La reintegración política de los ex miembros de grupos alzados en armas que no firmaron un acuerdo de paz. Un estudio comparado entre el PCP-Sendero Luminoso, el Movimiento de Liberación Nacional - Tupamaros (MLN-T) y Montoneros
Descripción del Articulo
This work aims to compare the characteristics of the political reintegration —after the end of the period of political violence— of the former members of the insurgents groups Communist Party of Peru - Shining Path (PCP-SL), National Liberation Movement - Tupamaros (MLN-T) and Montoneros, in order t...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | tesis de maestría |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2024 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | PUCP-Tesis |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:tesis.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.12404/29767 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/29767 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Organización Montoneros (Argentina) Sendero Luminoso--Perú Movimiento de liberación nacional--Uruguay Resocialización https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.06.00 |
Sumario: | This work aims to compare the characteristics of the political reintegration —after the end of the period of political violence— of the former members of the insurgents groups Communist Party of Peru - Shining Path (PCP-SL), National Liberation Movement - Tupamaros (MLN-T) and Montoneros, in order to answer the question about what were the factors that determined the particularities of the reintegration process of each of these organizations. After a historical analysis we conclude that there were three central components that were key in the political reintegration of each of the organizations, all of them developed during the time of transition to democracy in Peru, Uruguay and Argentina, respectively —which functioned as a critical juncture—. These factors influenced on the existence or not of a political reintegration of the armed groups and determined the particularities of this process for each of the organizations. Thus, the three central factors were the opportunities and external obstacles for the political action of the organizations that concern us; their mobilization structures, and the framing processes of societies during the transition. Likewise, we found that the decisions and actions taken by political actors during the transitions to democracy —when a situation of rupture of the social order was configured, in which political actors had to face the need to reconstruct new balances— achieved establishing path dependence, where previous decisions reinforce subsequent decisions in that same direction. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).