Experience in the surgical treatment of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma at the Hospital de Especialidades No. 2 "Lic. Luis Donaldo Colosio Murrieta", Mexican Social Security Institute, Ciudad Obregón, Sonora

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To present our experience and assess the recurrence of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma after a surgical treatment (open versus endoscopic approach) in the country’s northwestern Department of Otorhinolaryngology. Materials and methods: An observational, retrospective, analytical stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Rubio-Espinoza, A., Lugo-Machado, J. A., Méndez-Cázares, J. A., González-Quintana, J. E., Portillo-Flores, J. A.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Repositorio:Horizonte médico
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:horizontemedico.usmp.edu.pe:article/778
Enlace del recurso:https://www.horizontemedico.usmp.edu.pe/index.php/horizontemed/article/view/778
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Angiofibroma
Neoplasias nasofaríngeas
Recurrencia
Embolización
Nasopharyngeal neoplasms
Recurrence
Embolization
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To present our experience and assess the recurrence of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma after a surgical treatment (open versus endoscopic approach) in the country’s northwestern Department of Otorhinolaryngology. Materials and methods: An observational, retrospective, analytical study. The medical records of patients diagnosed with juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma, who were treated at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery of this institution from 2014 to 2017, were reviewed. Results: A total of 19 patients diagnosed with juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma underwent a surgical procedure, out of which 14 had an open surgery and 5 an endoscopic one. Recurrence accounted for 50 % and 40 %, respectively, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.88). However, other variables were compared, such as the need for admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), which was represented by 71 % in the case of the open approach and 20 % for the endoscopic approach, where a significant difference was found (p = 0.04). Conclusions: The study shows no statistically significant advantage of the endoscopic approach versus the open approach, but demonstrates less need for ICU admissions, which would reduce healthcare costs.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).