On the Methodologies of Private International Law: A Contribution to Their Study within the Framework of the Uruguayan Legal System

Descripción del Articulo

The various multinational situations, i.e., those private relationships with foreign elements susceptible to regulation by Private International Law, can be dealt with by means of different techniques and methods, according to the fair solutions that the legislator considers appropriate for each par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ferreira Marino , Alejandro Matías, Pereira Fantoni , Verónica
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Universidad de Piura
Repositorio:Revista de Derecho
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/3848
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/3848
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:territorialismo
normas de aplicación inmediata o necesaria
conflictualismo bilateral
unilateral
lex fori
territorialism
rules of immediate or necessary application
bilateral conflictualism
Descripción
Sumario:The various multinational situations, i.e., those private relationships with foreign elements susceptible to regulation by Private International Law, can be dealt with by means of different techniques and methods, according to the fair solutions that the legislator considers appropriate for each particular case. In our discipline, this issue is known as “the question of methods”. The present research aims to carry out a detailed analysis of the three main methods of resolution in the field of Private International Law, with a special focus on the Uruguayan legal framework. In Uruguay, most of the provisions follow the conflict method in its bilateral form, as established in the Montevideo treaties of 1889 and 1940 and in various inter-American conventions. However, with the enactment of Law 19.920, a significant methodological renewal is introduced in the treatment of multinational cases, incorporating rules of immediate or necessary application and adopting unilateral criteria. Thus, a study of the question of methods in the light of this new regulation, which represents an advance in the Uruguayan approach to international private relations, is indispensable.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).