Margen de apreciación nacional, diálogo judicial y argumentación racional: notas desde la experiencia peruana

• Autor: Grández Castro, Pedro P.
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2021
• Institución: Universidad ESAN
• Repositorio: ESAN-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.esan.edu.pe:20.500.12640/2819
• Enlace del recurso: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12640/2819; https://doi.org/10.46631/Giuristi.2021.v2n4.08
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Margin of national appreciation; Inter-American human rights system; Judicial dialogue; Conventional reasoning; Margen de apreciación nacional; Sistema interamericano de derechos humanos; Diálogo judicial; Argumentación convencional; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01

The paper analyzes the presence of the national margin of appreciation doctrine (NMA) in the reasoning developed in the inter-American human rights system, from a perspective of articulation between the Inter-American Court jurisdiction and States internal jurisdictions. The argument that is defended in the paper maintains that, in the framework of an open process of implementation of a globalized model of constitutionalism, a certain level of NMA is not only necessary for the inter-American judicial dialogue, but also even indispensable. In order to achieve this objective, the work has three parts: the first presents a brief summary of the NMA doctrine and its justification; the second presents the debate developed in this regard in the inter-American system; and the last one shows an example of a rational interaction model based on the Peruvian case of conventional control of the amnesty received by President Alberto Fujimori.