Tillage practices and liming: comparative study of soil properties and forage corn production

Descripción del Articulo

Tillage conservation practices (CA), traditional agriculture (TA), and liming influence soil properties and crop yield. However, it is essential to demonstrate which tillage and liming practices improve soil properties and forage corn yield. This study compared soil properties and forage corn produc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ocaña Reyes, Jimmy Alcides, Gutierrez Tang, Marco Antonio, Paredes Espinosa, Richard, Riveros Lizana, Christian Alonso, Cárdenas Rengifo, Gloria Patricia, Bravo Morales, Nino Frank, Quispe Tomas, Astrid Chilsy, Amaringo Cordova, Luiz Paulo, Ocaña Canales, Juan C., Zavala Solórzano, José W., Huamaní Yupanqui, Hugo A., Cruz Luis, Juancarlos Alejandro, Solórzano Acosta, Richard Andi
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria
Repositorio:INIA-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:null:20.500.12955/2465
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12955/2465
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030558
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Conservation and traditional agriculture
Coil CO2 emission
Lime and dolomite
Leaf area index
Cationic relationships
Forage corn yield
Corn
Maíz
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.01.06
Conservation agriculture
Agricultura de conservación
Índice de superficie foliar
Forage yield
Rendimiento del forraje
Descripción
Sumario:Tillage conservation practices (CA), traditional agriculture (TA), and liming influence soil properties and crop yield. However, it is essential to demonstrate which tillage and liming practices improve soil properties and forage corn yield. This study compared soil properties and forage corn production in two tillage systems with the addition of dolomite and lime, which formed four treatments. The tillage in the first three days surpassed the TA soil CO2 emission, with 64.8% more CO2 than in the CA soil, and the TA hydraulic conductivity and bulk density were more suitable than those in the CA soil. The CA soil had 233 earthworms m−2 more than in TA. The TA green forage corn yielded 6.45 t ha−1 more than in CA, with a higher P, Ca, and Mg foliar content than in CA, but in the CA, the foliar N and K were higher than in TA. The liming increased soil cations (except K), highlighting the lime on dolomite with—52% Al and + 4.85 t ha−1 of forage corn compared to the control. Soil CO2 emission was far lower in CA than in TA, with a slightly lower forage yield, and other soil properties were improved, meaning lower land preparation costs and time savings than in TA. Lime improved acidic soil faster than dolomite, generating higher forage yields.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).