The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law

Descripción del Articulo

This article explains the contentious process of harmfulness. Thus, the author mentions that the foundation of the process of harmfulness has been on our right the survival of the Administrative security of the legality and the public interest butlimiting the self-enforcement, the requirement of bel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Morón Urbina, Juan Carlos
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/15660
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15660
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Proceso
Contencioso de Lesividad
Tutela Administrativa
Debido Proceso
Legalidad
Interés Público
Autotutela del Derecho Público
Process
Harmfulness Litigation
Administrative Scrutiny
Due Process of Law
Legality
Public Interest
Self- Enforcement of Public Law
id REVPUCP_7c403fb16165f9c002f679b0e09f7b00
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/15660
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian lawEl Proceso Contencioso de Lesividad: Catorce años después de su incorporación en el derecho peruanoMorón Urbina, Juan CarlosProcesoContencioso de LesividadTutela AdministrativaDebido ProcesoLegalidadInterés PúblicoAutotutela del Derecho PúblicoProcessHarmfulness LitigationAdministrative ScrutinyDue Process of LawLegalityPublic InterestSelf- Enforcement of Public LawThis article explains the contentious process of harmfulness. Thus, the author mentions that the foundation of the process of harmfulness has been on our right the survival of the Administrative security of the legality and the public interest butlimiting the self-enforcement, the requirement of belief in authority to pursue the annulment of an administrative act and to ensure the due process of law is being administered.El presente artículo explica el proceso contencioso de lesividad a partir de la naturaleza jurídica de éste .Así, el autor menciona que el fundamento del proceso de lesividad ha sido en nuestro derecho la pervivencia de la tutela administrativa de la legalidad y del interés público pero limitando la autotutela, la exigencia de convicción en la autoridad para perseguir la anulación de un acto y garantizar el debido proceso del administrado favorecido con el acto.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2015-11-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15660IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 51 (2015); 224-2461995-2929reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15660/16097Derechos de autor 2016 IUS ET VERITAShttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/156602017-04-06T01:01:12Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law
El Proceso Contencioso de Lesividad: Catorce años después de su incorporación en el derecho peruano
title The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law
spellingShingle The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law
Morón Urbina, Juan Carlos
Proceso
Contencioso de Lesividad
Tutela Administrativa
Debido Proceso
Legalidad
Interés Público
Autotutela del Derecho Público
Process
Harmfulness Litigation
Administrative Scrutiny
Due Process of Law
Legality
Public Interest
Self- Enforcement of Public Law
title_short The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law
title_full The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law
title_fullStr The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law
title_full_unstemmed The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law
title_sort The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Morón Urbina, Juan Carlos
author Morón Urbina, Juan Carlos
author_facet Morón Urbina, Juan Carlos
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Proceso
Contencioso de Lesividad
Tutela Administrativa
Debido Proceso
Legalidad
Interés Público
Autotutela del Derecho Público
Process
Harmfulness Litigation
Administrative Scrutiny
Due Process of Law
Legality
Public Interest
Self- Enforcement of Public Law
topic Proceso
Contencioso de Lesividad
Tutela Administrativa
Debido Proceso
Legalidad
Interés Público
Autotutela del Derecho Público
Process
Harmfulness Litigation
Administrative Scrutiny
Due Process of Law
Legality
Public Interest
Self- Enforcement of Public Law
description This article explains the contentious process of harmfulness. Thus, the author mentions that the foundation of the process of harmfulness has been on our right the survival of the Administrative security of the legality and the public interest butlimiting the self-enforcement, the requirement of belief in authority to pursue the annulment of an administrative act and to ensure the due process of law is being administered.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15660
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15660
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15660/16097
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 IUS ET VERITAS
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 IUS ET VERITAS
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 51 (2015); 224-246
1995-2929
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1840900283324956672
score 13.477541
The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares