Medical Assistance in Dying: Where Is International Human Rights Law Heading?
Descripción del Articulo
In recent years, the debate around legalizing medical assistance in dying (MAID) has gained momentum worldwide. Sociocultural changes, advancements in bioethics, and statements from international organizations have contributed to an increase in the number of countries considering regulating MAID. Ho...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33110 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/33110 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Muerte médicamente asistida Eutanasia Suicidio asistido Derecho a una muerte digna Vida digna Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos Medical Assistance in Dying Euthanasia Assisted Suicide Right to die with dignity Life with dignity International Human Rights Law European Court of Human Rights |
| Sumario: | In recent years, the debate around legalizing medical assistance in dying (MAID) has gained momentum worldwide. Sociocultural changes, advancements in bioethics, and statements from international organizations have contributed to an increase in the number of countries considering regulating MAID. However, the debate is still characterized by legal tensions between human rights such as the right to life, freedom, privacy, and personal integrity. This article analyzes the current state of International Human Rights Law (IHRL) in relation to the legalization of MAID. It examines the standards established by both regional and universal human rights systems, focusing on the caselaw of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the statements issued by oversight bodies. The article aims to respond to what extent MAID is compatible with IHRL and what obligations states have when addressing this issue. Finally, it offers reflections on the criteria that should be considered when legislating this practice. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).