SATISFACTION USERS OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS. EXPERIENCE CAYETANO HEREDIA NATIONAL HOSPITAL

Descripción del Articulo

OBJECTIVES. To determíne the characteristics and satisfaction of levonorgestrel users (Norplant®) at the CHNH Family Planning Program. DESIGN: Descriptive retrospective study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-two users to whom Norplant® was removed between January 1995 and December 1999, were included....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Pretell Mazzini, Juan, Mauricio, Juan
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/450
Enlace del recurso:http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/450
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVSPOG_86dd471f6fa0ba7609bf594ab0e6cf1d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/450
network_acronym_str REVSPOG
network_name_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository_id_str .
spelling SATISFACTION USERS OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS. EXPERIENCE CAYETANO HEREDIA NATIONAL HOSPITALSATISFACCIÓN DE LAS USUARIAS DE IMPLANTES DE LEVONORGESTREL. EXPERIENCIA DEL HOSPITAL NACIONAL CAYETANO HEREDIAPretell Mazzini, JuanMauricio, JuanOBJECTIVES. To determíne the characteristics and satisfaction of levonorgestrel users (Norplant®) at the CHNH Family Planning Program. DESIGN: Descriptive retrospective study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-two users to whom Norplant® was removed between January 1995 and December 1999, were included. Data was obtained from records and satisfaction was evaluated through a survey employing Likert´scale. RESULTS: Up to 71,9% ofusers were satisfied, The pregnancy rate was 0%; 70,7% of users presented a side effect, being menstrual irregularíties the most frequent (47,6%). The main advantage was protection against pregnancy at the long term (53,7%). A 59% of continuity was registered during the five years and the main causes of early removal were pregnancy desire and menstrual alterations with 23,5% in both cases. A statistical significance was found with users satisfaction in the following variables: weight gain (p= 0,0077), pain at the implantation zone (p= 0,000055), depressive symptoms (p= 0,000000), educational level (p= 0, 033), method recommendation (p= 0, 0000) and desire for a re -implant (p= 0,00000). CONCLUSIONS. The levonorgestrel subdermal implants (Norplant®) was a very well accepted contraceptive method in spite of the side effects, high1y effective and a good alternative for women wishing a long term contraceptive.OBJETIVOS:Determinar las características y el porcentaje de satisfacción de las usuarias de implante subdérmico de levonorgestrel (Norplant®)pertenecientes al Programa de Planificación Familiar del HNCH. DISEÑO: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo. MATERIAL Y METODOS : Del total de usuarios a quienes se les extrajo el implante entre enero 1995 y diciembre 1999, se incluyo 82. Los datos fueron obtenidos mediante una ficha de recolección de datos y una encuesta. La satisfacción fue evaluada mediante la escala de Likert. REULTADOS: El 71,9% de usuarias resulto satisfecha La tasa deembarazo fue 0%. El 70,7% de las usuarias presento algun efecto secundario, el mas frecuente fue la alteración de la mestruacion (47,6%). La principal ventaja fue la protección contra el embarazo a largo plazo (53,7%). Se registro 59% de continuidad a los 5 años y las principales causas de remoción temprana fueron deseo de embarazo (23,5%) y alteraciones mestruales (23,5%). Se encontró significancia estadística con la satisfacción evaluada en la siguientes variables: aumento de peso (p= 0,0077), dolor en zona del implante (p= 0,000055), síntomas depresivos (0,00000), nivel educativo (p =0,033), recomendación del metodo (p= 0,000) y deseo de reimplante (p= 0,0000). CONCLUSIONES: Los implantes subdérmicos de levonorgestrel resultan ser un metodo anticonceptivo muy bien aceptado por las usuarias, a pesar de los efectos secundarios que presentan, altamente efectivo y una buena alternativa para mujeres que deseen anticoncepción a largo plazo.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2015-05-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/450The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 49 No. 4 (2003); 237-242Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 49 Núm. 4 (2003); 237-2422304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/450/417info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4502015-07-30T23:00:03Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SATISFACTION USERS OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS. EXPERIENCE CAYETANO HEREDIA NATIONAL HOSPITAL
SATISFACCIÓN DE LAS USUARIAS DE IMPLANTES DE LEVONORGESTREL. EXPERIENCIA DEL HOSPITAL NACIONAL CAYETANO HEREDIA
title SATISFACTION USERS OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS. EXPERIENCE CAYETANO HEREDIA NATIONAL HOSPITAL
spellingShingle SATISFACTION USERS OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS. EXPERIENCE CAYETANO HEREDIA NATIONAL HOSPITAL
Pretell Mazzini, Juan
title_short SATISFACTION USERS OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS. EXPERIENCE CAYETANO HEREDIA NATIONAL HOSPITAL
title_full SATISFACTION USERS OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS. EXPERIENCE CAYETANO HEREDIA NATIONAL HOSPITAL
title_fullStr SATISFACTION USERS OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS. EXPERIENCE CAYETANO HEREDIA NATIONAL HOSPITAL
title_full_unstemmed SATISFACTION USERS OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS. EXPERIENCE CAYETANO HEREDIA NATIONAL HOSPITAL
title_sort SATISFACTION USERS OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS. EXPERIENCE CAYETANO HEREDIA NATIONAL HOSPITAL
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pretell Mazzini, Juan
Mauricio, Juan
author Pretell Mazzini, Juan
author_facet Pretell Mazzini, Juan
Mauricio, Juan
author_role author
author2 Mauricio, Juan
author2_role author
description OBJECTIVES. To determíne the characteristics and satisfaction of levonorgestrel users (Norplant®) at the CHNH Family Planning Program. DESIGN: Descriptive retrospective study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-two users to whom Norplant® was removed between January 1995 and December 1999, were included. Data was obtained from records and satisfaction was evaluated through a survey employing Likert´scale. RESULTS: Up to 71,9% ofusers were satisfied, The pregnancy rate was 0%; 70,7% of users presented a side effect, being menstrual irregularíties the most frequent (47,6%). The main advantage was protection against pregnancy at the long term (53,7%). A 59% of continuity was registered during the five years and the main causes of early removal were pregnancy desire and menstrual alterations with 23,5% in both cases. A statistical significance was found with users satisfaction in the following variables: weight gain (p= 0,0077), pain at the implantation zone (p= 0,000055), depressive symptoms (p= 0,000000), educational level (p= 0, 033), method recommendation (p= 0, 0000) and desire for a re -implant (p= 0,00000). CONCLUSIONS. The levonorgestrel subdermal implants (Norplant®) was a very well accepted contraceptive method in spite of the side effects, high1y effective and a good alternative for women wishing a long term contraceptive.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/450
url http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/450
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/450/417
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 49 No. 4 (2003); 237-242
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 49 Núm. 4 (2003); 237-242
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
reponame_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1847150805171306496
score 13.136109
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).