Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study
Descripción del Articulo
Background: First-line therapy for advanced oesophageal cancer is currently limited to fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer a...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
| Institución: | Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas |
| Repositorio: | INEN-Institucional |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.inen.sld.pe:20.500.14703/153 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14703/153 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Pembrolizumab Gastric cancer HER2-negative https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21 |
| id |
INEN_0c0f032c12d6b6000db8d52986f22c2d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.inen.sld.pe:20.500.14703/153 |
| network_acronym_str |
INEN |
| network_name_str |
INEN-Institucional |
| repository_id_str |
. |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study |
| title |
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study |
| spellingShingle |
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study Sun, JM Pembrolizumab Gastric cancer HER2-negative https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21 |
| title_short |
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study |
| title_full |
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study |
| title_fullStr |
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study |
| title_sort |
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study |
| author |
Sun, JM |
| author_facet |
Sun, JM Shen, L Shah, MA Enzinger, P Adenis, A Doi, T Kojima, T Metges, JP Li, Z Kim, SB Cho, BC Mansoor, W Li, SH Sunpaweravong, P Maqueda, MA Goekkurt, E Hara, H Antunes, L Fountzilas, C Tsuji, A Castro-Oliden, V Liu Q Shah S Bhagia P Kato K KEYNOTE-590 Investigators. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Shen, L Shah, MA Enzinger, P Adenis, A Doi, T Kojima, T Metges, JP Li, Z Kim, SB Cho, BC Mansoor, W Li, SH Sunpaweravong, P Maqueda, MA Goekkurt, E Hara, H Antunes, L Fountzilas, C Tsuji, A Castro-Oliden, V Liu Q Shah S Bhagia P Kato K KEYNOTE-590 Investigators. |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sun, JM Shen, L Shah, MA Enzinger, P Adenis, A Doi, T Kojima, T Metges, JP Li, Z Kim, SB Cho, BC Mansoor, W Li, SH Sunpaweravong, P Maqueda, MA Goekkurt, E Hara, H Antunes, L Fountzilas, C Tsuji, A Castro-Oliden, V Liu Q Shah S Bhagia P Kato K KEYNOTE-590 Investigators. |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Pembrolizumab Gastric cancer HER2-negative |
| topic |
Pembrolizumab Gastric cancer HER2-negative https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21 |
| dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21 |
| description |
Background: First-line therapy for advanced oesophageal cancer is currently limited to fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer and Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. Methods: We did a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study across 168 medical centres in 26 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer or Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 status), measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (chemotherapy), once every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region, histology, and performance status. Patients, investigators, and site staff were masked to group assignment and PD-L1 biomarker status. Primary endpoints were overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189719, and is closed to recruitment. Findings: Between July 25, 2017, and June 3, 2019, 1020 patients were screened and 749 were enrolled and randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n=373 [50%]) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n=376 [50%]). At the first interim analysis (median follow-up of 22·6 months), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (median 13·9 months vs 8·8 months; hazard ratio 0·57 [95% CI 0·43-0·75]; p<0·0001), oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (12·6 months vs 9·8 months; 0·72 [0·60-0·88]; p=0·0006), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (13·5 months vs 9·4 months; 0·62 [0·49-0·78]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (12·4 months vs 9·8 months; 0·73 [0·62-0·86]; p<0·0001). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·54-0·78]; p<0·0001), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (7·5 months vs 5·5 months; 0·51 [0·41-0·65]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·55-0·76]; p<0·0001). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 266 (72%) patients in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 250 (68%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Interpretation: Compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved overall survival in patients with previously untreated, advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients regardless of histology, and had a manageable safety profile in the total as-treated population. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-08-29T16:05:26Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-08-29T16:05:26Z |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14703/153 |
| dc.identifier.journal.none.fl_str_mv |
Lancet |
| url |
