Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China

Descripción del Articulo

Purpose: Written communication differences across cultures can set the tone for effective or disastrous business relationships. Although English has been the go-to language in business, managers from different countries can significantly differ in how they convey the firms' information. This st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Irizarry Quintero, Anamari, Rodríguez Ramirez, Javier, Villafane-Rodríguez, Camille
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Universidad ESAN
Repositorio:ESAN-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.esan.edu.pe:20.500.12640/3557
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12640/3557
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2021-0123
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:American depositary receipts (ADRs)
Initial public offerings (IPOs)
Intercultural communication
Cultural awareness
Recibos de depósito americanos (RDA)
Ofertas públicas iniciales (IPO)
Comunicación intercultural
Conciencia cultural
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.04
id ESAN_21d9867b3f32ca20952b05184bd586ef
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.esan.edu.pe:20.500.12640/3557
network_acronym_str ESAN
network_name_str ESAN-Institucional
repository_id_str 4835
dc.title.en_EN.fl_str_mv Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China
title Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China
spellingShingle Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China
Irizarry Quintero, Anamari
American depositary receipts (ADRs)
Initial public offerings (IPOs)
Intercultural communication
Cultural awareness
Recibos de depósito americanos (RDA)
Ofertas públicas iniciales (IPO)
Comunicación intercultural
Conciencia cultural
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.04
title_short Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China
title_full Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China
title_fullStr Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China
title_full_unstemmed Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China
title_sort Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China
author Irizarry Quintero, Anamari
author_facet Irizarry Quintero, Anamari
Rodríguez Ramirez, Javier
Villafane-Rodríguez, Camille
author_role author
author2 Rodríguez Ramirez, Javier
Villafane-Rodríguez, Camille
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Irizarry Quintero, Anamari
Rodríguez Ramirez, Javier
Villafane-Rodríguez, Camille
dc.subject.en_EN.fl_str_mv American depositary receipts (ADRs)
Initial public offerings (IPOs)
Intercultural communication
Cultural awareness
topic American depositary receipts (ADRs)
Initial public offerings (IPOs)
Intercultural communication
Cultural awareness
Recibos de depósito americanos (RDA)
Ofertas públicas iniciales (IPO)
Comunicación intercultural
Conciencia cultural
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.04
dc.subject.es_ES.fl_str_mv Recibos de depósito americanos (RDA)
Ofertas públicas iniciales (IPO)
Comunicación intercultural
Conciencia cultural
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.04
description Purpose: Written communication differences across cultures can set the tone for effective or disastrous business relationships. Although English has been the go-to language in business, managers from different countries can significantly differ in how they convey the firms' information. This study explored these differences by examining the documentation presented by foreign corporations as part of their initial public offering (IPO) in the USA, particularly Chinese firms. Design/methodology/approach: This work examined cultural-related differences in written communications by looking at foreign corporations' descriptions of their strengths, strategies and challenges included in F-1 documents submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as part of the IPO process. The sample consisted of 97 American depositary receipts (ADRs) identified in the Bank of New York Mellon's ADR directory from 2003 to 2015. Findings: This study found that Chinese firms significantly differ from other countries' firms in depicting their strengths, strategies and challenges. Research limitations/implications: Limitations have to do with the sample size. Future research may address this by considering other depositary markets, not just the USA. Originality/value: The results will be significant for potential ADRs investors; they must be conscious of these differences in the written documentation submitted by Chinese firms compared to other foreign firms. The market should also be aware of these differences, as the Chinese seem less open to sharing information about the under spinning of their operations and financial prospects.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-16T03:05:33Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-16T03:05:33Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2023-06-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.other.none.fl_str_mv Artículo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.none.fl_str_mv Irizarry Quintero, A., Rodríguez Ramirez, J., & Villafane-Rodríguez, C. (2023). Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 28(55), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2021-0123
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12640/3557
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2021-0123
identifier_str_mv Irizarry Quintero, A., Rodríguez Ramirez, J., & Villafane-Rodríguez, C. (2023). Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 28(55), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2021-0123
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12640/3557
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2021-0123
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv urn:issn:2218-0648
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/667/543
dc.rights.en.fl_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.es_ES.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.es_ES.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad ESAN. ESAN Ediciones
dc.publisher.country.none.fl_str_mv PE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad ESAN. ESAN Ediciones
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:ESAN-Institucional
instname:Universidad ESAN
instacron:ESAN
instname_str Universidad ESAN
instacron_str ESAN
institution ESAN
reponame_str ESAN-Institucional
collection ESAN-Institucional
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/14b8cfef-f073-4a28-91fb-7d9fe134d57b/download
