The ratification of judges in Peru: Is it compatible with judicial independence?

• Autor: Figueroa Gutarra, Edwin
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2020
• Institución: Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
• Repositorio: Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/188
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/188
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: judicial independence; ratification of judges; partial evaluation of judges; inter-American human rights system; proportionality test; independencia judicial; ratificación de jueces; evaluación parcial de jueces; Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos; test de proporcionalidad

The judges ratification regime, every seven years since the beginning of the judicial career in Peru, has become a complex reality. Added to this is the configuration of a new modality of partial evaluation of judges, every three and a half years. We seek to unravel that these figures are incompatible with the principle of judicial independence, the same as that in Comparative Law is expressed in a statute of indefinite appointment to the position of judge.