Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perú
Descripción del Articulo
The objective of the study was to evaluate the reaction of Theobroma cacao clones to the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri, at the Tulumayo Experimental Station, Tingo María. Eleven “S” clonal hybrids and 3 “C” farmer collection clones were studied. Conidia of M. roreri were inoculated...
Autores: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | objeto de conferencia |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
Institución: | Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria |
Repositorio: | INIA-Institucional |
Lenguaje: | inglés |
OAI Identifier: | oai:null:20.500.12955/2382 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12955/2382 https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-112-3-S1.1 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Theobroma cacao Cocoa Clones Artificial inoculation Moniliophthora roreri https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.01.07 Moniliophthora Inoculation Inoculación |
id |
INIA_23a705055e0d865f4c8002f1e0f565b7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:null:20.500.12955/2382 |
network_acronym_str |
INIA |
network_name_str |
INIA-Institucional |
repository_id_str |
4830 |
dc.title.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perú |
title |
Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perú |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perú Paredes Espinosa, Richard Theobroma cacao Cocoa Clones Artificial inoculation Moniliophthora roreri https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.01.07 Clones Moniliophthora Inoculation Inoculación |
title_short |
Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perú |
title_full |
Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perú |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perú |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perú |
title_sort |
Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perú |
author |
Paredes Espinosa, Richard |
author_facet |
Paredes Espinosa, Richard Rios, R. A. Egoávil, G. Chia Wong, J. A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rios, R. A. Egoávil, G. Chia Wong, J. A. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paredes Espinosa, Richard Rios, R. A. Egoávil, G. Chia Wong, J. A. |
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Theobroma cacao Cocoa Clones Artificial inoculation Moniliophthora roreri |
topic |
Theobroma cacao Cocoa Clones Artificial inoculation Moniliophthora roreri https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.01.07 Clones Moniliophthora Inoculation Inoculación |
dc.subject.ocde.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.01.07 |
dc.subject.agrovoc.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Clones Moniliophthora Inoculation Inoculación |
description |
The objective of the study was to evaluate the reaction of Theobroma cacao clones to the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri, at the Tulumayo Experimental Station, Tingo María. Eleven “S” clonal hybrids and 3 “C” farmer collection clones were studied. Conidia of M. roreri were inoculated into 65-day-old fruits, protected for 48 h in a humid chamber. Incidence, external severity (SE) according to fruit damage in degrees were evaluated weekly, 0: healthy fruit, 1: hydrosis, 2: swelling, 3: necrosis, 4: mycelium that covers ¼ part of the stain and 5: mycelium that covers more than ¼ part of the stain, and internal severity (SI): percentage of necrotic grain in each fruit, the clones being compared by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). The results show a high incidence in all the clones, with values of 91.67 to 100%. Clone S-19 showed the lowest SE, which was 2.64, while clones S-01, S-08, S-09, S-11, S-13, S-15, S-22; S-24, S-26, S-28, C-02, C-03, and C-29 reported values between 3.64 and 5. The SI, fluctuated from 4.18 to 5 in all the clones evaluated. It is concluded that the clones are classified as susceptible to M. roreri, however, despite the fact that clone S-19 succumbed to the disease, it was able to delay the disease and the production of spores, an important character in the field that allows increasing the interval of fruit removal and fungicide applications, reducing production costs, negative environmental effects and improving work efficiency. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-21T15:46:08Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-21T15:46:08Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-25 |
dc.type.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
dc.identifier.citation.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Paredes, R.; Rios, R. A.; Egoávil, G.; & Chia Wong, J. A. (2022). Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perú. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 112(3), S1.11. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-112-3-S1.1 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1943-7684 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12955/2382 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-112-3-S1.1 |
identifier_str_mv |
Paredes, R.; Rios, R. A.; Egoávil, G.; & Chia Wong, J. A. (2022). Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perú. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 112(3), S1.11. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-112-3-S1.1 1943-7684 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12955/2382 https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-112-3-S1.1 |
dc.language.iso.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
urn:issn:1943-7684 |
dc.relation.ispartofseries.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
2021 APS Caribbean Division Meeting |
dc.rights.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.uri.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.format.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
The American Phytopathological Society |
dc.publisher.country.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
US |
dc.source.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:INIA-Institucional instname:Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria instacron:INIA |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria |
instacron_str |
INIA |
institution |
INIA |
reponame_str |
INIA-Institucional |
collection |
INIA-Institucional |
dc.source.uri.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional - INIA |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inia.gob.pe/bitstreams/7eefd286-12ac-4c63-9914-e7ea87ba2260/download https://repositorio.inia.gob.pe/bitstreams/93715589-ce4b-4c3b-8ec2-5aa74c473729/download https://repositorio.inia.gob.pe/bitstreams/cc5d7553-745f-4fca-9a41-de4d7b5e348f/download https://repositorio.inia.gob.pe/bitstreams/12c70777-009d-4df8-85ae-f6cefbcfe8c2/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bb5ca11537d20126907c91af1a5c9f97 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 99c7fb025c6530102a9bb9ae9b0aad13 d9e3d49752682f9da3b074f4f1053aa2 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional INIA |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@inia.gob.pe |
_version_ |
1833331741848240128 |
spelling |
Paredes Espinosa, RichardRios, R. A.Egoávil, G.Chia Wong, J. A.2023-11-21T15:46:08Z2023-11-21T15:46:08Z2022-03-25Paredes, R.; Rios, R. A.; Egoávil, G.; & Chia Wong, J. A. (2022). Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perú. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 112(3), S1.11. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-112-3-S1.11943-7684https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12955/2382https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-112-3-S1.1The objective of the study was to evaluate the reaction of Theobroma cacao clones to the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri, at the Tulumayo Experimental Station, Tingo María. Eleven “S” clonal hybrids and 3 “C” farmer collection clones were studied. Conidia of M. roreri were inoculated into 65-day-old fruits, protected for 48 h in a humid chamber. Incidence, external severity (SE) according to fruit damage in degrees were evaluated weekly, 0: healthy fruit, 1: hydrosis, 2: swelling, 3: necrosis, 4: mycelium that covers ¼ part of the stain and 5: mycelium that covers more than ¼ part of the stain, and internal severity (SI): percentage of necrotic grain in each fruit, the clones being compared by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). The results show a high incidence in all the clones, with values of 91.67 to 100%. Clone S-19 showed the lowest SE, which was 2.64, while clones S-01, S-08, S-09, S-11, S-13, S-15, S-22; S-24, S-26, S-28, C-02, C-03, and C-29 reported values between 3.64 and 5. The SI, fluctuated from 4.18 to 5 in all the clones evaluated. It is concluded that the clones are classified as susceptible to M. roreri, however, despite the fact that clone S-19 succumbed to the disease, it was able to delay the disease and the production of spores, an important character in the field that allows increasing the interval of fruit removal and fungicide applications, reducing production costs, negative environmental effects and improving work efficiency.application/pdfengThe American Phytopathological SocietyUSurn:issn:1943-76842021 APS Caribbean Division Meetinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Instituto Nacional de Innovación AgrariaRepositorio Institucional - INIAreponame:INIA-Institucionalinstname:Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agrariainstacron:INIATheobroma cacaoCocoaClonesArtificial inoculationMoniliophthora rorerihttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.01.07ClonesMoniliophthoraInoculationInoculaciónEvaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) clones at the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora roreri in Tingo María, Perúinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectORIGINALParedes_et-al_2022_cocoa_clones.pdfParedes_et-al_2022_cocoa_clones.pdfapplication/pdf433305https://repositorio.inia.gob.pe/bitstreams/7eefd286-12ac-4c63-9914-e7ea87ba2260/downloadbb5ca11537d20126907c91af1a5c9f97MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.inia.gob.pe/bitstreams/93715589-ce4b-4c3b-8ec2-5aa74c473729/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52TEXTParedes_et-al_2022_cocoa_clones.pdf.txtParedes_et-al_2022_cocoa_clones.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain10589https://repositorio.inia.gob.pe/bitstreams/cc5d7553-745f-4fca-9a41-de4d7b5e348f/download99c7fb025c6530102a9bb9ae9b0aad13MD53THUMBNAILParedes_et-al_2022_cocoa_clones.pdf.jpgParedes_et-al_2022_cocoa_clones.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1709https://repositorio.inia.gob.pe/bitstreams/12c70777-009d-4df8-85ae-f6cefbcfe8c2/downloadd9e3d49752682f9da3b074f4f1053aa2MD5420.500.12955/2382oai:repositorio.inia.gob.pe:20.500.12955/23822023-11-21 10:46:10.857https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessopen.accesshttps://repositorio.inia.gob.peRepositorio Institucional INIArepositorio@inia.gob.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 |
score |
13.949927 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).