Husserl Reading Kant. Remarks on Reason and its Limits

Descripción del Articulo

A preliminary overview of Husserl reading Kant shows that both thinkers represent two essentially different types of philosophies in their methods and reach. The judgement made by Husserl about Kant allows to state that we are facing two different privileged intuitions. Nevertheless, it also allows...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Rizo-Patrón, Rosemary
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2012
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3782
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/3782
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:transcendental philosophy
phenomenology
rationality
finitude
anthropology
teleology
filosofía trascendental
fenomenología
racionalidad
finitud
antropología
teleología
id REVPUCP_1c3bc901516d6b4c3b60fa3d52012979
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3782
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Husserl Reading Kant. Remarks on Reason and its LimitsHusserl, lector de Kant. Apuntes sobre la razón y sus límitesRizo-Patrón, Rosemarytranscendental philosophyphenomenologyrationalityfinitudeanthropologyteleologyfilosofía trascendentalfenomenologíaracionalidadfinitudantropologíateleologíaA preliminary overview of Husserl reading Kant shows that both thinkers represent two essentially different types of philosophies in their methods and reach. The judgement made by Husserl about Kant allows to state that we are facing two different privileged intuitions. Nevertheless, it also allows to state a “family resemblance”–if not in their styles and methodology– in certain ground convictions regarding philosophy and reason’s finite nature. This paper approaches, from a Husserlian perspective, the relationship between “experience and judgment” –proper to a “Transcendental Theory of Elements”– and in that between “science and philosophy” –corresponding to a “Transcendental Theory of Method”. Furthermore, it will approach the distinction between natural and transcendental-phenomenological attitudes that allow Husserl to introduce two levels of philosophical interrogation and two types of philosophical anthropologies, corresponding to the splitting of the ego – a pure constitutive ego and a constituted one. This last will lead to the genetic problem of the ego’s self-constitution from the deepest strata of passive instinctive life (unconscious and irrational) towards rational life in a teleological ascending movement that enacts the Kantian problem of reason’s finitude. Despite of the incorporation that Husserl makes of a teleology of Leibnizian type that resolves the Kantian hiatus between sensible and intelligible world, the Kant connoisseurs will recognize his tracks in the configuration of the Husserlian trascendental phenomenology.Una revisión preliminar de la lectura que hace Husserl de Kant muestra que ambos pensadores representan dos tipos de filosofía esencialmente distintas en sus métodos y alcances. El juicio que hace Husserl sobre Kant permite constatar que estamos ante distintas intuiciones privilegiadas. Empero, también permite constatar un “aire de familia” –si no en los estilos y la metodología– en ciertas convicciones de fondo respecto de la filosofía y la naturaleza finita de la razón. En este trabajo se aborda, desde la perspectiva husserliana, la relación entre “experiencia y juicio” –propia de una “teoría trascendental de los elementos” –y entre “ciencia y filosofía” –correspondiente a una “teoría trascendental del método.”Asimismo, se hará ver la distinción entre las actitudes natural y fenomenológica-trascendental que permite a Husserl introducir dos niveles de interrogaciónfilosófica, y dos tipos de antropologías filosóficas, correspondientes al desdoblamientodel yo– un yo puro constituyente y otro constituido. Esto último conducirá al problema genético de la auto-constitución del yo desde lo más profundo dela vida instintiva pasiva (inconsciente e irracional) hasta la vida racional en un movimiento de ascenso teleológico, que da lugar al replanteamiento del problema kantiano de la finitud de la razón. A pesar de que Husserl incorpora una teleología de tipo leibniziano que resuelve el hiato kantiano entre mundo sensible e inteligible, los conocedores de Kant podrán reconocer sus huellas en la configuración de la fenomenología trascendental husserliana.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades2012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/3782Areté; Vol. 24 Núm. 2 (2012); 351-3832223-37411016-913Xreponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/3782/pdfDerechos de autor 2016 Aretéhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37822020-09-02T17:53:32Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Husserl Reading Kant. Remarks on Reason and its Limits
Husserl, lector de Kant. Apuntes sobre la razón y sus límites
title Husserl Reading Kant. Remarks on Reason and its Limits
spellingShingle Husserl Reading Kant. Remarks on Reason and its Limits
Rizo-Patrón, Rosemary
transcendental philosophy
phenomenology
rationality
finitude
anthropology
teleology
filosofía trascendental
fenomenología
racionalidad
finitud
antropología
teleología
title_short Husserl Reading Kant. Remarks on Reason and its Limits
title_full Husserl Reading Kant. Remarks on Reason and its Limits
title_fullStr Husserl Reading Kant. Remarks on Reason and its Limits
title_full_unstemmed Husserl Reading Kant. Remarks on Reason and its Limits
title_sort Husserl Reading Kant. Remarks on Reason and its Limits
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rizo-Patrón, Rosemary
author Rizo-Patrón, Rosemary
author_facet Rizo-Patrón, Rosemary
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv transcendental philosophy
phenomenology
rationality
finitude
anthropology
teleology
filosofía trascendental
fenomenología
racionalidad
finitud
antropología
teleología
topic transcendental philosophy
phenomenology
rationality
finitude
anthropology
teleology
filosofía trascendental
fenomenología
racionalidad
finitud
antropología
teleología
description A preliminary overview of Husserl reading Kant shows that both thinkers represent two essentially different types of philosophies in their methods and reach. The judgement made by Husserl about Kant allows to state that we are facing two different privileged intuitions. Nevertheless, it also allows to state a “family resemblance”–if not in their styles and methodology– in certain ground convictions regarding philosophy and reason’s finite nature. This paper approaches, from a Husserlian perspective, the relationship between “experience and judgment” –proper to a “Transcendental Theory of Elements”– and in that between “science and philosophy” –corresponding to a “Transcendental Theory of Method”. Furthermore, it will approach the distinction between natural and transcendental-phenomenological attitudes that allow Husserl to introduce two levels of philosophical interrogation and two types of philosophical anthropologies, corresponding to the splitting of the ego – a pure constitutive ego and a constituted one. This last will lead to the genetic problem of the ego’s self-constitution from the deepest strata of passive instinctive life (unconscious and irrational) towards rational life in a teleological ascending movement that enacts the Kantian problem of reason’s finitude. Despite of the incorporation that Husserl makes of a teleology of Leibnizian type that resolves the Kantian hiatus between sensible and intelligible world, the Kant connoisseurs will recognize his tracks in the configuration of the Husserlian trascendental phenomenology.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/3782
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/3782
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/3782/pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Areté
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Areté
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Areté; Vol. 24 Núm. 2 (2012); 351-383
2223-3741
1016-913X
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1847243737583845376
score 13.1083765
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).