DELIVERY INSTRUMENTAL IN MODERN OBSTETRICS EXPERIENCE AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Descripción del Articulo

OBJETIVE: To analyze the casuistry of CHPR of the last five years, to analyze the place of instrumental delivery, its results, and since the reintroduction of the vacuum extractor, a systematic review comparing the qualities between both methods. METHODS: A systematic review on the use of instrument...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Sotero, Gonzalo, Sosa, Claudio, Laborde, Alejandro, Domínguez, Álvaro, Cuadro, J.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/545
Enlace del recurso:http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/545
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Descripción
Sumario:OBJETIVE: To analyze the casuistry of CHPR of the last five years, to analyze the place of instrumental delivery, its results, and since the reintroduction of the vacuum extractor, a systematic review comparing the qualities between both methods. METHODS: A systematic review on the use of instrumental delivery. RESULTS: The number of instrumental deliveries in the Hospital is similar to other reference centers and is within the accepted; perinatal maternal outcomes are similar to those of normal deliveries. CONCLUSION: The choice of vacuum vs. forceps, the decision lies primarily in training technical.
DELIVERY INSTRUMENTAL IN MODERN OBSTETRICS EXPERIENCE AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares