Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Peruvian Neurology Society. Short Version

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Methods: a guideline development group (GEG) was formed that included specialized physicians in the fields of neurology, neuropediatrics, genetics, and methodology. The GEG a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Martínez-Esteban, Peggy, Guillén-Pinto, Daniel, Duran-Padros, Alfredo Alfonso, Koc-Gonzales , Daniel, Flores-Bravo, Julio, Méndez-Dávalos, Carlos, Suyo Suyo-Suyo , Caroll, Espíritu-Rojas, Elizabeth R., Caballero-Bedón, Nathaly, Chávez-Pasco, Vilma Giuliana, Granados-Guibovich , Katia, Graña-Espinoza, Jessica Milagros, Celis-García, Luis E., Alva-Diaz, Carlos
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Colegio Médico del Perú
Repositorio:Acta Médica Peruana
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2376
Enlace del recurso:https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2376
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Muscular Dystrophy
Duchenne
Muscular Dystrophies
Practice Guideline
GRADE Approach
Evidence-Based Medicine
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Methods: a guideline development group (GEG) was formed that included specialized physicians in the fields of neurology, neuropediatrics, genetics, and methodology. The GEG asked eight clinical questions to be answered by recommendations in this clinical practice guidelines (CPG). We conducted a systematic search and - when deemed relevant - primary studies in Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials during 2021 were reviewed. Evidence was selected to answer each of the clinical questions posed. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. In periodic work meetings, the GEG used the GRADE methodology to review the evidence and formulate recommendations, points of good clinical practice, and a diagnosis and treatment flowchart. Results: this CPG addressed eight clinical questions, divided into three topics: screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Based on these questions, fifteen recommendations were formulated (10 strong, 5 conditional) and 11 points for good clinical practice. Conclusion: this paper summarizes the methodology and evidence-based conclusions of the CPG for the diagnosis and treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.  
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).