Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?

Descripción del Articulo

This research was funded by CONCYTEC through the project IMAGEN–Innovaciones en la mejora genética altoandina: alpacas y llamas (29-2019-FONDECYT-BM-INC.INV).
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Wurzinger M., Gutiérrez G.A., Sölkner J., Probst L.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
Repositorio:CONCYTEC-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2984
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2984
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.613505
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:small-holder agriculture
breeding program
community-based breeding
livestock breeding
multi-level perspective
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.02.01
id CONC_31514ece71078d61ad537a5cd127e39f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2984
network_acronym_str CONC
network_name_str CONCYTEC-Institucional
repository_id_str 4689
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?
title Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?
spellingShingle Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?
Wurzinger M.
small-holder agriculture
breeding program
community-based breeding
community-based breeding
livestock breeding
livestock breeding
multi-level perspective
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.02.01
title_short Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?
title_full Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?
title_fullStr Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?
title_full_unstemmed Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?
title_sort Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?
author Wurzinger M.
author_facet Wurzinger M.
Gutiérrez G.A.
Sölkner J.
Probst L.
author_role author
author2 Gutiérrez G.A.
Sölkner J.
Probst L.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wurzinger M.
Gutiérrez G.A.
Sölkner J.
Probst L.
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv small-holder agriculture
topic small-holder agriculture
breeding program
community-based breeding
community-based breeding
livestock breeding
livestock breeding
multi-level perspective
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.02.01
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv breeding program
community-based breeding
community-based breeding
livestock breeding
livestock breeding
multi-level perspective
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.02.01
description This research was funded by CONCYTEC through the project IMAGEN–Innovaciones en la mejora genética altoandina: alpacas y llamas (29-2019-FONDECYT-BM-INC.INV).
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T23:13:38Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T23:13:38Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2984
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.613505
dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv 2-s2.0-85107348675
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2984
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.613505
identifier_str_mv 2-s2.0-85107348675
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers in Veterinary Science
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media S.A.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media S.A.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional
instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
instacron:CONCYTEC
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
instacron_str CONCYTEC
institution CONCYTEC
reponame_str CONCYTEC-Institucional
collection CONCYTEC-Institucional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@concytec.gob.pe
_version_ 1839175535106719744
spelling Publicationrp08458600rp08456600rp08460600rp08461600Wurzinger M.Gutiérrez G.A.Sölkner J.Probst L.2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2021https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2984https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.6135052-s2.0-85107348675This research was funded by CONCYTEC through the project IMAGEN–Innovaciones en la mejora genética altoandina: alpacas y llamas (29-2019-FONDECYT-BM-INC.INV).Over the past decade, community-based breeding programs (CBBPs) have been promoted as a viable approach to improving smallholder livelihoods through a systematic livestock breeding. CBBPs aim to initiate systematic breeding at the community level, including an organized animal identification and recording of performance and pedigree data. To ensure the breeding programs' continuity, building capacities, and ownership among participants are essential to the approach. This study's purpose was to understand how CBBPs have evolved in specific institutional settings and which dynamics occur in the course of implementation. We addressed these questions in reflective conversations with six coordinators of a diverse sample of CBBPs: goats (Malawi, Uganda, and Mexico), sheep (Ethiopia), alpaca (Peru), and cattle (Burkina Faso). The interviews and analysis were guided by categories of the multi-level perspective. The respondents considered lack of funding and weak institutionalization as the main constraints on the CBBPs. While the idea of participation and localized ownership was at the center of the programs, linear paradigms of knowledge transfer prevailed. In all cases, the impulse to start a CBBP came from individual researchers, who relied on intermediaries, such as extension agents, for implementation. Personal relations and trust were seen as both a factor in the success and a positive outcome of CBBPs. We conclude that these findings have different implications depending on how rural development is conceptualized: proponents of the innovation systems perspective would call for stakeholders to further align their interests and coordinate their actions. Proponents of process-relational concepts, in contrast, would not consider the CBBP a product but a starting-point for initiators and participants to continuously discover new ways of collaboration and engagement. © Copyright © 2021 Wurzinger, Gutiérrez, Sölkner and Probst.Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica - ConcytecengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/small-holder agriculturebreeding program-1community-based breeding-1community-based breeding-1livestock breeding-1livestock breeding-1multi-level perspective-1https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.02.01-1Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?info:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC20.500.12390/2984oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/29842024-05-30 16:12:49.561https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="4e3a8325-d93b-4fac-99b0-d5f6d50cd724"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2021</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.613505</DOI> <SCP-Number>2-s2.0-85107348675</SCP-Number> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Wurzinger M.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp08458" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Gutiérrez G.A.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp08456" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Sölkner J.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp08460" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Probst L.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp08461" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Frontiers Media S.A.</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <License>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</License> <Keyword>small-holder agriculture</Keyword> <Keyword>breeding program</Keyword> <Keyword>community-based breeding</Keyword> <Keyword>community-based breeding</Keyword> <Keyword>livestock breeding</Keyword> <Keyword>livestock breeding</Keyword> <Keyword>multi-level perspective</Keyword> <Abstract>Over the past decade, community-based breeding programs (CBBPs) have been promoted as a viable approach to improving smallholder livelihoods through a systematic livestock breeding. CBBPs aim to initiate systematic breeding at the community level, including an organized animal identification and recording of performance and pedigree data. To ensure the breeding programs&apos; continuity, building capacities, and ownership among participants are essential to the approach. This study&apos;s purpose was to understand how CBBPs have evolved in specific institutional settings and which dynamics occur in the course of implementation. We addressed these questions in reflective conversations with six coordinators of a diverse sample of CBBPs: goats (Malawi, Uganda, and Mexico), sheep (Ethiopia), alpaca (Peru), and cattle (Burkina Faso). The interviews and analysis were guided by categories of the multi-level perspective. The respondents considered lack of funding and weak institutionalization as the main constraints on the CBBPs. While the idea of participation and localized ownership was at the center of the programs, linear paradigms of knowledge transfer prevailed. In all cases, the impulse to start a CBBP came from individual researchers, who relied on intermediaries, such as extension agents, for implementation. Personal relations and trust were seen as both a factor in the success and a positive outcome of CBBPs. We conclude that these findings have different implications depending on how rural development is conceptualized: proponents of the innovation systems perspective would call for stakeholders to further align their interests and coordinate their actions. Proponents of process-relational concepts, in contrast, would not consider the CBBP a product but a starting-point for initiators and participants to continuously discover new ways of collaboration and engagement. © Copyright © 2021 Wurzinger, Gutiérrez, Sölkner and Probst.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1
score 13.210282
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).