Contrast of a knowledge management model in a public university in central Mexico
Descripción del Articulo
Often, knowledge-generating organizations have been studied from the influence of their culture, structure and flexible and innovative processes, or from the influence of their leadership and the continuous training of their talents. In the present work, a higher education institution was well resea...
Autores: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2019 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21119 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/360gestion/article/view/21119 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | demands resources entrepreneurship innovation compliance demandas recursos emprendimiento innovación conformidad |
Sumario: | Often, knowledge-generating organizations have been studied from the influence of their culture, structure and flexible and innovative processes, or from the influence of their leadership and the continuous training of their talents. In the present work, a higher education institution was well researched from the topics established in the specialized literature from 2010 to 2018, the discourses of key informants and the reliability as well as the validity of an instrument that measured its underlying factors. For this purpose, three investigations were carried out: One documentary, another qualitative and another correlational in order to specify a model for the study of the phenomenon in question. The results show a prevalence of knowledge generation as a second order construct and a representation of its dimensions around the categories of «alliances», «networks» and «climates», as well as a factorial structure around the motivation, innovation and communication of opportunities based on resources and capabilities. Lines concerning empathy, commitment and satisfaction are seen as factors that would increase the percentage of the total variance explained, which was 54%. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).