The right to strike under debate. Its construction within the specialized system, current controversy and its referral to the advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice

Descripción del Articulo

The dispute that had place at the International Labour Organization regarding the exercise of the right to strike has propelled the Governing Body to refer the matter to the International Court of Justice, invoking its advisory jurisdiction. This is a serious matter as it reflects a crisis triggered...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Mendoza Legoas, Luis
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33112
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/33112
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Huelga
Corte Internacional de Justicia
Derechos Humanos Laborales
Organización Internacional del Trabajo
Jurisdicción Consultiva
Derecho Laboral
Strike
International Court of Justice
Labour Human Rights
International Labour Organization
Advisory Jurisdiction
Labour Law
id REVPUCP_f14e82f201b6d5d432691ecaa6efe745
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33112
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling The right to strike under debate. Its construction within the specialized system, current controversy and its referral to the advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of JusticeEl derecho a huelga en debate: su construcción dentro del sistema especializado, actual polémica y su remisión a la jurisdicción consultiva de la Corte Internacional de JusticiaMendoza Legoas, LuisHuelgaCorte Internacional de JusticiaDerechos Humanos LaboralesOrganización Internacional del TrabajoJurisdicción ConsultivaDerecho LaboralStrikeInternational Court of JusticeLabour Human RightsInternational Labour OrganizationAdvisory JurisdictionLabour LawThe dispute that had place at the International Labour Organization regarding the exercise of the right to strike has propelled the Governing Body to refer the matter to the International Court of Justice, invoking its advisory jurisdiction. This is a serious matter as it reflects a crisis triggered by the employers’ group’s questioning about including the right to strike in the ILO Convention No. 87 and the capacity of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations to interpret the respective standards. This issue may offer an opportunity to assess the complementarity of labour human rights protection systems and the suitability of the advisory opinion to be issued to contribute to restoring the functioning of ILO methods after this major incident.La disputa producida al interior de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo respecto al ejercicio del derecho de huelga ha motivado que el Consejo de Administración decida someter el asunto ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia, invocando su competencia consultiva. Se trata de un asunto grave pues expresa una crisis provocada por el cuestionamiento del grupo empleador a la presencia del derecho de huelga dentro del Convenio núm. 87 de la OIT y a la capacidad del Comité de Expertos en la Aplicación de Convenios y Recomendaciones de interpretar las normas respectivas. Este asunto puede ofrecer una oportunidad para evaluar la complementariedad de los sistemas de protección de los derechos humanos laborales y la aptitud de la opinión consultiva a emitirse para contribuir a la recomposición del funcionamiento de los métodos de la OIT tras este importante incidente.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2025-08-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/epub+ziptext/htmlhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/33112IUS ET VERITAS; No. 70 (2025): Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos: Desafíos y perspectivas globales; 151-172IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 70 (2025): Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos: Desafíos y perspectivas globales; 151-172IUS ET VERITAS; No. 70 (2025): Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos: Desafíos y perspectivas globales; 151-172IUS ET VERITAS; N. 70 (2025): Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos: Desafíos y perspectivas globales; 151-172IUS ET VERITAS; n. 70 (2025): Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos: Desafíos y perspectivas globales; 151-1721995-2929reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/33112/28496http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/33112/28497http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/33112/28498http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/331122026-01-16T20:22:05Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The right to strike under debate. Its construction within the specialized system, current controversy and its referral to the advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
El derecho a huelga en debate: su construcción dentro del sistema especializado, actual polémica y su remisión a la jurisdicción consultiva de la Corte Internacional de Justicia
title The right to strike under debate. Its construction within the specialized system, current controversy and its referral to the advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
spellingShingle The right to strike under debate. Its construction within the specialized system, current controversy and its referral to the advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
Mendoza Legoas, Luis
Huelga
Corte Internacional de Justicia
Derechos Humanos Laborales
Organización Internacional del Trabajo
Jurisdicción Consultiva
Derecho Laboral
Strike
International Court of Justice
Labour Human Rights
International Labour Organization
Advisory Jurisdiction
Labour Law
title_short The right to strike under debate. Its construction within the specialized system, current controversy and its referral to the advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
title_full The right to strike under debate. Its construction within the specialized system, current controversy and its referral to the advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
title_fullStr The right to strike under debate. Its construction within the specialized system, current controversy and its referral to the advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
title_full_unstemmed The right to strike under debate. Its construction within the specialized system, current controversy and its referral to the advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
title_sort The right to strike under debate. Its construction within the specialized system, current controversy and its referral to the advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mendoza Legoas, Luis
author Mendoza Legoas, Luis
author_facet Mendoza Legoas, Luis
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Huelga
Corte Internacional de Justicia
Derechos Humanos Laborales
Organización Internacional del Trabajo
Jurisdicción Consultiva
Derecho Laboral
Strike
International Court of Justice
Labour Human Rights
International Labour Organization
Advisory Jurisdiction
Labour Law
topic Huelga
Corte Internacional de Justicia
Derechos Humanos Laborales
Organización Internacional del Trabajo
Jurisdicción Consultiva
Derecho Laboral
Strike
International Court of Justice
Labour Human Rights
International Labour Organization
Advisory Jurisdiction
Labour Law
description The dispute that had place at the International Labour Organization regarding the exercise of the right to strike has propelled the Governing Body to refer the matter to the International Court of Justice, invoking its advisory jurisdiction. This is a serious matter as it reflects a crisis triggered by the employers’ group’s questioning about including the right to strike in the ILO Convention No. 87 and the capacity of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations to interpret the respective standards. This issue may offer an opportunity to assess the complementarity of labour human rights protection systems and the suitability of the advisory opinion to be issued to contribute to restoring the functioning of ILO methods after this major incident.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-08-27
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/33112
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/33112
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/33112/28496
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/33112/28497
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/33112/28498
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/epub+zip
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv IUS ET VERITAS; No. 70 (2025): Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos: Desafíos y perspectivas globales; 151-172
IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 70 (2025): Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos: Desafíos y perspectivas globales; 151-172
IUS ET VERITAS; No. 70 (2025): Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos: Desafíos y perspectivas globales; 151-172
IUS ET VERITAS; N. 70 (2025): Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos: Desafíos y perspectivas globales; 151-172
IUS ET VERITAS; n. 70 (2025): Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos: Desafíos y perspectivas globales; 151-172
1995-2929
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1856122341970411520
score 13.4263
The right to strike under debate. Its construction within the specialized system, current controversy and its referral to the advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares