Feminist Strategies in A Doll's House (Henrik Ibsen) And Candida (George Bernard Shaw)

Descripción del Articulo

As the 120th anniversary of Henrik Ibsen's death and the 170th anniversary of George Bernard Shaw's birth in 2026 approaches, this paper aims to address the dialogue between the former’s play Candida (1898) and the latter’s A Doll's House (1879) to determine which elements coincide in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Fukelman, María
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30408
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/kaylla/article/view/30408
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Teatro de tesis
Feminismos
George Bernard Shaw
Henrik Ibsen
Estrategias
Teatro de tese
Estratégias
Thesis Theater
Feminisms
Strategies
id REVPUCP_1d238fcf47e25f09885c3e15af19131e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30408
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Feminist Strategies in A Doll's House (Henrik Ibsen) And Candida (George Bernard Shaw)
Estrategias feministas en Una casa de muñecas (Henrik Ibsen) y Cándida (George Bernard Shaw)
Estratégias feministas em Uma Casa de Muñecas (Henrik Ibsen) e Cândida (George Bernard Shaw)
title Feminist Strategies in A Doll's House (Henrik Ibsen) And Candida (George Bernard Shaw)
spellingShingle Feminist Strategies in A Doll's House (Henrik Ibsen) And Candida (George Bernard Shaw)
Fukelman, María
Teatro de tesis
Feminismos
George Bernard Shaw
Henrik Ibsen
Estrategias
Teatro de tese
Feminismos
George Bernard Shaw
Henrik Ibsen
Estratégias
Thesis Theater
Feminisms
George Bernard Shaw
Henrik Ibsen
Strategies
title_short Feminist Strategies in A Doll's House (Henrik Ibsen) And Candida (George Bernard Shaw)
title_full Feminist Strategies in A Doll's House (Henrik Ibsen) And Candida (George Bernard Shaw)
title_fullStr Feminist Strategies in A Doll's House (Henrik Ibsen) And Candida (George Bernard Shaw)
title_full_unstemmed Feminist Strategies in A Doll's House (Henrik Ibsen) And Candida (George Bernard Shaw)
title_sort Feminist Strategies in A Doll's House (Henrik Ibsen) And Candida (George Bernard Shaw)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fukelman, María
author Fukelman, María
author_facet Fukelman, María
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Teatro de tesis
Feminismos
George Bernard Shaw
Henrik Ibsen
Estrategias
Teatro de tese
Feminismos
George Bernard Shaw
Henrik Ibsen
Estratégias
Thesis Theater
Feminisms
George Bernard Shaw
Henrik Ibsen
Strategies
topic Teatro de tesis
Feminismos
George Bernard Shaw
Henrik Ibsen
Estrategias
Teatro de tese
Feminismos
George Bernard Shaw
Henrik Ibsen
Estratégias
Thesis Theater
Feminisms
George Bernard Shaw
Henrik Ibsen
Strategies
description As the 120th anniversary of Henrik Ibsen's death and the 170th anniversary of George Bernard Shaw's birth in 2026 approaches, this paper aims to address the dialogue between the former’s play Candida (1898) and the latter’s A Doll's House (1879) to determine which elements coincide in both texts, which differ, and what operations took place in these transformations. At the same time, the aim is to observe what contemporary feminist strategies and currents can be read in these dramatic texts. It is hypothesized that these two rebellious authors —in Brustein's (1970) terms— were pioneers in the construction of feminist heroines, but they did so by taking different paths. This article, then, aims to corroborate the following arguments: that Shaw wrote Candida as a response to A Doll's House, as other authors have already argued (Christian, 2015 ; Templeton, 2018); that he did so by apprehending the structure and some of its main elements but changing the main thesis; that, although this may have resulted in a different artistic meaning, both plays were written from a perspective that we can now consider feminist; and that the different decisions taken can be connected to the discussions that continue within feminist movements even today. In this sense, A Doll's House would embody a radical break with the patriarchal system from a liberal feminist perspective, while Candida would reflect a relational feminism and a more adaptive form of female power.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-11-14
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer reviewed article
Artículo evaluado por pares
Artigo avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/kaylla/article/view/30408
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/kaylla/article/view/30408
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/kaylla/article/view/30408/28108
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/kaylla/article/view/30408/28128
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento Académico de Artes Escénicas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento Académico de Artes Escénicas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Kaylla Journal of Performing Arts; No. 4 (2025): Kaylla N°4 – As Artes Cênicas Discutindo a História; 19-32
Revista Kaylla; Núm. 4 (2025): Kaylla N°4 – Las artes escénicas discutiendo la historia; 19-32
Revista Kaylla; n. 4 (2025): Kaylla N°4 – History Discussed by Performing Arts; 19-32
2955-8697
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1852317496359518208
spelling Feminist Strategies in A Doll's House (Henrik Ibsen) And Candida (George Bernard Shaw)Estrategias feministas en Una casa de muñecas (Henrik Ibsen) y Cándida (George Bernard Shaw)Estratégias feministas em Uma Casa de Muñecas (Henrik Ibsen) e Cândida (George Bernard Shaw)Fukelman, MaríaTeatro de tesisFeminismosGeorge Bernard ShawHenrik IbsenEstrategiasTeatro de teseFeminismosGeorge Bernard ShawHenrik IbsenEstratégiasThesis TheaterFeminismsGeorge Bernard ShawHenrik IbsenStrategiesAs the 120th anniversary of Henrik Ibsen's death and the 170th anniversary of George Bernard Shaw's birth in 2026 approaches, this paper aims to address the dialogue between the former’s play Candida (1898) and the latter’s A Doll's House (1879) to determine which elements coincide in both texts, which differ, and what operations took place in these transformations. At the same time, the aim is to observe what contemporary feminist strategies and currents can be read in these dramatic texts. It is hypothesized that these two rebellious authors —in Brustein's (1970) terms— were pioneers in the construction of feminist heroines, but they did so by taking different paths. This article, then, aims to corroborate the following arguments: that Shaw wrote Candida as a response to A Doll's House, as other authors have already argued (Christian, 2015 ; Templeton, 2018); that he did so by apprehending the structure and some of its main elements but changing the main thesis; that, although this may have resulted in a different artistic meaning, both plays were written from a perspective that we can now consider feminist; and that the different decisions taken can be connected to the discussions that continue within feminist movements even today. In this sense, A Doll's House would embody a radical break with the patriarchal system from a liberal feminist perspective, while Candida would reflect a relational feminism and a more adaptive form of female power.Con motivo de estar próximo a cumplirse, en 2026, el 120° aniversario del fallecimiento de Henrik Ibsen y el 170° aniversario del nacimiento de George Bernard Shaw, este trabajo propone abordar el diálogo entre la obra Una casa de muñecas (1879), del primero, y Cándida (1898), del segundo, para determinar qué elementos coinciden en ambos textos, cuáles difieren y qué operaciones tuvieron lugar en esas transformaciones. A su vez, se plantea observar qué estrategias y corrientes feministas contemporáneas pueden ser leídas en dichos textos dramáticos. Se parte de la hipótesis que estos dos autores rebeldes —en términos de Brustein (1970)— fueron pioneros en la construcción de heroínas feministas, pero lo hicieron tomando distintos caminos. El presente artículo, entonces, se propone corroborar los siguientes puntos: que Shaw escribió Cándida como una respuesta a Una casa de muñecas, como ya han sostenido otras autoras (Christian, 2015; Templeton, 2018); que lo hizo aprehendiendo la estructura y algunos de sus elementos principales, pero cambiando la tesis principal; que, aunque esto haya generado como resultado un sentido diferente, ambas piezas fueron hechas desde una perspectiva que hoy podemos considerar feminista; y que las distintas decisiones tomadas pueden conectarse con las discusiones que se dan en el seno de los movimientos feministas aún en la actualidad. Bajo esta lectura, Una casa de muñecas encarna una ruptura radical con el sistema patriarcal desde una perspectiva feminista liberal, mientras que Cándida da cuenta de un feminismo relacional y de una forma de poder femenino más adaptativo.Com a aproximação dos 120 anos da morte de Henrik Ibsen e do 170º aniversário do nascimento de George Bernard Shaw em 2026, este artigo pretende abordar o diálogo entre a peça Cândida (1898), de Shaw, e Casa de Bonecas (1879), de Ibsen, e determinar quais elementos coincidem em ambos os textos, quais diferem e quais operações ocorreram nessas transformações. Ao mesmo tempo, pretende-se observar que estratégias e correntes feministas contemporâneas podem ser lidas nesses textos dramáticos. Supõe-se que essas duas autoras rebeldes (nos termos de Brustein, 1970) foram pioneiras na construção de heroínas feministas, mas que o fizeram tomando caminhos diferentes. Este artigo, então, visa corroborar que Shaw escreveu Cândida como uma resposta a Casa de Bonecas (como outros autores já argumentaram, como Christian, 2015, e Templeton, 2018); que ela o fez apreendendo a estrutura e alguns de seus principais elementos, mas mudando a tese principal; que, embora isso possa ter resultado em um significado diferente, ambas as peças foram escritas a partir de uma perspectiva que hoje podemos considerar feminista; e que as diferentes decisões tomadas podem ser conectadas às discussões que continuam dentro dos movimentos feministas até hoje. Para tanto, Casa de Bonecas representaria uma ruptura radical com o sistema patriarcal a partir de uma perspectiva feminista liberal, enquanto Cândida refletiria um feminismo relacional e uma forma mais adaptável de poder feminino.Departamento Académico de Artes Escénicas2025-11-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewed articleArtículo evaluado por paresArtigo avaliado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/epub+ziphttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/kaylla/article/view/30408Kaylla Journal of Performing Arts; No. 4 (2025): Kaylla N°4 – As Artes Cênicas Discutindo a História; 19-32Revista Kaylla; Núm. 4 (2025): Kaylla N°4 – Las artes escénicas discutiendo la historia; 19-32Revista Kaylla; n. 4 (2025): Kaylla N°4 – History Discussed by Performing Arts; 19-322955-8697reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/kaylla/article/view/30408/28108http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/kaylla/article/view/30408/28128https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/304082025-11-17T23:56:03Z
score 13.446114
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).