The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity
Descripción del Articulo
The punitive populism is characterized by the popular demand for increased penalties and inflexibility in the normative criminal treatment of the accused (elimination of procedural and penitentiary benefits). This populism has fallen especially and palpably on the crime of the sexual violation of mi...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
Institución: | Poder Judicial del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/395 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | punitive populism sexual violation of minors life imprisonment jurisdictional activity fundamental rights populismo punitivo violación sexual en menores cadena perpetua actividad jurisdiccional derechos fundamentales |
id |
REVPJ_b3319e4ce09bd2ee8595ed534dbf8897 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/395 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPJ |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity El populismo punitivo en los delitos de violación sexual en menores y su incidencia en la actividad jurisdiccional penal |
title |
The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity |
spellingShingle |
The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity Huerta Molina, John Franck punitive populism sexual violation of minors life imprisonment jurisdictional activity fundamental rights populismo punitivo violación sexual en menores cadena perpetua actividad jurisdiccional derechos fundamentales |
title_short |
The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity |
title_full |
The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity |
title_fullStr |
The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity |
title_full_unstemmed |
The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity |
title_sort |
The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Huerta Molina, John Franck |
author |
Huerta Molina, John Franck |
author_facet |
Huerta Molina, John Franck |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
punitive populism sexual violation of minors life imprisonment jurisdictional activity fundamental rights populismo punitivo violación sexual en menores cadena perpetua actividad jurisdiccional derechos fundamentales |
topic |
punitive populism sexual violation of minors life imprisonment jurisdictional activity fundamental rights populismo punitivo violación sexual en menores cadena perpetua actividad jurisdiccional derechos fundamentales |
description |
The punitive populism is characterized by the popular demand for increased penalties and inflexibility in the normative criminal treatment of the accused (elimination of procedural and penitentiary benefits). This populism has fallen especially and palpably on the crime of the sexual violation of minors. The hardening of the legal and punitive treatment for the mentioned crime is notorious since in 2018 life imprisonment was extended. In addition, we have the prohibition of the application of procedural simplification through early termination or conclusion for crimes against sexual freedom, which degenerates the criminal process, delaying it, in many cases, unnecessarily. Likewise, the establishment of a life sentence eliminates the judge,s discretion for a proportional and reasonable application. But this has not been enough; the population demands harsher penalties such as chemical castration and the death penalty. The legislator has taken such demands and has repeatedly embodied them in bills, including most recently in March 2020. However, the question arises as to whether, if the death penalty is constitutionally accepted for the crimes of rape of minors, the judge will have the determination to apply it, since only applying the penalty of life imprisonment requires a qualified motivation with the unanimous decision of a collegiate court. Beyond that, what would it take to apply the death penalty? Certainly, the effects of punitive populism undermine the principles of criminal law, fundamental rights, as well as the performance of the judge in a constitutional rule of law. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-30 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395 10.35292/ropj.v13i15.395 |
url |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.35292/ropj.v13i15.395 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395/520 https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395/562 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 John Franck Huerta Molina https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 John Franck Huerta Molina https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 13 Núm. 15 (2021): Enero - Junio; 225-244 2663-9130 1997-6682 10.35292/ropj.v13i15 reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú instname:Poder Judicial del Perú instacron:PJ |
instname_str |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
instacron_str |
PJ |
institution |
PJ |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1844895029803352064 |
spelling |
The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activityEl populismo punitivo en los delitos de violación sexual en menores y su incidencia en la actividad jurisdiccional penalHuerta Molina, John Franckpunitive populismsexual violation of minorslife imprisonmentjurisdictional activityfundamental rightspopulismo punitivoviolación sexual en menorescadena perpetuaactividad jurisdiccionalderechos fundamentalesThe punitive populism is characterized by the popular demand for increased penalties and inflexibility in the normative criminal treatment of the accused (elimination of procedural and penitentiary benefits). This populism has fallen especially and palpably on the crime of the sexual violation of minors. The hardening of the legal and punitive treatment for the mentioned crime is notorious since in 2018 life imprisonment was extended. In addition, we have the prohibition of the application of procedural simplification through early termination or conclusion for crimes against sexual freedom, which degenerates the criminal process, delaying it, in many cases, unnecessarily. Likewise, the establishment of a life sentence eliminates the judge,s discretion for a proportional and reasonable application. But this has not been enough; the population demands harsher penalties such as chemical castration and the death penalty. The legislator has taken such demands and has repeatedly embodied them in bills, including most recently in March 2020. However, the question arises as to whether, if the death penalty is constitutionally accepted for the crimes of rape of minors, the judge will have the determination to apply it, since only applying the penalty of life imprisonment requires a qualified motivation with the unanimous decision of a collegiate court. Beyond that, what would it take to apply the death penalty? Certainly, the effects of punitive populism undermine the principles of criminal law, fundamental rights, as well as the performance of the judge in a constitutional rule of law.El populismo punitivo se caracteriza por la demanda popular del aumento de las penas y la inflexibilidad en el tratamiento normativo penal contra los procesados (eliminación de beneficios procesales y penitenciarios). Este populismo ha recaído de manera especial y palpable en el delito de violación sexual de menores. El endurecimiento en el tratamiento legal y punitivo para el precitado delito es notorio, pues en el 2018 se extendió la cadena perpetua. Aunado a ello, tenemos la prohibición de la aplicación de la simplificación procesal a través de la terminación o conclusión anticipada para los delitos contra la libertad sexual, lo cual degenera el proceso penal, dilatándolo, en cuantiosos casos, de manera innecesaria. Del mismo modo, el establecimiento de la pena tasada de la cadena perpetua elimina la discrecionalidad del juez para una aplicación proporcional y razonable. Pero ello no ha bastado, la población exige penas más severas como la castración química y la pena de muerte. El legislador ha tomado dichas pretensiones y las ha plasmado, en reiteradas ocasiones, en proyectos de ley, incluso recientemente en marzo de 2020. Sin embargo, cabe preguntarnos si es que al acogerse constitucionalmente la pena de muerte para los delitos de violación sexual de menores, el juez tendrá la determinación de aplicarla, puesto que solo aplicar la pena de cadena perpetua requiere una motivación cualificada con el fallo unánime de un juzgado colegiado. Además de ello, ¿qué se necesitaría para aplicar la pena de muerte? Ciertamente, los efectos del populismo punitivo merman los principios del derecho penal, los derechos fundamentales, así como la actuación del juez en un Estado constitucional de derecho.Poder Judicial del Perú2021-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/39510.35292/ropj.v13i15.395Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 13 Núm. 15 (2021): Enero - Junio; 225-2442663-91301997-668210.35292/ropj.v13i15reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perúinstname:Poder Judicial del Perúinstacron:PJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395/520https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395/562Derechos de autor 2021 John Franck Huerta Molinahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/3952023-09-29T17:16:59Z |
score |
13.02468 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).