A Possible Dialogue between Two Traditions. Between "Listening to the Other" and the "Principle of Charity"

Descripción del Articulo

In the framework of the discussions produced after the fiftieth anniversary of Hans-Georg Gadamer’s publication of Truth and Method (1960) this paper intends to address two issues of Gadamer’shermeneutics. The first issue seeks to establish the articulating thread betweenTruth and Method, still atta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Monteagudo, Cecilia
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2013
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/7633
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/7633
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:hermeneutics
listening to the other
principle of charity
interpretation
hermenéutica
escucha del otro
principio de caridad
interpretación
id REVPUCP_aaa3e8d68dd8e9ca2abfc64bfe45c7bf
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/7633
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling A Possible Dialogue between Two Traditions. Between "Listening to the Other" and the "Principle of Charity"El diálogo posible entre dos tradiciones. Entre la “escucha del otro” y el “principio de caridad”Monteagudo, Ceciliahermeneuticslistening to the otherprinciple of charityinterpretationhermenéuticaescucha del otroprincipio de caridadinterpretaciónIn the framework of the discussions produced after the fiftieth anniversary of Hans-Georg Gadamer’s publication of Truth and Method (1960) this paper intends to address two issues of Gadamer’shermeneutics. The first issue seeks to establish the articulating thread betweenTruth and Method, still attached to the debate with traditional hermeneutics, and some formulations of Gadamer’s later work, where “the soul of hermeneutics” isdisplayed as “art of listening to the other”. The second issue seeks to highlight the rehabilitation that Gadamer makes of the Socratic-Platonic eumeneîs élenchoi, an expression that he translates as the “art of strengthening the discourse of theother”, whose explicitness in his later work has enabled many interpreters of his work to see a possible dialogue between his hermeneutics and some aspects ofthe philosophy of Donald Davidson.En el marco de los debates producidos después de cumplirse el cincuentenario de la publicación de la obra de Hans-Georg Gadamer Verdad y método (1960) este trabajo se propone abordar dos asuntos de la propuesta hermenéutica del autor. El primero busca establecer el hilo articulador entre el discurso de la obra mencionada, todavía apegado a su debate con la hermenéutica tradicional, y algunas formulaciones de su obra tardía, donde “el alma de la hermenéutica” se despliega como “arte de escuchar al otro”. El segundo busca destacar la rehabilitación que Gadamer hace de la eumeneîs élenchoi socrático platónica. Expresión que se traduce como el “arte de reforzar el discurso del otro”, cuya explicitación en su obra tardía ha posibilitado que muchos intérpretes de su obra vean un diálogo posible entre su hermenéutica y algunos aspectos de la filosofía de Donald Davidson.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades2013-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/763310.18800/arete.201302.004Areté; Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2013); 267-2822223-37411016-913Xreponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/7633/7882Derechos de autor 2016 Aretéhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/76332020-09-02T15:23:40Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Possible Dialogue between Two Traditions. Between "Listening to the Other" and the "Principle of Charity"
El diálogo posible entre dos tradiciones. Entre la “escucha del otro” y el “principio de caridad”
title A Possible Dialogue between Two Traditions. Between "Listening to the Other" and the "Principle of Charity"
spellingShingle A Possible Dialogue between Two Traditions. Between "Listening to the Other" and the "Principle of Charity"
Monteagudo, Cecilia
hermeneutics
listening to the other
principle of charity
interpretation
hermenéutica
escucha del otro
principio de caridad
interpretación
title_short A Possible Dialogue between Two Traditions. Between "Listening to the Other" and the "Principle of Charity"
title_full A Possible Dialogue between Two Traditions. Between "Listening to the Other" and the "Principle of Charity"
title_fullStr A Possible Dialogue between Two Traditions. Between "Listening to the Other" and the "Principle of Charity"
title_full_unstemmed A Possible Dialogue between Two Traditions. Between "Listening to the Other" and the "Principle of Charity"
title_sort A Possible Dialogue between Two Traditions. Between "Listening to the Other" and the "Principle of Charity"
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Monteagudo, Cecilia
author Monteagudo, Cecilia
author_facet Monteagudo, Cecilia
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv hermeneutics
listening to the other
principle of charity
interpretation
hermenéutica
escucha del otro
principio de caridad
interpretación
topic hermeneutics
listening to the other
principle of charity
interpretation
hermenéutica
escucha del otro
principio de caridad
interpretación
description In the framework of the discussions produced after the fiftieth anniversary of Hans-Georg Gadamer’s publication of Truth and Method (1960) this paper intends to address two issues of Gadamer’shermeneutics. The first issue seeks to establish the articulating thread betweenTruth and Method, still attached to the debate with traditional hermeneutics, and some formulations of Gadamer’s later work, where “the soul of hermeneutics” isdisplayed as “art of listening to the other”. The second issue seeks to highlight the rehabilitation that Gadamer makes of the Socratic-Platonic eumeneîs élenchoi, an expression that he translates as the “art of strengthening the discourse of theother”, whose explicitness in his later work has enabled many interpreters of his work to see a possible dialogue between his hermeneutics and some aspects ofthe philosophy of Donald Davidson.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/7633
10.18800/arete.201302.004
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/7633
identifier_str_mv 10.18800/arete.201302.004
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/7633/7882
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Areté
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Areté
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Areté; Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2013); 267-282
2223-3741
1016-913X
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1840900478428250112
score 13.413352
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).