The debate on the reform of arbitration as investor-State dispute settlement method and the alternatives of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court

Descripción del Articulo

Analyzes the current debate regarding the need for reform of arbitration as the preferred method to solve disputes between States and private investors, more specifically regarding the proposals of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court. It presents the novelty of bringing intern...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Urioste, Ricardo de
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/22827
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/22827
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:International investment law
international arbitration
international regime
investor-State dispute settlement
appellate mechanism
multilateral investment court
derecho internacional de las inversiones
arbitraje internacional
régimen internacional
solución de controversias inversionista-Estado
mecanismo de apelaciones
corte multilateral de inversiones
id REVPUCP_161af047ed9b471467b36f768ecd7cd4
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/22827
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling The debate on the reform of arbitration as investor-State dispute settlement method and the alternatives of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment courtEl debate sobre la reforma del arbitraje como método de solución de controversias entre Estados e inversionistas extranjeros y las alternativas de un mecanismo de apelaciones y una corte multilateral de inversionesUrioste, Ricardo deInternational investment lawinternational arbitrationinternational regimeinvestor-State dispute settlementappellate mechanismmultilateral investment courtderecho internacional de las inversionesarbitraje internacionalrégimen internacionalsolución de controversias inversionista-Estadomecanismo de apelacionescorte multilateral de inversionesAnalyzes the current debate regarding the need for reform of arbitration as the preferred method to solve disputes between States and private investors, more specifically regarding the proposals of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court. It presents the novelty of bringing international regime theory into that discussion in order to highlight the idea that the underlying political balance has shifted towards substantially less tolerance of ad-hoc arbitration as an efficient mechanism to solve investor-State disputes. It reviews the main arguments in favor and against of an appellate mechanism and concludes by suggesting how these considerations are necessary in order to reach a legitimate definition of Peru`s position regarding this issue in the current international debate.Analiza el debate actual respecto a la necesidad de la reforma del arbitraje como el método preferido para resolver disputas entre Estados e inversionistas privados, específicamente en lo concerniente a las propuestas respecto a un mecanismo de apelaciones y una corte multilateral de inversiones. Presenta la novedad de traer a la discusión la teoría sobre regímenes internacionales a fin de subrayar la idea que el balance político subyacente se ha movido hacia unnivel sustancialmente menor de tolerancia del arbitraje ad hoc como un mecanismo eficiente de resolución de disputas inversionista-Estado. Pasa revista a los principales argumentos a favor y en contra de un mecanismo de apelaciones y concluye sugiriendo cómo es que las consideraciones precedentes resultan necesarias a fin de alcanzar una legítima definición de la posición del Perú respecto a esta cuestión en el debate internacional actual.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2020-10-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/2282710.18800/agenda.202001.005Agenda Internacional; Vol. 27 Núm. 38 (2020); 105-1392311-57181027-6750reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/22827/21919http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/228272024-06-28T17:28:52Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The debate on the reform of arbitration as investor-State dispute settlement method and the alternatives of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court
El debate sobre la reforma del arbitraje como método de solución de controversias entre Estados e inversionistas extranjeros y las alternativas de un mecanismo de apelaciones y una corte multilateral de inversiones
title The debate on the reform of arbitration as investor-State dispute settlement method and the alternatives of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court
spellingShingle The debate on the reform of arbitration as investor-State dispute settlement method and the alternatives of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court
Urioste, Ricardo de
International investment law
international arbitration
international regime
investor-State dispute settlement
appellate mechanism
multilateral investment court
derecho internacional de las inversiones
arbitraje internacional
régimen internacional
solución de controversias inversionista-Estado
mecanismo de apelaciones
corte multilateral de inversiones
title_short The debate on the reform of arbitration as investor-State dispute settlement method and the alternatives of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court
title_full The debate on the reform of arbitration as investor-State dispute settlement method and the alternatives of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court
title_fullStr The debate on the reform of arbitration as investor-State dispute settlement method and the alternatives of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court
title_full_unstemmed The debate on the reform of arbitration as investor-State dispute settlement method and the alternatives of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court
title_sort The debate on the reform of arbitration as investor-State dispute settlement method and the alternatives of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Urioste, Ricardo de
author Urioste, Ricardo de
author_facet Urioste, Ricardo de
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv International investment law
international arbitration
international regime
investor-State dispute settlement
appellate mechanism
multilateral investment court
derecho internacional de las inversiones
arbitraje internacional
régimen internacional
solución de controversias inversionista-Estado
mecanismo de apelaciones
corte multilateral de inversiones
topic International investment law
international arbitration
international regime
investor-State dispute settlement
appellate mechanism
multilateral investment court
derecho internacional de las inversiones
arbitraje internacional
régimen internacional
solución de controversias inversionista-Estado
mecanismo de apelaciones
corte multilateral de inversiones
description Analyzes the current debate regarding the need for reform of arbitration as the preferred method to solve disputes between States and private investors, more specifically regarding the proposals of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court. It presents the novelty of bringing international regime theory into that discussion in order to highlight the idea that the underlying political balance has shifted towards substantially less tolerance of ad-hoc arbitration as an efficient mechanism to solve investor-State disputes. It reviews the main arguments in favor and against of an appellate mechanism and concludes by suggesting how these considerations are necessary in order to reach a legitimate definition of Peru`s position regarding this issue in the current international debate.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-16
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/22827
10.18800/agenda.202001.005
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/22827
identifier_str_mv 10.18800/agenda.202001.005
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/22827/21919
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Agenda Internacional; Vol. 27 Núm. 38 (2020); 105-139
2311-5718
1027-6750
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1836736819001032704
score 13.947759
The debate on the reform of arbitration as investor-State dispute settlement method and the alternatives of an appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares