New challenges in protecting women’s life and health

Descripción del Articulo

Background: One of the UN Sustainable Development Goals is to reduce maternal mortality. Objective: To determine knowledge, attitudes and practices of health professionals regarding abortion. Design: Cross-sectional type of survey. Methods: During 2017, the Ecuadorian Federation of Gynecology and Ob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Miranda, Octavio, Ortiz, Tatiana, Yuen Chon, Vicente
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/2184
Enlace del recurso:https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2184
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVSPOG_c17f5718d0245e0dc4796110a0c930f5
oai_identifier_str oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/2184
network_acronym_str REVSPOG
network_name_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository_id_str .
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv New challenges in protecting women’s life and health
Nuevos retos en la protección de la vida y salud de las mujeres
title New challenges in protecting women’s life and health
spellingShingle New challenges in protecting women’s life and health
Miranda, Octavio
title_short New challenges in protecting women’s life and health
title_full New challenges in protecting women’s life and health
title_fullStr New challenges in protecting women’s life and health
title_full_unstemmed New challenges in protecting women’s life and health
title_sort New challenges in protecting women’s life and health
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Miranda, Octavio
Ortiz, Tatiana
Yuen Chon, Vicente
author Miranda, Octavio
author_facet Miranda, Octavio
Ortiz, Tatiana
Yuen Chon, Vicente
author_role author
author2 Ortiz, Tatiana
Yuen Chon, Vicente
author2_role author
author
description Background: One of the UN Sustainable Development Goals is to reduce maternal mortality. Objective: To determine knowledge, attitudes and practices of health professionals regarding abortion. Design: Cross-sectional type of survey. Methods: During 2017, the Ecuadorian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Society - FESGO applied a survey to 132 health professionals to determine their knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding abortion. Results: We identified more nonpunishable abortion causes than those the law recognizes. The most frequent of these were rape (21%) and congenital malformations (13%). 83% of respondents agreed that law should allow ending a pregnancy if the woman’s life were at risk and 46% if her health was at risk. 61% of them agreed if the fetus had a congenital malformation. In addition, 46% agreed if it was the product of rape of a disabled woman, 40% if it was the product of rape, and 28%, if it was product of an incest. In case of a disabled woman pregnant because of rape, 57% would give information on options for pregnancy interruption, and 26% would give information on the legal frame that allows pregnancy interruption. However, 23% would lie by saying that the country’s legal frame does not allow pregnancy interruption. Conclusions: The survey reflects a wider perception on non-punishable abortion causatives than what the law recognizes. Nevertheless, 23% would indicate that the country’s legal frame does not allow pregnancy interruption, contradicting the legal regulation that protects the woman’s right to abortion access to protect her health and life. Barriers against the women’s right to decide on her health persist.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-27
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2184
10.31403/rpgo.v66i2184
url https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2184
identifier_str_mv 10.31403/rpgo.v66i2184
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2184/pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 65 No. 3 (2019); 293-298
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 65 Núm. 3 (2019); 293-298
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
reponame_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1868078734522712064
spelling New challenges in protecting women’s life and healthNuevos retos en la protección de la vida y salud de las mujeresMiranda, OctavioOrtiz, TatianaYuen Chon, VicenteBackground: One of the UN Sustainable Development Goals is to reduce maternal mortality. Objective: To determine knowledge, attitudes and practices of health professionals regarding abortion. Design: Cross-sectional type of survey. Methods: During 2017, the Ecuadorian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Society - FESGO applied a survey to 132 health professionals to determine their knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding abortion. Results: We identified more nonpunishable abortion causes than those the law recognizes. The most frequent of these were rape (21%) and congenital malformations (13%). 83% of respondents agreed that law should allow ending a pregnancy if the woman’s life were at risk and 46% if her health was at risk. 61% of them agreed if the fetus had a congenital malformation. In addition, 46% agreed if it was the product of rape of a disabled woman, 40% if it was the product of rape, and 28%, if it was product of an incest. In case of a disabled woman pregnant because of rape, 57% would give information on options for pregnancy interruption, and 26% would give information on the legal frame that allows pregnancy interruption. However, 23% would lie by saying that the country’s legal frame does not allow pregnancy interruption. Conclusions: The survey reflects a wider perception on non-punishable abortion causatives than what the law recognizes. Nevertheless, 23% would indicate that the country’s legal frame does not allow pregnancy interruption, contradicting the legal regulation that protects the woman’s right to abortion access to protect her health and life. Barriers against the women’s right to decide on her health persist.Introducción. Uno de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible es reducir la mortalidad materna. Objetivo. Valorar los conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas de profesionales de la salud en relación con el aborto. Diseño. Estudio transversal tipo encuesta. Métodos. En el año 2017, FESGO aplicó una encuesta a 132 profesionales de la salud, para valorar sus conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas en relación con el aborto. Resultados. La encuesta reflejó una percepción más amplia de causales de aborto no punible que las que la ley reconoce, destacando la violación en 21% y las malformaciones congénitas en 13%. El 83% estaría de acuerdo que la ley permita la interrupción de un embarazo frente al riesgo para la vida de la mujer, 46% frente al riesgo de salud; 61% por malformaciones congénitas fetales, 46% en caso de violación a una mujer con discapacidad y 40% en la violación en general; 28%, en casos de incesto. En caso de una mujer con discapacidad embarazada por violación, el 57% señaló que le daría información sobre las opciones de interrupción. El 26% le daría información sobre el marco legal que le permite la interrupción del embarazo. Pero, el 23% le indicaría que el marco legal del país no permite la interrupción. Conclusiones. La encuesta refleja una percepción más amplia de causales de aborto no punible que las que la ley reconoce. Un 23% indicaría que el marco legal del país no permite la interrupción del embarazo, contradiciendo la norma legal que protege el derecho de esa mujer a acceder a un aborto para proteger su salud y su vida. Persisten barreras para garantizar el derecho de las mujeres a decidir sobre su salud.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2019-06-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/218410.31403/rpgo.v66i2184The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 65 No. 3 (2019); 293-298Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 65 Núm. 3 (2019); 293-2982304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttps://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2184/pdfDerechos de autor 2019 Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/21842026-01-12T16:28:19Z
score 13.408945
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).