“Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets

Descripción del Articulo

Purpose. This paper aims to provide an overall review and assessment of the virtues and flaws of decentralized self-regulated markets, discussing in particular the extent to which deceiving attitudes by some market participants might be potentially diluted and contradicted. Design/methodology/approa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Gomes, Orlando, Frade, João
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad ESAN
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad ESAN
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/75
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/75
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Markets
Deception
Morality
Purchasing decisions
Preferences
Rumour spreading
id REVESAN_ee3e647d9451706b1d13a29ddff04b34
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/75
network_acronym_str REVESAN
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad ESAN
repository_id_str .
spelling “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized marketsGomes, Orlando Frade, João MarketsDeceptionMoralityPurchasing decisionsPreferencesRumour spreadingPurpose. This paper aims to provide an overall review and assessment of the virtues and flaws of decentralized self-regulated markets, discussing in particular the extent to which deceiving attitudes by some market participants might be potentially diluted and contradicted. Design/methodology/approach. To approach deception and morality in markets, the paper follows two paths. First, the relevant recent literature on the theme is reviewed, examined and debated, and second, one constructs a simulation model equipped with the required elements to discuss the immediate and longterm impacts of deceiving behaviour over market outcomes. Findings. The discussion and the model allow for highlighting the main drivers of the purchasing decisions of consumers and for evaluating how they react to manipulating behaviour by firms in the market. Agents pursuing short-run gains through unfair market practices are likely to be punished as fooled agents spread the word about the malpractices they were allegedly subject to. Research limitations/implications. Markets are complex entities, where large numbers of individual agents typically establish local and direct contact with one another. These agents differ in many respects and interact in unpredictable ways. Assembling a concise model capable of addressing such complexity is a difficult task. The framework proposed in this paper points in the intended direction. Originality/value. The debate in this paper contributes to a stronger perception on the mechanisms that attribute robustness and vitality to markets. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-04-2018-0032Universidad ESAN2019-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/75Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 24 No. 48 (2019): July - December; 312-326Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 24 Núm. 48 (2019): July - December; 312-3262218-06482077-1886reponame:Revistas - Universidad ESANinstname:Universidad ESANinstacron:ESANenghttps://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/75/58Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciencehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/752021-06-20T00:04:37Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
title “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
spellingShingle “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
Gomes, Orlando
Markets
Deception
Morality
Purchasing decisions
Preferences
Rumour spreading
title_short “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
title_full “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
title_fullStr “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
title_full_unstemmed “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
title_sort “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gomes, Orlando
Frade, João
author Gomes, Orlando
author_facet Gomes, Orlando
Frade, João
author_role author
author2 Frade, João
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Markets
Deception
Morality
Purchasing decisions
Preferences
Rumour spreading
topic Markets
Deception
Morality
Purchasing decisions
Preferences
Rumour spreading
description Purpose. This paper aims to provide an overall review and assessment of the virtues and flaws of decentralized self-regulated markets, discussing in particular the extent to which deceiving attitudes by some market participants might be potentially diluted and contradicted. Design/methodology/approach. To approach deception and morality in markets, the paper follows two paths. First, the relevant recent literature on the theme is reviewed, examined and debated, and second, one constructs a simulation model equipped with the required elements to discuss the immediate and longterm impacts of deceiving behaviour over market outcomes. Findings. The discussion and the model allow for highlighting the main drivers of the purchasing decisions of consumers and for evaluating how they react to manipulating behaviour by firms in the market. Agents pursuing short-run gains through unfair market practices are likely to be punished as fooled agents spread the word about the malpractices they were allegedly subject to. Research limitations/implications. Markets are complex entities, where large numbers of individual agents typically establish local and direct contact with one another. These agents differ in many respects and interact in unpredictable ways. Assembling a concise model capable of addressing such complexity is a difficult task. The framework proposed in this paper points in the intended direction. Originality/value. The debate in this paper contributes to a stronger perception on the mechanisms that attribute robustness and vitality to markets. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-04-2018-0032
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/75
url https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/75
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/75/58
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad ESAN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad ESAN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 24 No. 48 (2019): July - December; 312-326
Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 24 Núm. 48 (2019): July - December; 312-326
2218-0648
2077-1886
reponame:Revistas - Universidad ESAN
instname:Universidad ESAN
instacron:ESAN
instname_str Universidad ESAN
instacron_str ESAN
institution ESAN
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad ESAN
collection Revistas - Universidad ESAN
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1868440413513187328
score 12.821158
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).