The civil judge's evidence initiative: An evil debate raised
Descripción del Articulo
To determine if the judge must or not have probatory initiative, meaning to have appointed proofs by the judge, radical positions must be left aside, this is limitless probatory initiative, or the absolute omission of the appointed proofs by the judge. The point is to look for a balance point where...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2008 |
| Institución: | Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/130 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/130 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | probatory initiative appointed proofs by the judge procedural guarantees iniciativa probatoria pruebas de oficio garantías procesales |
| id |
REVPJ_1a42b112f5dfd2d2af2b547fb89f83b6 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/130 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVPJ |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
The civil judge's evidence initiative: An evil debate raisedLa iniciativa probatoria del juez civil: Un debate mal planteadoPicó i Junoy, Joanprobatory initiativeappointed proofs by the judgeprocedural guaranteesiniciativa probatoriapruebas de oficiogarantías procesalesTo determine if the judge must or not have probatory initiative, meaning to have appointed proofs by the judge, radical positions must be left aside, this is limitless probatory initiative, or the absolute omission of the appointed proofs by the judge. The point is to look for a balance point where the attribution of the judge of appointed proofs requirement is limited assuring impartiality and protecting the right of defense of the litigants, searching for the respect of the procedural guarantees and also the effectiveness of the process.En la polémica sobre si el juez civil debe o no tener iniciativa probatoria, esto es, disponer pruebas de oficios, debe dejarse de lado posturas radicales, esto es, la iniciativa probatoria ilimitada o contrariamente la omisión absoluta a disponer pruebas de oficio. De lo que se trata es de buscar un punto de equilibrio en donde la atribución del juez de disponer pruebas de oficio sea limitada ,asegurando su imparcialidad y protegiendo el derecho de defensa de las partes, buscando al mismo tiempo el respeto de las garantías procesales, pero también la eficacia del proceso.Poder Judicial del Perú2008-05-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/13010.35292/ropj.v3i3.130Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol 3 No 3 (2008): January - June; 309-334Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2008): Enero - Junio; 309-334Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; v. 3 n. 3 (2008): Enero - Junio; 309-3342663-91301997-668210.35292/ropj.v3i3reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perúinstname:Poder Judicial del Perúinstacron:PJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/130/195info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/1302021-07-16T04:51:18Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The civil judge's evidence initiative: An evil debate raised La iniciativa probatoria del juez civil: Un debate mal planteado |
| title |
The civil judge's evidence initiative: An evil debate raised |
| spellingShingle |
The civil judge's evidence initiative: An evil debate raised Picó i Junoy, Joan probatory initiative appointed proofs by the judge procedural guarantees iniciativa probatoria pruebas de oficio garantías procesales |
| title_short |
The civil judge's evidence initiative: An evil debate raised |
| title_full |
The civil judge's evidence initiative: An evil debate raised |
| title_fullStr |
The civil judge's evidence initiative: An evil debate raised |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The civil judge's evidence initiative: An evil debate raised |
| title_sort |
The civil judge's evidence initiative: An evil debate raised |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Picó i Junoy, Joan |
| author |
Picó i Junoy, Joan |
| author_facet |
Picó i Junoy, Joan |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
probatory initiative appointed proofs by the judge procedural guarantees iniciativa probatoria pruebas de oficio garantías procesales |
| topic |
probatory initiative appointed proofs by the judge procedural guarantees iniciativa probatoria pruebas de oficio garantías procesales |
| description |
To determine if the judge must or not have probatory initiative, meaning to have appointed proofs by the judge, radical positions must be left aside, this is limitless probatory initiative, or the absolute omission of the appointed proofs by the judge. The point is to look for a balance point where the attribution of the judge of appointed proofs requirement is limited assuring impartiality and protecting the right of defense of the litigants, searching for the respect of the procedural guarantees and also the effectiveness of the process. |
| publishDate |
2008 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-05-23 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/130 10.35292/ropj.v3i3.130 |
| url |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/130 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.35292/ropj.v3i3.130 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/130/195 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol 3 No 3 (2008): January - June; 309-334 Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2008): Enero - Junio; 309-334 Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; v. 3 n. 3 (2008): Enero - Junio; 309-334 2663-9130 1997-6682 10.35292/ropj.v3i3 reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú instname:Poder Judicial del Perú instacron:PJ |
| instname_str |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
| instacron_str |
PJ |
| institution |
PJ |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
| collection |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1842360626298486784 |
| score |
12.660197 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
