Exportación Completada — 

Conventional benefits: exclusivity of members or wage discrimination?

Descripción del Articulo

This study discusses the challenges faced by the Peruvian judiciary when the pending controversies are related to Collective Law institutes. Although there are multiple edges and obstacles that surround collective labor relations, the purpose of this article is to expose the problems circumscribed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Martínez Rivera, Maria Isabel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Poder Judicial del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/925
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/rdpt/article/view/925
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Conventional Benefits
Union Organization
Wage Discrimination
Freedom of Association
Collective Bargaining
Beneficios convencionales
Organización Sindical
Discriminación salarial
Libertad Sindical
Negociación Colectiva
Prestações convencionais
organização sindical
discriminação salarial
liberdade de associação
negociação colectiva
Descripción
Sumario:This study discusses the challenges faced by the Peruvian judiciary when the pending controversies are related to Collective Law institutes. Although there are multiple edges and obstacles that surround collective labor relations, the purpose of this article is to expose the problems circumscribed to the beneficiaries of collective bargaining agreements resulting from minority unions, as well as the granting of conventional benefits to former service providers and CAS workers with a judicially recognized and subsequent relationship. In order to deepen in the analysis of such a robust subject, the author starts by breaking down historical, theoretical and normative aspects, referring to legal institutions of collective law and their significant presence in labor relations; in addition, she includes dissimilar pronouncements of the Peruvian Supreme Court of Justice, in order to know its position on the scope and extension of collective bargaining agreements. By means of the referred methodology, it concludes that extending the scope of action of benefits of a conventional nature (derived from negotiations of minority unions), to those who do not have the status of members, places the permanence of the union organization in a risky position.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).