https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14703/153 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Lancet |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier BV |
| dc.publisher.country.none.fl_str_mv |
GB |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier BV |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:INEN-Institucional instname:Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas instacron:INEN |
| instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas |
| instacron_str |
INEN |
| institution |
INEN |
| reponame_str |
INEN-Institucional |
| collection |
INEN-Institucional |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/94fc62a1-7119-4755-bae9-e4e8bc062a86/download https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/dd4ac90c-2549-4ee0-9b99-4029ffa99ed0/download https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/1e07c792-ae45-4de0-afef-55c96bdf0dce/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
cf687fa5152ef4da4626a73e2c62b207 cb0d318bdac1e702ab37085b7e42d823 4a524bde2823e94cd5b52dfec315baf3 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio del Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@inen.sld.pe |
| _version_ |
1864633497141903360 |
| spelling |
PublicationSun, JMShen, LShah, MAEnzinger, PAdenis, ADoi, TKojima, TMetges, JPLi, ZKim, SBCho, BCMansoor, WLi, SHSunpaweravong, PMaqueda, MAGoekkurt, EHara, HAntunes, LFountzilas, CTsuji, ACastro-Oliden, VLiu QShah SBhagia PKato KKEYNOTE-590 Investigators.2024-08-29T16:05:26Z2024-08-29T16:05:26Z2021https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14703/153LancetBackground: First-line therapy for advanced oesophageal cancer is currently limited to fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer and Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. Methods: We did a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study across 168 medical centres in 26 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer or Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 status), measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (chemotherapy), once every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region, histology, and performance status. Patients, investigators, and site staff were masked to group assignment and PD-L1 biomarker status. Primary endpoints were overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189719, and is closed to recruitment. Findings: Between July 25, 2017, and June 3, 2019, 1020 patients were screened and 749 were enrolled and randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n=373 [50%]) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n=376 [50%]). At the first interim analysis (median follow-up of 22·6 months), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (median 13·9 months vs 8·8 months; hazard ratio 0·57 [95% CI 0·43-0·75]; p<0·0001), oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (12·6 months vs 9·8 months; 0·72 [0·60-0·88]; p=0·0006), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (13·5 months vs 9·4 months; 0·62 [0·49-0·78]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (12·4 months vs 9·8 months; 0·73 [0·62-0·86]; p<0·0001). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·54-0·78]; p<0·0001), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (7·5 months vs 5·5 months; 0·51 [0·41-0·65]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·55-0·76]; p<0·0001). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 266 (72%) patients in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 250 (68%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Interpretation: Compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved overall survival in patients with previously untreated, advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients regardless of histology, and had a manageable safety profile in the total as-treated population.application/pdfengElsevier BVGBinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/PembrolizumabGastric cancerHER2-negativehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionreponame:INEN-Institucionalinstname:Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicasinstacron:INENORIGINALSun 2021.pdfapplication/pdf92358https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/94fc62a1-7119-4755-bae9-e4e8bc062a86/downloadcf687fa5152ef4da4626a73e2c62b207MD51trueAnonymousREADTEXTSun 2021.pdf.txtWritten by FormatFilter org.dspace.app.mediafilter.TikaTextExtractionFilter on 2025-03-29T20:38:14Z (GMT).Extracted texttext/plain24248https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/dd4ac90c-2549-4ee0-9b99-4029ffa99ed0/downloadcb0d318bdac1e702ab37085b7e42d823MD54falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILSun 2021.pdf.jpgWritten by FormatFilter org.dspace.app.mediafilter.PDFBoxThumbnail on 2025-03-29T20:38:14Z (GMT).Generated Thumbnailimage/jpeg35549https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/1e07c792-ae45-4de0-afef-55c96bdf0dce/download4a524bde2823e94cd5b52dfec315baf3MD55falseAnonymousREAD20.500.14703/153oai:repositorio.inen.sld.pe:20.500.14703/1532026-02-15T20:57:58.514Zhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessopen.accesshttps://repositorio.inen.sld.peRepositorio del Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicasrepositorio@inen.sld.pe |
| score |
13.468099 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).