State International Responsibility for Autonomous Weapons and Cyber Operations: Attribution, Traceability, and Challenges for International Humanitarian Law

Descripción del Articulo

This article examines how autonomous weapons systems and cyber operations challenge the law of State responsibility, focusing on attribution, traceability, and compliance with International Humanitarian Law (IHL). Building on the Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Rodríguez Bustamante, José Roberto
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2026
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34382
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/34382
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:State responsibility
Attribution
Due diligence
Traceability
Autonomous weapons
Cyber operations
International Humanitarian Law
Responsabilidad del Estado
Atribución
Diligencia debida
Trazabilidad
Armas autónomas
Ciberoperaciones
Derecho internacional humanitario
Descripción
Sumario:This article examines how autonomous weapons systems and cyber operations challenge the law of State responsibility, focusing on attribution, traceability, and compliance with International Humanitarian Law (IHL). Building on the Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA) and the core IHL principles of distinction, proportionality, and precautions, the paper argues that today’s problem is not a legal “gap” but an operational accountability deficit: technological opacity, distributed supply chains, and the transnational architecture of cyberspace make attribution harder to evidence and weaken pathways to responsibility. Using an analytical and comparative approach, the study advances a functional reinterpretation of traditional attribution and control tests by integrating complementary standards: technical traceability, system foreseeability, enhanced duties of prevention and due diligence, and meaningful human control over critical decisions. It further proposes a life-cycle framework (design–deployment–use) to strengthen attribution and responsibility for omissions, and concludes with targeted normative and policy recommendations to support clearer accountability in algorithmic and cyber-enabled warfare, including avenues for regional standard-setting.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).