Political ideology and justification of the inequity in two samples of the city of Lima from opposing socioeconomic sectors

Descripción del Articulo

This research analyzes and compares the association between political ideology and justification of inequity in two samples from Lima, city, which are in different socio-economic situations: (a) a group with a very favorable economic situation and higher educative levels or postgraduate, which was c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Molina Guzmán, Juvenal, Rottenbacher de Rojas, Jan Marc
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Repositorio:Liberabit
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.ojs3.revistaliberabit.com:article/283
Enlace del recurso:http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/283
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Ideología política
inclusión social
autoritarismo
justificación de la inequidad
id REVLI_f84a4e5cdb3d33852c6edf2517ba385c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.ojs3.revistaliberabit.com:article/283
network_acronym_str REVLI
network_name_str Liberabit
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Political ideology and justification of the inequity in two samples of the city of Lima from opposing socioeconomic sectors
Ideología política y justificación de la inequidad en dos muestras limeñas de sectores socioeconómicos opuestos
Ideologia política e justificação da desigualdade em duas amostras de Lima de setores socioeconômicos opostos
title Political ideology and justification of the inequity in two samples of the city of Lima from opposing socioeconomic sectors
spellingShingle Political ideology and justification of the inequity in two samples of the city of Lima from opposing socioeconomic sectors
Molina Guzmán, Juvenal
Ideología política
inclusión social
autoritarismo
justificación de la inequidad
title_short Political ideology and justification of the inequity in two samples of the city of Lima from opposing socioeconomic sectors
title_full Political ideology and justification of the inequity in two samples of the city of Lima from opposing socioeconomic sectors
title_fullStr Political ideology and justification of the inequity in two samples of the city of Lima from opposing socioeconomic sectors
title_full_unstemmed Political ideology and justification of the inequity in two samples of the city of Lima from opposing socioeconomic sectors
title_sort Political ideology and justification of the inequity in two samples of the city of Lima from opposing socioeconomic sectors
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Molina Guzmán, Juvenal
Rottenbacher de Rojas, Jan Marc
author Molina Guzmán, Juvenal
author_facet Molina Guzmán, Juvenal
Rottenbacher de Rojas, Jan Marc
author_role author
author2 Rottenbacher de Rojas, Jan Marc
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ideología política
inclusión social
autoritarismo
justificación de la inequidad
topic Ideología política
inclusión social
autoritarismo
justificación de la inequidad
description This research analyzes and compares the association between political ideology and justification of inequity in two samples from Lima, city, which are in different socio-economic situations: (a) a group with a very favorable economic situation and higher educative levels or postgraduate, which was called socially advantaged group; and (b) a group in situation of poverty with technical studies as maximum, named socially disadvantaged group. The results show that the socially disadvantaged group presents higher scores in Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) and some of the dimensions of the justification of inequity. Furthermore, another important finding is that the socially disadvantaged group appears to show adifferent ideological organization in comparison with the socially advantaged group, which shows an ideological organization more consistent with the found in previous studies in urban areas.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/283
url http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/283
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/283/157
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2015 Juvenal Molina Guzmán, Jan Marc Rottenbacher de Rojas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2015 Juvenal Molina Guzmán, Jan Marc Rottenbacher de Rojas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de San Martín de Porres
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de San Martín de Porres
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2015): enero - junio; 21 - 36
LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2015): enero - junio; 21 - 36
LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2015): enero - junio; 21 - 36
2223-7666
1729-4827
reponame:Liberabit
instname:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instacron:USMP
instname_str Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instacron_str USMP
institution USMP
reponame_str Liberabit
collection Liberabit
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846887767949180928
spelling Political ideology and justification of the inequity in two samples of the city of Lima from opposing socioeconomic sectorsIdeología política y justificación de la inequidad en dos muestras limeñas de sectores socioeconómicos opuestosIdeologia política e justificação da desigualdade em duas amostras de Lima de setores socioeconômicos opostosMolina Guzmán, JuvenalRottenbacher de Rojas, Jan MarcIdeología políticainclusión socialautoritarismojustificación de la inequidadThis research analyzes and compares the association between political ideology and justification of inequity in two samples from Lima, city, which are in different socio-economic situations: (a) a group with a very favorable economic situation and higher educative levels or postgraduate, which was called socially advantaged group; and (b) a group in situation of poverty with technical studies as maximum, named socially disadvantaged group. The results show that the socially disadvantaged group presents higher scores in Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) and some of the dimensions of the justification of inequity. Furthermore, another important finding is that the socially disadvantaged group appears to show adifferent ideological organization in comparison with the socially advantaged group, which shows an ideological organization more consistent with the found in previous studies in urban areas.Este estudio analiza y compara la relación entre la ideología política y la justificación de la inequidad en dos muestras de la ciudad de Lima que se encuentran en situaciones socioeconómicas diferentes: (a) un grupo con una situación económica bastante favorable y niveles educativos universitarios o de posgrado, que fue denominado socialmente favorecido y (b) un grupo en situación de pobreza y con estudios técnicos como máximo, que fue denominado socialmente desfavorecido. Los resultados muestran que el grupo socialmente desfavorecido presenta mayores puntuaciones en el Autoritarismo de ala derecha (RWA) y en algunas de las dimensiones de la justificación de la inequidad. Otro hallazgo importante es que el grupo socialmente desfavorecido parece mostrar una organización ideológica diferente a la que presenta el grupo socialmente favorecido, el mismo que muestra una organización ideológica más consistente con lo encontrado en estudios previos en el ámbito urbano.Este estudo analisa e compara a relação entre a ideologia política e a justificação da desigualdade em duas amostras da cidade de Lima que estão em diferentes situações socioeconômicas: (a) um grupo com situação econômica bastante favorável e níveis de ensino universitário ou universitário. pós-graduação, que foi denominada socialmente favorecida e (b) um grupo em situação de pobreza e com estudos técnicos máximos, que se denominou socialmente desfavorecido. Os resultados mostram que o grupo socialmente desfavorecido tem maiores pontuações no autoritarismo de direita (RWA) e em algumas das dimensões da justificação da desigualdade. Outra constatação importante é que o grupo socialmente desfavorecido parece mostrar uma organização ideológica diferente daquela do grupo socialmente favorecido, o que mostra uma organização ideológica mais consistente com aquela encontrada em estudos anteriores na esfera urbana.Universidad de San Martín de Porres2015-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/283LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2015): enero - junio; 21 - 36LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2015): enero - junio; 21 - 36LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2015): enero - junio; 21 - 362223-76661729-4827reponame:Liberabitinstname:Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstacron:USMPspahttp://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/283/157Derechos de autor 2015 Juvenal Molina Guzmán, Jan Marc Rottenbacher de Rojashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.ojs3.revistaliberabit.com:article/2832019-06-18T00:42:01Z
score 12.636967
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).