Criticism of human dignity and the notion of “basic necessities” as a possibly better foundation for rights

Descripción del Articulo

What is the element in which human rights arebased? What is it that holds the set of rights that belong  to  every human being for the only fact of being such? Confronted with this questions, several different answers have been formulated. In the present, the position in doctrine that statesthat dig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Sosa Sacio, Juan Manuel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14459
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14459
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Constitutional Law
fundamental rights
dignity
basic human necessities
Derecho Constitucional
derechos humanos
dignidad
necesidades humanas básicas
id REVPUCP_b01a8645fe4e8af354a48d3a16732dad
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14459
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Criticism of human dignity and the notion of “basic necessities” as a possibly better foundation for rightsCrítica a la dignidad humana y la noción de “necesidades básicas” como un posible mejor fundamento para los derechosSosa Sacio, Juan ManuelConstitutional Lawfundamental rightsdignitybasic human necessitiesDerecho Constitucionalderechos humanosdignidadnecesidades humanas básicasWhat is the element in which human rights arebased? What is it that holds the set of rights that belong  to  every human being for the only fact of being such? Confronted with this questions, several different answers have been formulated. In the present, the position in doctrine that statesthat dignity should be the foundation of humanrights is the preferred.In this article, the author presents an alternative answer to these questions. He proposes the “basic human necessities” as the element in which human rights are founded. In order  to  achieve this, he criticizes the aforementioned position, and introduces arguments in favor of the one he defends.¿Cuál es el fundamento de los derechos huma-nos? ¿Qué es aquello que sostiene al conjunto de derechos inherentes a todo ser humano por susola condición de tal? Frente a estas preguntas sehan sostenido distintas respuestas. En la actua-lidad, prima en la doctrina la posición de que la dignidad debe ser el fundamento de los derechoshumanos.En el presente artículo, el autor nos plantea una respuesta alternativa a estas preguntas. Propone a las “necesidades humanas básicas” como fundamento de los derechos humanos. Para ello, critica a la posición anteriormente mencionada y plantea argumentos a favor de aquella que él sostiene.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2015-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14459THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 67 (2015): Derecho Constitucional; 87-991810-9934reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14459/15071Derechos de autor 2016 TH?MIS-Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/144592019-07-02T15:47:49Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Criticism of human dignity and the notion of “basic necessities” as a possibly better foundation for rights
Crítica a la dignidad humana y la noción de “necesidades básicas” como un posible mejor fundamento para los derechos
title Criticism of human dignity and the notion of “basic necessities” as a possibly better foundation for rights
spellingShingle Criticism of human dignity and the notion of “basic necessities” as a possibly better foundation for rights
Sosa Sacio, Juan Manuel
Constitutional Law
fundamental rights
dignity
basic human necessities
Derecho Constitucional
derechos humanos
dignidad
necesidades humanas básicas
title_short Criticism of human dignity and the notion of “basic necessities” as a possibly better foundation for rights
title_full Criticism of human dignity and the notion of “basic necessities” as a possibly better foundation for rights
title_fullStr Criticism of human dignity and the notion of “basic necessities” as a possibly better foundation for rights
title_full_unstemmed Criticism of human dignity and the notion of “basic necessities” as a possibly better foundation for rights
title_sort Criticism of human dignity and the notion of “basic necessities” as a possibly better foundation for rights
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sosa Sacio, Juan Manuel
author Sosa Sacio, Juan Manuel
author_facet Sosa Sacio, Juan Manuel
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Constitutional Law
fundamental rights
dignity
basic human necessities
Derecho Constitucional
derechos humanos
dignidad
necesidades humanas básicas
topic Constitutional Law
fundamental rights
dignity
basic human necessities
Derecho Constitucional
derechos humanos
dignidad
necesidades humanas básicas
description What is the element in which human rights arebased? What is it that holds the set of rights that belong  to  every human being for the only fact of being such? Confronted with this questions, several different answers have been formulated. In the present, the position in doctrine that statesthat dignity should be the foundation of humanrights is the preferred.In this article, the author presents an alternative answer to these questions. He proposes the “basic human necessities” as the element in which human rights are founded. In order  to  achieve this, he criticizes the aforementioned position, and introduces arguments in favor of the one he defends.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-07-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14459
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14459
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14459/15071
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 TH?MIS-Revista de Derecho
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 TH?MIS-Revista de Derecho
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 67 (2015): Derecho Constitucional; 87-99
1810-9934
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844706557267279872
score 13.243185
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).