Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus technique for labour analgesia: cohort study
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: Neuroaxial analgesia is the most effective technique to treat labor pain, however, there are still concerns regarding the undesirable effects. Objective: To evaluate the association between epidural analgesia maintained by programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PEIB) and maternal perin...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
| Institución: | Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal |
| Repositorio: | Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe:article/194 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe/index.php/rpinmp/article/view/194 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| id |
REVINMP_e7f395371ca93241cde4e67b9028295c |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe:article/194 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVINMP |
| network_name_str |
Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus technique for labour analgesia: cohort study Bolos epidurales intermitentes programados para mantenimiento de la analgesia del trabajo de parto: Estudio observacional, analítico de tipo cohorte |
| title |
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus technique for labour analgesia: cohort study |
| spellingShingle |
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus technique for labour analgesia: cohort study Calderón Lozano, Marjorie Lisseth |
| title_short |
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus technique for labour analgesia: cohort study |
| title_full |
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus technique for labour analgesia: cohort study |
| title_fullStr |
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus technique for labour analgesia: cohort study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus technique for labour analgesia: cohort study |
| title_sort |
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus technique for labour analgesia: cohort study |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Calderón Lozano, Marjorie Lisseth Moreno Gonzales, Renato Segura Pinedo, Dante Vásquez Rojas, Gunther Arenas Velásquez, Anibal |
| author |
Calderón Lozano, Marjorie Lisseth |
| author_facet |
Calderón Lozano, Marjorie Lisseth Moreno Gonzales, Renato Segura Pinedo, Dante Vásquez Rojas, Gunther Arenas Velásquez, Anibal |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Moreno Gonzales, Renato Segura Pinedo, Dante Vásquez Rojas, Gunther Arenas Velásquez, Anibal |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| description |
Objective: Neuroaxial analgesia is the most effective technique to treat labor pain, however, there are still concerns regarding the undesirable effects. Objective: To evaluate the association between epidural analgesia maintained by programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PEIB) and maternal perinatal complications. Materials and methods: Observational, analytical study of Cohort type in pregnant women between 18 and 35 years, in labor with cervical dilation of 4 centimeters or more, grouped in two cohorts according to administration or not of epidural analgesia: In pregnant women of Group A, administered bolus epidural analgesia, with maintenance by BEIP with bupivacaine 0.0625% and fentanyl 25 ug in 10cc every 60 minutes; in pregnant women of group B, epidural analgesia was not administered. Results: The duration of the dilation and expulsion period was longer in the group that received epidural analgesia of (532.91 ± 254 minutes) and (429.19 ± 311 minutes) in which they did not receive; the time of the expulsion period was (16.97 ± 16 minutes) and (11.76 ± 10 minutes) in group B, (p <0.05); lower incidence of first degree perineal tears in the group that received analgesia (16.12% VS 25.35%; p = 0.014). No differences were found in the route of completion of labor, APGAR score, need for neonatal resuscitation and admission to Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Conclusions: Pregnant women who received epidural analgesia through BEIP had a longer duration of the period of dilation and expulsion, less incidence of perineal tears, without increasing neonatal morbidity. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-02 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe/index.php/rpinmp/article/view/194 10.33421/inmp.2020194 |
| url |
https://investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe/index.php/rpinmp/article/view/194 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.33421/inmp.2020194 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe/index.php/rpinmp/article/view/194/207 https://investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe/index.php/rpinmp/article/view/194/210 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal (INMP), Lima - Perú. |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal (INMP), Lima - Perú. |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2020): Peruvian Journal of Maternal Perinatal Research; 28-34 Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2020): Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal; 28-34 2663-113X 2305-3887 10.33421/93 reponame:Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal instname:Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal instacron:INMP |
| instname_str |
Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal |
| instacron_str |
INMP |
| institution |
INMP |
| reponame_str |
Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal |
| collection |
Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1852496616774172672 |
| spelling |
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus technique for labour analgesia: cohort studyBolos epidurales intermitentes programados para mantenimiento de la analgesia del trabajo de parto: Estudio observacional, analítico de tipo cohorteCalderón Lozano, Marjorie LissethMoreno Gonzales, RenatoSegura Pinedo, DanteVásquez Rojas, GuntherArenas Velásquez, AnibalObjective: Neuroaxial analgesia is the most effective technique to treat labor pain, however, there are still concerns regarding the undesirable effects. Objective: To evaluate the association between epidural analgesia maintained by programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PEIB) and maternal perinatal complications. Materials and methods: Observational, analytical study of Cohort type in pregnant women between 18 and 35 years, in labor with cervical dilation of 4 centimeters or more, grouped in two cohorts according to administration or not of epidural analgesia: In pregnant women of Group A, administered bolus epidural analgesia, with maintenance by BEIP with bupivacaine 0.0625% and fentanyl 25 ug in 10cc every 60 minutes; in pregnant women of group B, epidural analgesia was not administered. Results: The duration of the dilation and expulsion period was longer in the group that received epidural analgesia of (532.91 ± 254 minutes) and (429.19 ± 311 minutes) in which they did not receive; the time of the expulsion period was (16.97 ± 16 minutes) and (11.76 ± 10 minutes) in group B, (p <0.05); lower incidence of first degree perineal tears in the group that received analgesia (16.12% VS 25.35%; p = 0.014). No differences were found in the route of completion of labor, APGAR score, need for neonatal resuscitation and admission to Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Conclusions: Pregnant women who received epidural analgesia through BEIP had a longer duration of the period of dilation and expulsion, less incidence of perineal tears, without increasing neonatal morbidity.Objetivo: Evaluar la asociación entre analgesia epidural mantenida mediante Bolos epidurales intermitentes programados (BEIP) y las complicaciones materno-perinatales. Materiales y Métodos: Estudio de tipo Cohorte en gestantes entre 18 y 35 años, en trabajo de parto con dilatación cervical de 4 centímetros o más, agrupadas en dos cohortes según administración o no de analgesia epidural: En las gestantes del Grupo A, se administró analgesia epidural en bolo, con mantenimiento mediante BEIP con bupivacaína 0.0625% y fentanilo 25 ug en 10cc cada 60 minutos; en las gestantes del grupo B, no se administró analgesia epidural. Resultados: La duración del periodo de dilatación y expulsivo fue mayor en el grupo que recibió analgesia epidural de (532.91 ± 254 minutos) y de (429.19 ± 311 minutos) en el que no recibió; el tiempo del periodo expulsivo fue (16.97 ± 16 minutos) y (11.76 ± 10 minutos) en el grupo B, (p < 0.05); menor incidencia de desgarros perineales de primer grado en el grupo que recibió analgesia (16.12 % VS 25.35%; p=0.014). No se encontraron diferencias en la vía de culminación del parto, puntuación de APGAR, necesidad de reanimación neonatal e ingreso a Unidad de cuidados intensivos neonatales (UCIN). Conclusiones: Las gestantes que recibieron analgesia epidural mediante BEIP tuvieron una mayor duración del periodo de dilatación y del expulsivo, menor incidencia de desgarros perineales, sin incrementar la morbilidad neonatal. Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal (INMP), Lima - Perú.2020-12-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe/index.php/rpinmp/article/view/19410.33421/inmp.2020194Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2020): Peruvian Journal of Maternal Perinatal Research; 28-34Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2020): Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal; 28-342663-113X2305-388710.33421/93reponame:Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatalinstname:Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatalinstacron:INMPspahttps://investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe/index.php/rpinmp/article/view/194/207https://investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe/index.php/rpinmp/article/view/194/210Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe:article/1942024-10-31T05:55:17Z |
| score |
13.415866 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).