Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation

Descripción del Articulo

The backscatter coefficient (BSC) is a fundamental property of tissues and can be used to classify tissues. Two BSC calibration methods are the planar reflector method and the reference phantom method. In both methods, linear acoustic propagation is assumed. In this study, the calibration methods we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Coila, Andres, Oelze, Michael L.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
Repositorio:CONCYTEC-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2836
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2836
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5115355
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Acoustics and Ultrasonics
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02
id CONC_d1c723965f8110a5b474be8e91ffb750
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2836
network_acronym_str CONC
network_name_str CONCYTEC-Institucional
repository_id_str 4689
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation
title Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation
spellingShingle Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation
Coila, Andres
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Acoustics and Ultrasonics
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02
title_short Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation
title_full Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation
title_fullStr Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation
title_full_unstemmed Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation
title_sort Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation
author Coila, Andres
author_facet Coila, Andres
Oelze, Michael L.
author_role author
author2 Oelze, Michael L.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coila, Andres
Oelze, Michael L.
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
topic Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Acoustics and Ultrasonics
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv Acoustics and Ultrasonics
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02
description The backscatter coefficient (BSC) is a fundamental property of tissues and can be used to classify tissues. Two BSC calibration methods are the planar reflector method and the reference phantom method. In both methods, linear acoustic propagation is assumed. In this study, the calibration methods were evaluated when acoustic nonlinear distortion was present. Radio frequency data were acquired from two physical phantoms using a 5 MHz single-element transducer and low power (one excitation level) and high power (six increasing excitation levels) excitation signals. BSCs estimated from the high power settings were compared to the BSCs estimated using the low power by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE). The BSCs were parameterized by fitting the BSC curve to a power law and estimating the power law exponent and by estimating the effective scatterer diameter (ESD). When using the planar reflector method, estimates of the exponent were observed to monotonically increase in value versus increasing excitation level and the ESD decreased with increasing excitation level. The RMSE increased monotonically versus excitation level using the planar reflector method but did not increase using the reference phantom method. The results suggest that the effects of nonlinear distortion are minimized using the reference phantom method. (C) 2019 Acoustical Society of America.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T23:13:38Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T23:13:38Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2836
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5115355
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2836
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5115355
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional
instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
instacron:CONCYTEC
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
instacron_str CONCYTEC
institution CONCYTEC
reponame_str CONCYTEC-Institucional
collection CONCYTEC-Institucional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@concytec.gob.pe
_version_ 1839175553501888512
spelling Publicationrp07702600rp07701600Coila, AndresOelze, Michael L.2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2019https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2836https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5115355The backscatter coefficient (BSC) is a fundamental property of tissues and can be used to classify tissues. Two BSC calibration methods are the planar reflector method and the reference phantom method. In both methods, linear acoustic propagation is assumed. In this study, the calibration methods were evaluated when acoustic nonlinear distortion was present. Radio frequency data were acquired from two physical phantoms using a 5 MHz single-element transducer and low power (one excitation level) and high power (six increasing excitation levels) excitation signals. BSCs estimated from the high power settings were compared to the BSCs estimated using the low power by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE). The BSCs were parameterized by fitting the BSC curve to a power law and estimating the power law exponent and by estimating the effective scatterer diameter (ESD). When using the planar reflector method, estimates of the exponent were observed to monotonically increase in value versus increasing excitation level and the ESD decreased with increasing excitation level. The RMSE increased monotonically versus excitation level using the planar reflector method but did not increase using the reference phantom method. The results suggest that the effects of nonlinear distortion are minimized using the reference phantom method. (C) 2019 Acoustical Society of America.Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico - FondecytengAcoustical Society of America (ASA)JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)Acoustics and Ultrasonics-1http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02-1Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#20.500.12390/2836oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/28362024-05-30 15:25:42.362http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="5acc6dc4-6f42-4950-b60e-8787873ae78d"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2019</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5115355</DOI> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Coila, Andres</DisplayName> <Person id="rp07702" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Oelze, Michael L.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp07701" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Acoustical Society of America (ASA)</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <Keyword>Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)</Keyword> <Keyword>Acoustics and Ultrasonics</Keyword> <Abstract>The backscatter coefficient (BSC) is a fundamental property of tissues and can be used to classify tissues. Two BSC calibration methods are the planar reflector method and the reference phantom method. In both methods, linear acoustic propagation is assumed. In this study, the calibration methods were evaluated when acoustic nonlinear distortion was present. Radio frequency data were acquired from two physical phantoms using a 5 MHz single-element transducer and low power (one excitation level) and high power (six increasing excitation levels) excitation signals. BSCs estimated from the high power settings were compared to the BSCs estimated using the low power by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE). The BSCs were parameterized by fitting the BSC curve to a power law and estimating the power law exponent and by estimating the effective scatterer diameter (ESD). When using the planar reflector method, estimates of the exponent were observed to monotonically increase in value versus increasing excitation level and the ESD decreased with increasing excitation level. The RMSE increased monotonically versus excitation level using the planar reflector method but did not increase using the reference phantom method. The results suggest that the effects of nonlinear distortion are minimized using the reference phantom method. (C) 2019 Acoustical Society of America.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1
score 13.2747
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).