Social Responsibility of a Law Firm Specialized in the Criminal Area

Descripción del Articulo

In this article, the author questions the raison d'être of pro bono work, since it is possible that the assumption of these cases is part of an instrumental use to hide a certain professional practice carried out in legal studies. The criticism starts from a transversal analysis of public insti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Yon Ruesta, Roger
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2010
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/3030
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3030
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Pro Bono Cases
Social Responsibility
Law Firms
Public Institutions
Casos Pro Bono
Responsabilidad social
Estudios de Abogados
Instituciones Públicas
id REVPUCP_17b596ee9fd362eef4a202d41f23e35d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/3030
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Social Responsibility of a Law Firm Specialized in the Criminal Area
Responsabilidad social de un estudio de abogados especializado en materia penal
title Social Responsibility of a Law Firm Specialized in the Criminal Area
spellingShingle Social Responsibility of a Law Firm Specialized in the Criminal Area
Yon Ruesta, Roger
Pro Bono Cases
Social Responsibility
Law Firms
Public Institutions
Casos Pro Bono
Responsabilidad social
Estudios de Abogados
Instituciones Públicas
title_short Social Responsibility of a Law Firm Specialized in the Criminal Area
title_full Social Responsibility of a Law Firm Specialized in the Criminal Area
title_fullStr Social Responsibility of a Law Firm Specialized in the Criminal Area
title_full_unstemmed Social Responsibility of a Law Firm Specialized in the Criminal Area
title_sort Social Responsibility of a Law Firm Specialized in the Criminal Area
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Yon Ruesta, Roger
author Yon Ruesta, Roger
author_facet Yon Ruesta, Roger
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Pro Bono Cases
Social Responsibility
Law Firms
Public Institutions
Casos Pro Bono
Responsabilidad social
Estudios de Abogados
Instituciones Públicas
topic Pro Bono Cases
Social Responsibility
Law Firms
Public Institutions
Casos Pro Bono
Responsabilidad social
Estudios de Abogados
Instituciones Públicas
description In this article, the author questions the raison d'être of pro bono work, since it is possible that the assumption of these cases is part of an instrumental use to hide a certain professional practice carried out in legal studies. The criticism starts from a transversal analysis of public institutions, lawyers, universities, attorneys, and law practitioners. Regarding institutions, the author emphasizes the current system of public institutions in which corruption and impunity traditionally prevail. From this, he wields the attitude of social responsibility of the lawyer. Second, he exposes the professional practice of the lawyer in the cases that he defends and, above all, with what arguments he makes them. Third, he argues that there is a great academic responsibility of universities, not only to demand high academic performance from their professors, but qualities and values in their professional practice. Fourth, he points out that law firms should not only limit themselves to creating generic programs that are used as a declaration or letter of commitment to respect certain values; In the author's opinion, it would be better to choose a symbolic case of corruption and analyze it legally. In this way, it is announced that pro bono cases must configure an enforceable step in the line of social responsibility of the lawyer that not only covers the assumption of social cases, but also the academic level, in the level of professional practice, in the level internal institutional of the study to which it belongs. In conclusion, the need to expand the legal panorama and develop the social responsibility action of the lawyer in the different levels where he exercises his activity is highlighted, since this leads to the strengthening of public institutions.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-09-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3030
10.18800/derechopucp.201001.019
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3030
identifier_str_mv 10.18800/derechopucp.201001.019
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3030/3364
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCP
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCP
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Derecho PUCP; Núm. 64 (2010): Defensa de la Autonomía Universitaria. Responsabilidad Social de las Organizaciones; 333-344
2305-2546
0251-3420
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1840900746619387904
spelling Social Responsibility of a Law Firm Specialized in the Criminal AreaResponsabilidad social de un estudio de abogados especializado en materia penalYon Ruesta, RogerPro Bono CasesSocial ResponsibilityLaw FirmsPublic InstitutionsCasos Pro BonoResponsabilidad socialEstudios de AbogadosInstituciones PúblicasIn this article, the author questions the raison d'être of pro bono work, since it is possible that the assumption of these cases is part of an instrumental use to hide a certain professional practice carried out in legal studies. The criticism starts from a transversal analysis of public institutions, lawyers, universities, attorneys, and law practitioners. Regarding institutions, the author emphasizes the current system of public institutions in which corruption and impunity traditionally prevail. From this, he wields the attitude of social responsibility of the lawyer. Second, he exposes the professional practice of the lawyer in the cases that he defends and, above all, with what arguments he makes them. Third, he argues that there is a great academic responsibility of universities, not only to demand high academic performance from their professors, but qualities and values in their professional practice. Fourth, he points out that law firms should not only limit themselves to creating generic programs that are used as a declaration or letter of commitment to respect certain values; In the author's opinion, it would be better to choose a symbolic case of corruption and analyze it legally. In this way, it is announced that pro bono cases must configure an enforceable step in the line of social responsibility of the lawyer that not only covers the assumption of social cases, but also the academic level, in the level of professional practice, in the level internal institutional of the study to which it belongs. In conclusion, the need to expand the legal panorama and develop the social responsibility action of the lawyer in the different levels where he exercises his activity is highlighted, since this leads to the strengthening of public institutions.En el presente artículo el autor cuestiona la razón de ser del trabajo pro bono, al ser posible que la asunción de estos casos sea parte de un uso instrumental para ocultar una determinada práctica profesional realizada en los estudios jurídicos. La crítica parte un análisis trasversal a las instituciones públicas, los abogados, universidades, los procuradores, y los practicantes de Derecho. Respecto a las instituciones, el autor hace énfasis en el sistema actual de las instituciones públicas en las que tradicionalmente impera la corrupción e impunidad. A partir de ello, se esgrime la actitud de responsabilidad social del abogado. Segundo, expone sobre el ejercicio profesional del abogado frente a los casos que defiende y sobretodo con qué argumentos los realiza. Tercero, plantea que existe una gran responsabilidad academice de las universidades, no solamente para exigir un alto rendimiento académico por parte de sus profesores, sino cualidades y valores en su ejercicio profesional. Cuarto, señala que los estudios jurídicos no solo deben limitarse a crear programas genéricos que sean usados como declaración o carta de compromiso de respetar ciertos valores; en opinión del autor, sería mejor elegir un caso simbólico de corrupción y analizarlo jurídicamente. De esta manera, se anuncia que los casos pro bono deben configurar un peldaño exigible en la línea de responsabilidad social del abogado que no solo abarque la asunción de casos sociales, sino también el plano académico, en el plano del ejercicio profesional, en el plano institucional interno del estudio al que se pertenece. En conclusión, se resalta la necesidad de ampliar el panorama jurídico y desarrollar la acción de responsabilidad social del abogado en los diferentes planos en donde ejerce su actividad, pues ello conlleva al fortalecimiento de las instituciones públicas.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2010-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/303010.18800/derechopucp.201001.019Derecho PUCP; Núm. 64 (2010): Defensa de la Autonomía Universitaria. Responsabilidad Social de las Organizaciones; 333-3442305-25460251-3420reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3030/3364Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCPhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/30302025-01-14T22:54:09Z
score 13.477674
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).