https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/4db04417-d760-4c4a-9f6e-3a3c2a98a229/download
https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/3498903c-f85c-4312-851b-4410ad5e1db5/download
https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/8a4791d9-932b-421b-8cf7-d03499f870bc/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 5b16556e214f0481f76b728107a12a80
4c318402045116623f864c96fdea8bc9
fd6bd853770fc09cb17e33a1a4f0c8ad
af90fb5a644803f44c4bfebbc20b8ac7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional ESAN
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@esan.edu.pe
_version_ 1843261933494468608
spelling Irizarry Quintero, AnamariRodríguez Ramirez, JavierVillafane-Rodríguez, Camille2023-08-16T03:05:33Z2023-08-16T03:05:33Z2023-06-30Irizarry Quintero, A., Rodríguez Ramirez, J., & Villafane-Rodríguez, C. (2023). Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 28(55), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2021-0123https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12640/3557https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2021-0123Purpose: Written communication differences across cultures can set the tone for effective or disastrous business relationships. Although English has been the go-to language in business, managers from different countries can significantly differ in how they convey the firms' information. This study explored these differences by examining the documentation presented by foreign corporations as part of their initial public offering (IPO) in the USA, particularly Chinese firms. Design/methodology/approach: This work examined cultural-related differences in written communications by looking at foreign corporations' descriptions of their strengths, strategies and challenges included in F-1 documents submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as part of the IPO process. The sample consisted of 97 American depositary receipts (ADRs) identified in the Bank of New York Mellon's ADR directory from 2003 to 2015. Findings: This study found that Chinese firms significantly differ from other countries' firms in depicting their strengths, strategies and challenges. Research limitations/implications: Limitations have to do with the sample size. Future research may address this by considering other depositary markets, not just the USA. Originality/value: The results will be significant for potential ADRs investors; they must be conscious of these differences in the written documentation submitted by Chinese firms compared to other foreign firms. The market should also be aware of these differences, as the Chinese seem less open to sharing information about the under spinning of their operations and financial prospects.Objetivo: Las diferencias en la comunicación escrita entre culturas pueden marcar la pauta para relaciones comerciales efectivas o desastrosas. Aunque el inglés ha sido el idioma de referencia en los negocios, los gerentes de diferentes países pueden diferir significativamente en la forma en que transmiten la información de las empresas. Este estudio exploró estas diferencias examinando la documentación presentada por corporaciones extranjeras como parte de su oferta pública inicial (IPO) en los EE. UU., particularmente las empresas chinas. Diseño/metodología/enfoque: Este trabajo examinó las diferencias culturales en las comunicaciones escritas analizando las descripciones de las corporaciones extranjeras de sus fortalezas, estrategias y desafíos incluidos en los documentos F-1 presentados a la Comisión de Bolsa y Valores (SEC) como parte del Proceso de salida a bolsa. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 97 recibos de depósito estadounidenses (ADR) identificados en el directorio de ADR del Bank of New York Mellon de 2003 a 2015. Hallazgos: Este estudio encontró que las empresas chinas difieren significativamente de las empresas de otros países al describir sus fortalezas, estrategias y desafíos. Limitaciones/implicaciones de la investigación: Las limitaciones tienen que ver con el tamaño de la muestra. Las investigaciones futuras podrían abordar este problema considerando otros mercados de depositarios, no sólo Estados Unidos. Originalidad/valor: Los resultados serán significativos para los potenciales inversores en ADR; deben ser conscientes de estas diferencias en la documentación escrita presentada por las empresas chinas en comparación con otras empresas extranjeras. El mercado también debería ser consciente de estas diferencias, ya que los chinos parecen menos abiertos a compartir información sobre los fundamentos de sus operaciones y perspectivas financieras.application/pdfInglésengUniversidad ESAN. ESAN EdicionesPEurn:issn:2218-0648https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/667/543Attribution 4.0 Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/American depositary receipts (ADRs)Initial public offerings (IPOs)Intercultural communicationCultural awarenessRecibos de depósito americanos (RDA)Ofertas públicas iniciales (IPO)Comunicación interculturalConciencia culturalhttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.04Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of Chinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículoreponame:ESAN-Institucionalinstname:Universidad ESANinstacron:ESAN2105519728Acceso abiertoTHUMBNAIL55.jpg55.jpgimage/jpeg35081https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/14b8cfef-f073-4a28-91fb-7d9fe134d57b/download5b16556e214f0481f76b728107a12a80MD51falseAnonymousREADJEFAS-55-2023-197-210.pdf.jpgJEFAS-55-2023-197-210.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg6264https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/4db04417-d760-4c4a-9f6e-3a3c2a98a229/download4c318402045116623f864c96fdea8bc9MD54falseAnonymousREADORIGINALJEFAS-55-2023-197-210.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf155320https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/3498903c-f85c-4312-851b-4410ad5e1db5/downloadfd6bd853770fc09cb17e33a1a4f0c8adMD52trueAnonymousREADTEXTJEFAS-55-2023-197-210.pdf.txtJEFAS-55-2023-197-210.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain50210https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/8a4791d9-932b-421b-8cf7-d03499f870bc/downloadaf90fb5a644803f44c4bfebbc20b8ac7MD53falseAnonymousREAD20.500.12640/3557oai:repositorio.esan.edu.pe:20.500.12640/35572025-07-09 09:29:56.648https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Attribution 4.0 Internationalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.esan.edu.peRepositorio Institucional ESANrepositorio@esan.edu.pe
score 13.919782
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).