Perceptions of organizational justice and ambivalent sexism: The moderating role of individualism-collectivism

Descripción del Articulo

The aim of the present study was to explore the association between perceptions of inter- personal/informational justice and ambivalent sexism among Argentinean employees, and to examine the possible role that collectivism and individualism exert on this association. Participants (128 men and 120 wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Vaamonde, Juan Diego, Omar, Alicia
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2017
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16094
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/16094
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Sexism
values
interpersonal justice
informational justice
sexismo
valores
justiça interpessoal
justiça informacional
id REVPUCP_14116c64521efe5f711dd82f94fb6c60
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16094
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Perceptions of organizational justice and ambivalent sexism: The moderating role of individualism-collectivismPercepciones de justicia organizacional y sexismo ambivalente: el rol moderador del individualismo-colectivismoPercepção de justiça organizacional e sexismo ambivalente: o papel moderador do individualismo-coletivismoVaamonde, Juan DiegoOmar, AliciaSexismvaluesinterpersonal justiceinformational justiceSexismvaluesinterpersonal justiceinformational justicesexismovaloresjustiça interpessoaljustiça informacionalThe aim of the present study was to explore the association between perceptions of inter- personal/informational justice and ambivalent sexism among Argentinean employees, and to examine the possible role that collectivism and individualism exert on this association. Participants (128 men and 120 women) completed a battery of instruments to measure the variables of interest. Results showed that perceptions of interpersonal and informational justice were negatively associated with hostile sexism, and that, unexpectedly, perceptions of informational justice were positively associated with benevolent sexism. Vertical collectivism and vertical individualism moderated the relationships between perceptions of interpersonal justice and hostile sexism. Findings are discussed in light of their theoretical and practical implications. Suggestions for future research are provided.El objetivo del estudio fue, por un lado, explorar las relaciones entre percepciones de jus- ticia interpersonal/informacional y sexismo ambivalente en empleados argentinos, y, por otro lado, examinar el posible rol que el individualismo y el colectivismo ejercen sobre tales relaciones. Los participantes (128 varones y 120 mujeres) completaron una batería de reconocidos instrumentos para medir las variables de interés. Los resultados mostraron que las percepciones de justicia interpersonal e informacional se relacionaron negativamente con sexismo hostil y que, inesperadamente, la justicia informacional se asoció positivamente con sexismo benévolo. Colectivismo vertical e individualismo vertical moderaron las rela- ciones entre justicia interpersonal y sexismo hostil. Se discuten las implicaciones teóricas y prácticas de estos hallazgos. Se sugieren futuras investigaciones en el área. Palabras clave: sexismo, valores, justicia interpersonal, justicia informacional O objetivo do presente estudo foi, por um lado, explorar as relações entre as percepções de justiça interpessoal/informacional e sexismo em trabalhadores argentinos, e, por outro lado, examinar o possível papel desempenhado pelo individualismo e coletivismo em tais relações. Os participantes (128 homens e 120 mulheres) completaram uma bateria de ins- trumentos reconhecidos para medir as variáveis de interesse. Os resultados mostraram que as percepções de justiça interpessoal e informacional foram negativamente relacionadas com o sexismo hostil e, inesperadamente, as percepções de justiça informacional foram positi- vamente associadas com o sexismo benevolente. O coletivismo vertical e o individualismo vertical moderaram as relações entre justiça interpersonal e sexismo hostil. Discutem-se as implicações teóricas e práticas destes resultados. Sugestões para futuras pesquisas são feitas.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2017-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/16094Revista de Psicología; Vol. 35 Núm. 1 (2017); 31-60Revista de Psicología; v. 35 n. 1 (2017); 31-602223-37330254-9247reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/16094/16516info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/160942021-07-10T19:15:08Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Perceptions of organizational justice and ambivalent sexism: The moderating role of individualism-collectivism
Percepciones de justicia organizacional y sexismo ambivalente: el rol moderador del individualismo-colectivismo
Percepção de justiça organizacional e sexismo ambivalente: o papel moderador do individualismo-coletivismo
title Perceptions of organizational justice and ambivalent sexism: The moderating role of individualism-collectivism
spellingShingle Perceptions of organizational justice and ambivalent sexism: The moderating role of individualism-collectivism
Vaamonde, Juan Diego
Sexism
values
interpersonal justice
informational justice
Sexism
values
interpersonal justice
informational justice
sexismo
valores
justiça interpessoal
justiça informacional
title_short Perceptions of organizational justice and ambivalent sexism: The moderating role of individualism-collectivism
title_full Perceptions of organizational justice and ambivalent sexism: The moderating role of individualism-collectivism
title_fullStr Perceptions of organizational justice and ambivalent sexism: The moderating role of individualism-collectivism
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of organizational justice and ambivalent sexism: The moderating role of individualism-collectivism
title_sort Perceptions of organizational justice and ambivalent sexism: The moderating role of individualism-collectivism
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vaamonde, Juan Diego
Omar, Alicia
author Vaamonde, Juan Diego
author_facet Vaamonde, Juan Diego
Omar, Alicia
author_role author
author2 Omar, Alicia
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Sexism
values
interpersonal justice
informational justice
Sexism
values
interpersonal justice
informational justice
sexismo
valores
justiça interpessoal
justiça informacional
topic Sexism
values
interpersonal justice
informational justice
Sexism
values
interpersonal justice
informational justice
sexismo
valores
justiça interpessoal
justiça informacional
description The aim of the present study was to explore the association between perceptions of inter- personal/informational justice and ambivalent sexism among Argentinean employees, and to examine the possible role that collectivism and individualism exert on this association. Participants (128 men and 120 women) completed a battery of instruments to measure the variables of interest. Results showed that perceptions of interpersonal and informational justice were negatively associated with hostile sexism, and that, unexpectedly, perceptions of informational justice were positively associated with benevolent sexism. Vertical collectivism and vertical individualism moderated the relationships between perceptions of interpersonal justice and hostile sexism. Findings are discussed in light of their theoretical and practical implications. Suggestions for future research are provided.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-14
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/16094
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/16094
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/16094/16516
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Psicología; Vol. 35 Núm. 1 (2017); 31-60
Revista de Psicología; v. 35 n. 1 (2017); 31-60
2223-3733
0254-9247
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1845975202823929856
score 13.376943
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).