THOUGHTS ABOUT THE POET’S PROFESSION IN CASA NUESTRA (1965) BY MARCO MARTOS

Descripción del Articulo

This article aims to identify and analyze the meta-poetic thoughts expressed in Casa nuestra (1965) by Marco Martos. For this purpose, a corpus of poems will be interpreted through the methodological tools proposed by Stefano Arduini regarding figurative fields, as well as the categories regarding r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Morales Herrera, Raúl
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.www.metaforarevista.com:article/192
Enlace del recurso:https://www.metaforarevista.com/index.php/meta/article/view/192
id REVAPR_6398d2f8c9cfda3f7217df713ab55534
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.www.metaforarevista.com:article/192
network_acronym_str REVAPR
network_name_str Metáfora
repository_id_str
spelling THOUGHTS ABOUT THE POET’S PROFESSION IN CASA NUESTRA (1965) BY MARCO MARTOSREFLEXIONES SOBRE EL OFICIO DEL POETA EN CASA NUESTRA (1965) DE MARCO MARTOSMorales Herrera, RaúlThis article aims to identify and analyze the meta-poetic thoughts expressed in Casa nuestra (1965) by Marco Martos. For this purpose, a corpus of poems will be interpreted through the methodological tools proposed by Stefano Arduini regarding figurative fields, as well as the categories regarding rhetoric and argumentation proposed by Chaïm Perelman, the concept of ethos proposed by Ruth Amossy and the concept of style proposed by García-Bedoya. Thus, it will be shown that the selected corpus presents a consistent speaker who poetizes his intimate and personal thoughts about his job as a poet, his motivations, his relationship with the collective and the external expectations about his poetic work.El presente artículo tiene como finalidad identificar y analizar las reflexiones meta-poéticas expresadas en el poemario Casa nuestra (1965) de Marco Martos. Para ello, se interpretará un corpus de poemas a través de las herramientas metodológicas planteadas por Stefano Arduini respecto a los campos figurativos, así como las categorías respecto a la retórica y la argumentación propuestas por Chaïm Perelman, el concepto de ethos de Ruth Amossy y el concepto de estilo rescatado por García-Bedoya. De esta manera, se evidenciará cómo el corpus seleccionado presenta un locutor consistente que poetiza sus reflexiones íntimas y personales acerca de su oficio como poeta, sus motivaciones, su relación con el colectivo y las expectativas exteriores acerca de su labor poética.Asociación Peruana de Retórica2021-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.metaforarevista.com/index.php/meta/article/view/19210.36286/mrlad.v3i6.100METÁFORA REVISTA DE LITERATURA Y ANÁLISIS DEL DISCURSO; Vol. 4 Núm. 7 (2021)2617-4839spahttps://www.metaforarevista.com/index.php/meta/article/view/192/159Derechos de autor 2021 Raúl Morales Herrerahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0oai:ojs2.www.metaforarevista.com:article/1922022-03-25T01:44:33Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THOUGHTS ABOUT THE POET’S PROFESSION IN CASA NUESTRA (1965) BY MARCO MARTOS
REFLEXIONES SOBRE EL OFICIO DEL POETA EN CASA NUESTRA (1965) DE MARCO MARTOS
title THOUGHTS ABOUT THE POET’S PROFESSION IN CASA NUESTRA (1965) BY MARCO MARTOS
spellingShingle THOUGHTS ABOUT THE POET’S PROFESSION IN CASA NUESTRA (1965) BY MARCO MARTOS
Morales Herrera, Raúl
title_short THOUGHTS ABOUT THE POET’S PROFESSION IN CASA NUESTRA (1965) BY MARCO MARTOS
title_full THOUGHTS ABOUT THE POET’S PROFESSION IN CASA NUESTRA (1965) BY MARCO MARTOS
title_fullStr THOUGHTS ABOUT THE POET’S PROFESSION IN CASA NUESTRA (1965) BY MARCO MARTOS
title_full_unstemmed THOUGHTS ABOUT THE POET’S PROFESSION IN CASA NUESTRA (1965) BY MARCO MARTOS
title_sort THOUGHTS ABOUT THE POET’S PROFESSION IN CASA NUESTRA (1965) BY MARCO MARTOS
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Morales Herrera, Raúl
author Morales Herrera, Raúl
author_facet Morales Herrera, Raúl
author_role author
description This article aims to identify and analyze the meta-poetic thoughts expressed in Casa nuestra (1965) by Marco Martos. For this purpose, a corpus of poems will be interpreted through the methodological tools proposed by Stefano Arduini regarding figurative fields, as well as the categories regarding rhetoric and argumentation proposed by Chaïm Perelman, the concept of ethos proposed by Ruth Amossy and the concept of style proposed by García-Bedoya. Thus, it will be shown that the selected corpus presents a consistent speaker who poetizes his intimate and personal thoughts about his job as a poet, his motivations, his relationship with the collective and the external expectations about his poetic work.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.metaforarevista.com/index.php/meta/article/view/192
10.36286/mrlad.v3i6.100
url https://www.metaforarevista.com/index.php/meta/article/view/192
identifier_str_mv 10.36286/mrlad.v3i6.100
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.metaforarevista.com/index.php/meta/article/view/192/159
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Raúl Morales Herrera
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Raúl Morales Herrera
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Asociación Peruana de Retórica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Asociación Peruana de Retórica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv METÁFORA REVISTA DE LITERATURA Y ANÁLISIS DEL DISCURSO; Vol. 4 Núm. 7 (2021)
2617-4839
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1741978178015985664
score 13.871978
THOUGHTS ABOUT THE POET’S PROFESSION IN CASA NUESTRA (1965) BY MARCO MARTOS
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares