Contratos náuticos y estructura fractal de las normas jurídicas (fletamento vs. transporte marítimo de mercancías: del contrato, a la institución)

Descripción del Articulo

The classic question referring the limits between the different tipes of maritime contracts,and -concretely- between Freightments and Contracts of Carriage of Goods bySea frequently suffers or is submitted to sudden turns and twists, during the process ofspanish Maritime Law Reform. The Proposal of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Garcia Pita, José Luis
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad de Piura
Repositorio:Revista de Derecho
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/1574
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/1574
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Fletamento
transporte marítimo de mercancías
contrato de volumen o tonelaje
libertad contractual
contrato
institución
geometría fractal
semilla del objeto fractal
Freightment
carriage of goods
tonnage or volume agreement
freedom of contract
contract
institution
fractal geometry
seed of fractal object
Descripción
Sumario:The classic question referring the limits between the different tipes of maritime contracts,and -concretely- between Freightments and Contracts of Carriage of Goods bySea frequently suffers or is submitted to sudden turns and twists, during the process ofspanish Maritime Law Reform. The Proposal of a new General Act, proposed by Socialistsparliamentary Group, which is -“ad pedem litterae”- the same that the older 2008/Project, defines the “Freightment Contract” [Contrato de Fletamento] in terms of full andabsolute identification or equalization with the Contrac of Carriage of Goods by Sea, withthe self-evident purpose of making the Owner -which is called “Carrier”- liable for thecarriage and custody of the goods on board, and thus erasing completely the older figureof the “Contrato de Fletamento” [Freightment], as a contract for the furniture of navigationservices, for others´ account and under other’s instructions. It is done, this way, a “tabularasa” of contractual Shipowner’s will, substituing his consent in obligating to carry andcustody the goods by some kind of “receptum” or “involuntary bailment”, with deep rootsin English Law, that distorts the nature of Freightment and Transport [or Carriage], ascontracts, fruit of the private will and of his legitimate auto-normative power
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).