Guidance for assessment of the inflammation etiologic criterion for the GLIM diagnosis of malnutrition: A modified Delphi approach

• Autores: Cederholm, Tommy, Jensen, Gordon L., Ballesteros-Pomar, Maria D., Blaauw, Renee, Correia, M. Isabel T.D., Cuerda, Cristina, Evans, David C., Fukushima, Ryoji, Ochoa Gautier, Juan Bernardo, Gonzalez, M. Cristina, Van Gossum, Andre, Gramlich, Leah, Hartono, Joseph, Heymsfield, Steven B., Jager-Wittenaar, Harriët, Jayatissa, Renuka, Keller, Heather, Malone, Ainsley, Manzanares, William, McMahon, M. Molly, Mendez, Yolanda, Mogensen, Kris M., Mori, Naoharu, Muscaritoli, Maurizio, Nogales, Guillermo Contreras, Nyulasi, Ibolya, Phillips, Wendy, Pirlich, Matthias, Pisprasert, Veeradej, Rothenberg, Elisabet, de van der Schueren, Marian, Shi, Han Ping, Steiber, Alison, Winkler, Marion F., Barazzoni, Rocco, Compher, Charlene
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2024
• Institución: Seguro Social de Salud
• Repositorio: ESSALUD-Institucional
• Lenguaje: inglés
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.essalud.gob.pe:20.500.12959/5156
• Enlace del recurso: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12959/5156; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2023.11.026
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Malnutrition; Inflammation; Assessment; C-reactive protein; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.04

Background & aims: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) approach to malnutrition diagnosis is based on assessment of three phenotypic (weight loss, low body mass index, and reduced skeletal muscle mass) and two etiologic (reduced food intake/assimilation and disease burden/inflammation) criteria, with diagnosis confirmed by fulfillment of any combination of at least one phenotypic and at least one etiologic criterion. The original GLIM description provided limited guidance regarding assessment of inflammation and this has been a factor impeding further implementation of the GLIM criteria. We now seek to provide practical guidance for assessment of inflammation in support of the etiologic criterion for inflammation. Methods: A GLIM-constituted working group with 36 participants developed consensus-based guidance through a modified-Delphi review. A multi-round review and revision process served to develop seven guidance statements. Results: The final round of review was highly favorable with 99 % overall “agree” or “strongly agree” responses. The presence of acute or chronic disease, infection or injury that is usually associated with inflammatory activity may be used to fulfill the GLIM disease burden/inflammation criterion, without the need for laboratory confirmation. However, we recommend that recognition of underlying medical conditions commonly associated with inflammation be supported by C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements when the contribution of inflammatory components is uncertain. Interpretation of CRP requires that consideration be given to the method, reference values, and units (mg/dL or mg/L) for the clinical laboratory that is being used. Conclusion: Confirmation of inflammation should be guided by clinical judgement based upon underlying diagnosis or condition, clinical signs, or CRP.