Conservation status assessment of the highest forests in the world: Polylepis flavipila forests as a case study
Descripción del Articulo
This research was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnolog?a e Innovaci?n Tecnol?gica-CONCYTEC, under Grant 382-2019-FONDECYT-DE; Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cient?fico, Tecnol?gico y de Innovaci?n Tecnol?gica [382-2019-FONDECYT]; We thank the ?Servicio Nacional Forestal y de Fauna Silves...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
| Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
| Repositorio: | CONCYTEC-Institucional |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2986 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2986 https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2021.1920295 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | status conservation high-Andean ecosystem IUCN Peru Polylepis flavipila https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.05 |
| id |
CONC_15b3bf7438c9a658becc0409b8f57c3c |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2986 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONC |
| network_name_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
| repository_id_str |
4689 |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Conservation status assessment of the highest forests in the world: Polylepis flavipila forests as a case study |
| title |
Conservation status assessment of the highest forests in the world: Polylepis flavipila forests as a case study |
| spellingShingle |
Conservation status assessment of the highest forests in the world: Polylepis flavipila forests as a case study Ames-Martínez F.N. status conservation high-Andean ecosystem IUCN Peru Polylepis flavipila https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.05 |
| title_short |
Conservation status assessment of the highest forests in the world: Polylepis flavipila forests as a case study |
| title_full |
Conservation status assessment of the highest forests in the world: Polylepis flavipila forests as a case study |
| title_fullStr |
Conservation status assessment of the highest forests in the world: Polylepis flavipila forests as a case study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Conservation status assessment of the highest forests in the world: Polylepis flavipila forests as a case study |
| title_sort |
Conservation status assessment of the highest forests in the world: Polylepis flavipila forests as a case study |
| author |
Ames-Martínez F.N. |
| author_facet |
Ames-Martínez F.N. Quispe-Melgar H.R. Renison D. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Quispe-Melgar H.R. Renison D. |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ames-Martínez F.N. Quispe-Melgar H.R. Renison D. |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
status conservation |
| topic |
status conservation high-Andean ecosystem IUCN Peru Polylepis flavipila https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.05 |
| dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
high-Andean ecosystem IUCN Peru Polylepis flavipila |
| dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.05 |
| description |
This research was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnolog?a e Innovaci?n Tecnol?gica-CONCYTEC, under Grant 382-2019-FONDECYT-DE; Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cient?fico, Tecnol?gico y de Innovaci?n Tecnol?gica [382-2019-FONDECYT]; We thank the ?Servicio Nacional Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre? and the ?Servicio Nacional de ?reas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado? for providing authorizations for research under R.D.G. No. 037-2017-SERFOR/DGGSPFFS and R.D. 009-2018-SERNANP-DGANP, respectively. Likewise, we are grateful to Wendy Carolay Navarro Romo, Ciro Ricardo Paredes Huam?n (Negrito) and Jimy Ronie Llacuachaqui Rodr?guez (Timys) for contributing to field work and making it so much fun. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2986 |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2021.1920295 |
| dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85105924645 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2986 https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2021.1920295 |
| identifier_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85105924645 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Neotropical Biodiversity |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor and Francis Ltd. |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor and