Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?

Descripción del Articulo

The Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (Cusco, Peru) is one of the most important archaeological monuments in Peru and worldwide. Machu Picchu is classified as a UNESCO World Heritage site and at risk from climatic change. However, the seismic centennial history of Peru reports large earthquakes gen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Rodríguez-Pascua M.A., Benavente Escobar C., Rosell Guevara L., Grützner C., Audin L., Walker R., García B., Aguirre E.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
Repositorio:CONCYTEC-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2521
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2521
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09877-4
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Machu Picchu
Ancient earthquakes
Creep slope movement
Earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs)
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.07.01
id CONC_f6b917a531474dd6773ab4627a195c58
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2521
network_acronym_str CONC
network_name_str CONCYTEC-Institucional
repository_id_str 4689
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?
title Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?
spellingShingle Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?
Rodríguez-Pascua M.A.
Machu Picchu
Ancient earthquakes
Creep slope movement
Earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs)
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.07.01
title_short Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?
title_full Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?
title_fullStr Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?
title_full_unstemmed Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?
title_sort Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?
author Rodríguez-Pascua M.A.
author_facet Rodríguez-Pascua M.A.
Benavente Escobar C.
Rosell Guevara L.
Grützner C.
Audin L.
Walker R.
García B.
Aguirre E.
author_role author
author2 Benavente Escobar C.
Rosell Guevara L.
Grützner C.
Audin L.
Walker R.
García B.
Aguirre E.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodríguez-Pascua M.A.
Benavente Escobar C.
Rosell Guevara L.
Grützner C.
Audin L.
Walker R.
García B.
Aguirre E.
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Machu Picchu
topic Machu Picchu
Ancient earthquakes
Creep slope movement
Earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs)
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.07.01
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv Ancient earthquakes
Creep slope movement
Earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs)
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.07.01
description The Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (Cusco, Peru) is one of the most important archaeological monuments in Peru and worldwide. Machu Picchu is classified as a UNESCO World Heritage site and at risk from climatic change. However, the seismic centennial history of Peru reports large earthquakes generated both along the subduction zone (Mw8) and on active crustal faults along the Andean Cordillera (Mw7). It is therefore important to know if Machu Picchu is located in an area of seismic hazard and then to take measures to mitigate potential seismic hazards. Due to the short historical earthquake catalogue (< 500 years) and the absence of significant recent instrumental seismicity in the site’s vicinity (radius of < 30 km), our knowledge about the seismic hazard in Machu Picchu is limited. The earthquakes of 1650 and 1950 affected Cusco city and surrounding areas, but without damage descriptions in Machu Picchu (80 km away) (Silgado Ferro 1978). In this study, we make the first attempt to use the analysis of earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs) and their differentiation from the effects generated by slope movements (creep) to investigate the past occurrence of strong earthquakes at the site. The application of geological structural analysis to the deformations observed in Machu Picchu shows two directions of the mean ground movement: N020° E and N110° E. Two earthquakes that affected Machu Picchu during its construction generated these directions. This kind of data should be used in the future to protect this important archaeological site. © 2019, Springer Nature B.V.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T23:13:38Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T23:13:38Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2521
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09877-4
dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv 2-s2.0-85074789220
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2521
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09877-4
identifier_str_mv 2-s2.0-85074789220
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Seismology
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional
instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
instacron:CONCYTEC
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
instacron_str CONCYTEC
institution CONCYTEC
reponame_str CONCYTEC-Institucional
collection CONCYTEC-Institucional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@concytec.gob.pe
_version_ 1844883053272367104
spelling Publicationrp06479600rp06476600rp06477600rp06475600rp05813600rp06478600rp05820600rp05818600Rodríguez-Pascua M.A.Benavente Escobar C.Rosell Guevara L.Grützner C.Audin L.Walker R.García B.Aguirre E.2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2020https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2521https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09877-42-s2.0-85074789220The Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (Cusco, Peru) is one of the most important archaeological monuments in Peru and worldwide. Machu Picchu is classified as a UNESCO World Heritage site and at risk from climatic change. However, the seismic centennial history of Peru reports large earthquakes generated both along the subduction zone (Mw8) and on active crustal faults along the Andean Cordillera (Mw7). It is therefore important to know if Machu Picchu is located in an area of seismic hazard and then to take measures to mitigate potential seismic hazards. Due to the short historical earthquake catalogue (< 500 years) and the absence of significant recent instrumental seismicity in the site’s vicinity (radius of < 30 km), our knowledge about the seismic hazard in Machu Picchu is limited. The earthquakes of 1650 and 1950 affected Cusco city and surrounding areas, but without damage descriptions in Machu Picchu (80 km away) (Silgado Ferro 1978). In this study, we make the first attempt to use the analysis of earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs) and their differentiation from the effects generated by slope movements (creep) to investigate the past occurrence of strong earthquakes at the site. The application of geological structural analysis to the deformations observed in Machu Picchu shows two directions of the mean ground movement: N020° E and N110° E. Two earthquakes that affected Machu Picchu during its construction generated these directions. This kind of data should be used in the future to protect this important archaeological site. © 2019, Springer Nature B.V.Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica - ConcytecengSpringerJournal of Seismologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMachu PicchuAncient earthquakes-1Creep slope movement-1Earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs)-1http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.07.01-1Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?info:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC20.500.12390/2521oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/25212024-05-30 16:09:00.419http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="08104b66-d0ac-4b21-ba9e-c5c960ce6b7a"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>Journal of Seismology</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2020</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09877-4</DOI> <SCP-Number>2-s2.0-85074789220</SCP-Number> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Rodríguez-Pascua M.A.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp06479" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Benavente Escobar C.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp06476" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Rosell Guevara L.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp06477" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Grützner C.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp06475" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Audin L.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp05813" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Walker R.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp06478" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>García B.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp05820" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Aguirre E.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp05818" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Springer</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <Keyword>Machu Picchu</Keyword> <Keyword>Ancient earthquakes</Keyword> <Keyword>Creep slope movement</Keyword> <Keyword>Earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs)</Keyword> <Abstract>The Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (Cusco, Peru) is one of the most important archaeological monuments in Peru and worldwide. Machu Picchu is classified as a UNESCO World Heritage site and at risk from climatic change. However, the seismic centennial history of Peru reports large earthquakes generated both along the subduction zone (Mw8) and on active crustal faults along the Andean Cordillera (Mw7). It is therefore important to know if Machu Picchu is located in an area of seismic hazard and then to take measures to mitigate potential seismic hazards. Due to the short historical earthquake catalogue (&lt; 500 years) and the absence of significant recent instrumental seismicity in the site’s vicinity (radius of &lt; 30 km), our knowledge about the seismic hazard in Machu Picchu is limited. The earthquakes of 1650 and 1950 affected Cusco city and surrounding areas, but without damage descriptions in Machu Picchu (80 km away) (Silgado Ferro 1978). In this study, we make the first attempt to use the analysis of earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs) and their differentiation from the effects generated by slope movements (creep) to investigate the past occurrence of strong earthquakes at the site. The application of geological structural analysis to the deformations observed in Machu Picchu shows two directions of the mean ground movement: N020° E and N110° E. Two earthquakes that affected Machu Picchu during its construction generated these directions. This kind of data should be used in the future to protect this important archaeological site. © 2019, Springer Nature B.V.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1
score 13.457447
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).