshach’s method was significantly more sensitive than ultrasound to detect fetuses with normal weight (98% versus 89.3%, p=0.016). Furthermore ultrasonography showed better sensitivity than Johnson-Toshach’s method to detect low birth weight fetuses (57.8% versus 51.2%), but this difference was not significant (p=0.238). Conclusions: Fetal weight estimated by Johnson-Toshach’s method was more accurate than ultrasonography in pregnant women between 37 and 41 weeks gestation who carried fetuses between 2 501- 3 999 g. |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-10-12 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/138 |
| url |
http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/138 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/138/pdf_27 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 60 No. 3 (2014); 211-219 Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 60 Núm. 3 (2014); 211-219 2304-5132 2304-5124 reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología instacron:SPOG |
| instname_str |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| instacron_str |
SPOG |
| institution |
SPOG |
| reponame_str |
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| collection |
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1852858414149926912 |
| spelling |
Johnson-Toshach’s method compared with ultrasound to determine fetal weight in term pregnant women attended at Cajamarca Regional HospitalComparación del método de Johnson-Toshach y la ultra sonografía para estimar el ponderado fetal en gestantes a término asistidas en el Hospital Regional de CajamarcaRodríguez Castañeda, Cristian JoséQuispe Cuba, Juan CarlosObjective: To compare Johnson-Toshach’s method and ultrasonography in estimating fetal weight in term pregnant women. Design: Descriptive, comparative, prospective, longitudinal study. Institution: Hospital Regional de Cajamarca, Cajamarca, Peru. Participants: Term pregnant women. Methods: Uterine height was measured and fetal weight was estimated by Johnson-Toshach’s formula in 236 pregnant women 37-41 weeks. Subsequently, an obstetric ultrasound was performed in the same women to determine the fetal weight according Hadlock´s 2 formula. Delivery was expected within 48 hours; then the weight of the newborn was obtained. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 19 statistical package, student t and McNemar tests with p<0.05 significance. Main outcome measures: Fetal weight. Results: Fetal weight estimated by Johnson-Toshach’s method was more accurate than that calculated by ultrasonography with relative error 6.5% versus 8.6% (p=0.001). Ultrasound sensitivity was significantly better than Johnson-Toshach’s method for estimating fetal macrosomia (75% versus 62.5%, p=0.013). Johnson-Toshach’s method was significantly more sensitive than ultrasound to detect fetuses with normal weight (98% versus 89.3%, p=0.016). Furthermore ultrasonography showed better sensitivity than Johnson-Toshach’s method to detect low birth weight fetuses (57.8% versus 51.2%), but this difference was not significant (p=0.238). Conclusions: Fetal weight estimated by Johnson-Toshach’s method was more accurate than ultrasonography in pregnant women between 37 and 41 weeks gestation who carried fetuses between 2 501- 3 999 g.Objetivo: Comparar el método de Johnson-Toshach y la ultrasonografía en la estimación del ponderado fetal en gestantes a término. Diseño: Estudio descriptivo, comparativo, prospectivo, longitudinal. Institución: Hospital Regional de Cajamarca, Cajamarca, Perú. Participantes: Gestantes a término. Métodos: A 236 gestantes entre 37 y 41 semanas se midió la altura uterina y según la fórmula de Johnson-Toshach se calculó el ponderado fetal; posteriormente, se realizó una ecografía obstétrica para estimar el ponderado fetal según la fórmula de Hadlock 2. Se esperó un máximo de 48 horas para el parto; luego, se pesó al recién nacido. Se realizó el análisis estadístico en el programa SPSS 19, utilizando las pruebas t student y de McNemar, con un valor p<0,05. Principales medidas de resultados: Peso fetal. Resultados: El promedio del peso fetal estimado por el método de Johnson-Toshach fue más exacto que el calculado por ultrasonografía, con un error relativo de 6,5% versus 8,6% (p=0,001). En fetos macrosómicos, la sensibilidad de la ultrasonografía fue significativamente superior a la del método de Johnson-Toshach (75% versus 62,5%, p=0,013). En fetos con peso normal, el método de Johnson-Toshach fue significativamente más sensible que la ultrasonografía (98% versus 89,3%, p=0,016). En fetos con peso bajo, la ultrasonografía tuvo mejor sensibilidad que el método de Johnson-Toshach (57,8% versus 51,2%), pero la diferencia no fue significativa (p=0,238). Conclusiones: El ponderado fetal estimado por el método de Johnson-Toshach fue más exacto que la ultrasonografía en gestantes entre 37 y 41 semanas de gestación, para fetos con pesos entre 2 501 y 3 999 g.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2014-10-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/138The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 60 No. 3 (2014); 211-219Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 60 Núm. 3 (2014); 211-2192304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/138/pdf_27info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1382014-10-12T03:34:35Z |
| score |
12.671282 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).