The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity

Descripción del Articulo

The punitive populism is characterized by the popular demand for increased penalties and inflexibility in the normative criminal treatment of the accused (elimination of procedural and penitentiary benefits). This populism has fallen especially and palpably on the crime of the sexual violation of mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Huerta Molina, John Franck
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Poder Judicial del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/395
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:punitive populism
sexual violation of minors
life imprisonment
jurisdictional activity
fundamental rights
populismo punitivo
violación sexual en menores
cadena perpetua
actividad jurisdiccional
derechos fundamentales
id REVPJ_b3319e4ce09bd2ee8595ed534dbf8897
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/395
network_acronym_str REVPJ
network_name_str Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity
El populismo punitivo en los delitos de violación sexual en menores y su incidencia en la actividad jurisdiccional penal
title The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity
spellingShingle The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity
Huerta Molina, John Franck
punitive populism
sexual violation of minors
life imprisonment
jurisdictional activity
fundamental rights
populismo punitivo
violación sexual en menores
cadena perpetua
actividad jurisdiccional
derechos fundamentales
title_short The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity
title_full The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity
title_fullStr The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity
title_full_unstemmed The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity
title_sort The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activity
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Huerta Molina, John Franck
author Huerta Molina, John Franck
author_facet Huerta Molina, John Franck
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv punitive populism
sexual violation of minors
life imprisonment
jurisdictional activity
fundamental rights
populismo punitivo
violación sexual en menores
cadena perpetua
actividad jurisdiccional
derechos fundamentales
topic punitive populism
sexual violation of minors
life imprisonment
jurisdictional activity
fundamental rights
populismo punitivo
violación sexual en menores
cadena perpetua
actividad jurisdiccional
derechos fundamentales
description The punitive populism is characterized by the popular demand for increased penalties and inflexibility in the normative criminal treatment of the accused (elimination of procedural and penitentiary benefits). This populism has fallen especially and palpably on the crime of the sexual violation of minors. The hardening of the legal and punitive treatment for the mentioned crime is notorious since in 2018 life imprisonment was extended. In addition, we have the prohibition of the application of procedural simplification through early termination or conclusion for crimes against sexual freedom, which degenerates the criminal process, delaying it, in many cases, unnecessarily. Likewise, the establishment of a life sentence eliminates the judge,s discretion for a proportional and reasonable application. But this has not been enough; the population demands harsher penalties such as chemical castration and the death penalty. The legislator has taken such demands and has repeatedly embodied them in bills, including most recently in March 2020. However, the question arises as to whether, if the death penalty is constitutionally accepted for the crimes of rape of minors, the judge will have the determination to apply it, since only applying the penalty of life imprisonment requires a qualified motivation with the unanimous decision of a collegiate court. Beyond that, what would it take to apply the death penalty? Certainly, the effects of punitive populism undermine the principles of criminal law, fundamental rights, as well as the performance of the judge in a constitutional rule of law.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395
10.35292/ropj.v13i15.395
url https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395
identifier_str_mv 10.35292/ropj.v13i15.395
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395/520
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395/562
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 John Franck Huerta Molina
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 John Franck Huerta Molina
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 13 Núm. 15 (2021): Enero - Junio; 225-244
2663-9130
1997-6682
10.35292/ropj.v13i15
reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
instname:Poder Judicial del Perú
instacron:PJ
instname_str Poder Judicial del Perú
instacron_str PJ
institution PJ
reponame_str Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
collection Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844895029803352064
spelling The punitive populism in the crimes of sexual violation of minors and its impact on criminal jurisdictional activityEl populismo punitivo en los delitos de violación sexual en menores y su incidencia en la actividad jurisdiccional penalHuerta Molina, John Franckpunitive populismsexual violation of minorslife imprisonmentjurisdictional activityfundamental rightspopulismo punitivoviolación sexual en menorescadena perpetuaactividad jurisdiccionalderechos fundamentalesThe punitive populism is characterized by the popular demand for increased penalties and inflexibility in the normative criminal treatment of the accused (elimination of procedural and penitentiary benefits). This populism has fallen especially and palpably on the crime of the sexual violation of minors. The hardening of the legal and punitive treatment for the mentioned crime is notorious since in 2018 life imprisonment was extended. In addition, we have the prohibition of the application of procedural simplification through early termination or conclusion for crimes against sexual freedom, which degenerates the criminal process, delaying it, in many cases, unnecessarily. Likewise, the establishment of a life sentence eliminates the judge,s discretion for a proportional and reasonable application. But this has not been enough; the population demands harsher penalties such as chemical castration and the death penalty. The legislator has taken such demands and has repeatedly embodied them in bills, including most recently in March 2020. However, the question arises as to whether, if the death penalty is constitutionally accepted for the crimes of rape of minors, the judge will have the determination to apply it, since only applying the penalty of life imprisonment requires a qualified motivation with the unanimous decision of a collegiate court. Beyond that, what would it take to apply the death penalty? Certainly, the effects of punitive populism undermine the principles of criminal law, fundamental rights, as well as the performance of the judge in a constitutional rule of law.El populismo punitivo se caracteriza por la demanda popular del aumento de las penas y la inflexibilidad en el tratamiento normativo penal contra los procesados (eliminación de beneficios procesales y penitenciarios). Este populismo ha recaído de manera especial y palpable en el delito de violación sexual de menores. El endurecimiento en el tratamiento legal y punitivo para el precitado delito es notorio, pues en el 2018 se extendió la cadena perpetua. Aunado a ello, tenemos la prohibición de la aplicación de la simplificación procesal a través de la terminación o conclusión anticipada para los delitos contra la libertad sexual, lo cual degenera el proceso penal, dilatándolo, en cuantiosos casos, de manera innecesaria. Del mismo modo, el establecimiento de la pena tasada de la cadena perpetua elimina la discrecionalidad del juez para una aplicación proporcional y razonable. Pero ello no ha bastado, la población exige penas más severas como la castración química y la pena de muerte. El legislador ha tomado dichas pretensiones y las ha plasmado, en reiteradas ocasiones, en proyectos de ley, incluso recientemente en marzo de 2020. Sin embargo, cabe preguntarnos si es que al acogerse constitucionalmente la pena de muerte para los delitos de violación sexual de menores, el juez tendrá la determinación de aplicarla, puesto que solo aplicar la pena de cadena perpetua requiere una motivación cualificada con el fallo unánime de un juzgado colegiado. Además de ello, ¿qué se necesitaría para aplicar la pena de muerte? Ciertamente, los efectos del populismo punitivo merman los principios del derecho penal, los derechos fundamentales, así como la actuación del juez en un Estado constitucional de derecho.Poder Judicial del Perú2021-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/39510.35292/ropj.v13i15.395Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 13 Núm. 15 (2021): Enero - Junio; 225-2442663-91301997-668210.35292/ropj.v13i15reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perúinstname:Poder Judicial del Perúinstacron:PJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395/520https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/395/562Derechos de autor 2021 John Franck Huerta Molinahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/3952023-09-29T17:16:59Z
score 13.02468
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).