Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?
Descripción del Articulo
This research was funded by CONCYTEC through the project IMAGEN–Innovaciones en la mejora genética altoandina: alpacas y llamas (29-2019-FONDECYT-BM-INC.INV).
Autores: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
Repositorio: | CONCYTEC-Institucional |
Lenguaje: | inglés |
OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2984 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2984 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.613505 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | small-holder agriculture breeding program community-based breeding livestock breeding multi-level perspective https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.02.01 |
id |
CONC_31514ece71078d61ad537a5cd127e39f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2984 |
network_acronym_str |
CONC |
network_name_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
repository_id_str |
4689 |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process? |
title |
Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process? |
spellingShingle |
Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process? Wurzinger M. small-holder agriculture breeding program community-based breeding community-based breeding livestock breeding livestock breeding multi-level perspective https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.02.01 |
title_short |
Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process? |
title_full |
Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process? |
title_fullStr |
Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process? |
title_sort |
Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process? |
author |
Wurzinger M. |
author_facet |
Wurzinger M. Gutiérrez G.A. Sölkner J. Probst L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gutiérrez G.A. Sölkner J. Probst L. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Wurzinger M. Gutiérrez G.A. Sölkner J. Probst L. |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
small-holder agriculture |
topic |
small-holder agriculture breeding program community-based breeding community-based breeding livestock breeding livestock breeding multi-level perspective https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.02.01 |
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
breeding program community-based breeding community-based breeding livestock breeding livestock breeding multi-level perspective |
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.02.01 |
description |
This research was funded by CONCYTEC through the project IMAGEN–Innovaciones en la mejora genética altoandina: alpacas y llamas (29-2019-FONDECYT-BM-INC.INV). |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2984 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.613505 |
dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85107348675 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2984 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.613505 |
identifier_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85107348675 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación instacron:CONCYTEC |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
instacron_str |
CONCYTEC |
institution |
CONCYTEC |
reponame_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
collection |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@concytec.gob.pe |
_version_ |
1839175535106719744 |
spelling |
Publicationrp08458600rp08456600rp08460600rp08461600Wurzinger M.Gutiérrez G.A.Sölkner J.Probst L.2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2021https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2984https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.6135052-s2.0-85107348675This research was funded by CONCYTEC through the project IMAGEN–Innovaciones en la mejora genética altoandina: alpacas y llamas (29-2019-FONDECYT-BM-INC.INV).Over the past decade, community-based breeding programs (CBBPs) have been promoted as a viable approach to improving smallholder livelihoods through a systematic livestock breeding. CBBPs aim to initiate systematic breeding at the community level, including an organized animal identification and recording of performance and pedigree data. To ensure the breeding programs' continuity, building capacities, and ownership among participants are essential to the approach. This study's purpose was to understand how CBBPs have evolved in specific institutional settings and which dynamics occur in the course of implementation. We addressed these questions in reflective conversations with six coordinators of a diverse sample of CBBPs: goats (Malawi, Uganda, and Mexico), sheep (Ethiopia), alpaca (Peru), and cattle (Burkina Faso). The interviews and analysis were guided by categories of the multi-level perspective. The respondents considered lack of funding and weak institutionalization as the main constraints on the CBBPs. While the idea of participation and localized ownership was at the center of the programs, linear paradigms of knowledge transfer prevailed. In all cases, the impulse to start a CBBP came from individual researchers, who relied on intermediaries, such as extension agents, for implementation. Personal relations and trust were seen as both a factor in the success and a positive outcome of CBBPs. We conclude that these findings have different implications depending on how rural development is conceptualized: proponents of the innovation systems perspective would call for stakeholders to further align their interests and coordinate their actions. Proponents of process-relational concepts, in contrast, would not consider the CBBP a product but a starting-point for initiators and participants to continuously discover new ways of collaboration and engagement. © Copyright © 2021 Wurzinger, Gutiérrez, Sölkner and Probst.Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica - ConcytecengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/small-holder agriculturebreeding program-1community-based breeding-1community-based breeding-1livestock breeding-1livestock breeding-1multi-level perspective-1https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.02.01-1Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?info:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC20.500.12390/2984oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/29842024-05-30 16:12:49.561https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="4e3a8325-d93b-4fac-99b0-d5f6d50cd724"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process?</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2021</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.613505</DOI> <SCP-Number>2-s2.0-85107348675</SCP-Number> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Wurzinger M.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp08458" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Gutiérrez G.A.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp08456" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Sölkner J.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp08460" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Probst L.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp08461" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Frontiers Media S.A.</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <License>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</License> <Keyword>small-holder agriculture</Keyword> <Keyword>breeding program</Keyword> <Keyword>community-based breeding</Keyword> <Keyword>community-based breeding</Keyword> <Keyword>livestock breeding</Keyword> <Keyword>livestock breeding</Keyword> <Keyword>multi-level perspective</Keyword> <Abstract>Over the past decade, community-based breeding programs (CBBPs) have been promoted as a viable approach to improving smallholder livelihoods through a systematic livestock breeding. CBBPs aim to initiate systematic breeding at the community level, including an organized animal identification and recording of performance and pedigree data. To ensure the breeding programs' continuity, building capacities, and ownership among participants are essential to the approach. This study's purpose was to understand how CBBPs have evolved in specific institutional settings and which dynamics occur in the course of implementation. We addressed these questions in reflective conversations with six coordinators of a diverse sample of CBBPs: goats (Malawi, Uganda, and Mexico), sheep (Ethiopia), alpaca (Peru), and cattle (Burkina Faso). The interviews and analysis were guided by categories of the multi-level perspective. The respondents considered lack of funding and weak institutionalization as the main constraints on the CBBPs. While the idea of participation and localized ownership was at the center of the programs, linear paradigms of knowledge transfer prevailed. In all cases, the impulse to start a CBBP came from individual researchers, who relied on intermediaries, such as extension agents, for implementation. Personal relations and trust were seen as both a factor in the success and a positive outcome of CBBPs. We conclude that these findings have different implications depending on how rural development is conceptualized: proponents of the innovation systems perspective would call for stakeholders to further align their interests and coordinate their actions. Proponents of process-relational concepts, in contrast, would not consider the CBBP a product but a starting-point for initiators and participants to continuously discover new ways of collaboration and engagement. © Copyright © 2021 Wurzinger, Gutiérrez, Sölkner and Probst.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1 |
score |
13.210282 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).