The Solomon four groups plan: A cross-Hispanamerican educational evaluation

Descripción del Articulo

Two modalities of research design's workshops -long and short- were developed to qualify 658 Hispanamerican research workers, whom were divided into 30 groups, and were applyied along ten years. The terminal efficiency of the workshops was measured with a pre-post-test design and the difference...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Gorenc, Klaus-Dieter, Castro Bonilla, Luis, Peredo Rivera, Sandra, Abreu Rivera, Luis Felipe, Oblitas Guadalupe, Luis Armando, Llanos Zuloaga, Roberto
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:1995
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7368
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/7368
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:training
research designs
pre-post-test
multiple pre-post-test
Solomon four-group design
protest-treatment interaction
entrenamiento
diseños de investigación
pre-post-test múltiple
diseño de cuatro grupos de Solomon
interacción del tratamiento-pretest
Descripción
Sumario:Two modalities of research design's workshops -long and short- were developed to qualify 658 Hispanamerican research workers, whom were divided into 30 groups, and were applyied along ten years. The terminal efficiency of the workshops was measured with a pre-post-test design and the differences were assessed with a t-test -for dependent samples-. The results showed that the values of the post-test were higher -p ? 0.001- than the pretest averages. Contrasting the two workshop versions, the average of the long workshop was significantly higher -p ? 0.001- than the short one, by means of a multiple pre-post-test design and the t-test for independent samples. Using Solomon four-group design it was feasible to establish that the significant increase of knowledge about research designs was not influenced by the interaction of the pretest and treatment factors and there was not observed any significant difference between both versions.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).