The civil judge's evidence initiative: An evil debate raised

Descripción del Articulo

To determine if the judge must or not have probatory initiative, meaning to have appointed proofs by the judge, radical positions must be left aside, this is limitless probatory initiative, or the absolute omission of the appointed proofs by the judge. The point is to look for a balance point where...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Picó i Junoy, Joan
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2008
Institución:Poder Judicial del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/130
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/130
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:probatory initiative
appointed proofs by the judge
procedural guarantees
iniciativa probatoria
pruebas de oficio
garantías procesales
Descripción
Sumario:To determine if the judge must or not have probatory initiative, meaning to have appointed proofs by the judge, radical positions must be left aside, this is limitless probatory initiative, or the absolute omission of the appointed proofs by the judge. The point is to look for a balance point where the attribution of the judge of appointed proofs requirement is limited assuring impartiality and protecting the right of defense of the litigants, searching for the respect of the procedural guarantees and also the effectiveness of the process.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).