Jean-Luc Marion: ¿fenomenólogo?
Descripción del Articulo
        “Jean-Luc Marion: Phenomenologist?”. How are we to understand the contradiction of a philosophy that claims to be a legitimate heir of the phenomenological tradition but, at the same time, intends to break free from its limits to allow an unconditioned manifestation? Should we comprehend Jean-Luc Ma...
              
            
    
                        | Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo | 
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2019 | 
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú | 
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú | 
| Lenguaje: | español | 
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21384 | 
| Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/21384 | 
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto | 
| Materia: | Jean-Luc Marion theological turn phenomenology intuition giveness giro teológico fenomenología intuición donación | 
| Sumario: | “Jean-Luc Marion: Phenomenologist?”. How are we to understand the contradiction of a philosophy that claims to be a legitimate heir of the phenomenological tradition but, at the same time, intends to break free from its limits to allow an unconditioned manifestation? Should we comprehend Jean-Luc Marion’s work as a true renovation of phenomenology –as he and his followers do–, or should we instead consider it as a pure theology independent from the phenomenological movement? Why would the theological way be the only possible way out of the crisis of contemporary metaphysics denounced by Marion and, even more, a necessary way? To answer these and other questions, this paper develops some of the paradoxes that arise from the Marionian theological turn, distinguishing two possible ways of understanding its Kehre: either as a deviation that allows extending phenomenology to new fields, or as a return to and abandonment of the phenomenological project. Finally, we wonder if Marion’s proposal of a gradual ontology does not encourage a third possible way, which would lead us to think of his thought not as phenomenology anymore, but as a gradualist-theological fansiology. | 
|---|
 Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
    La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
 
   
   
             
            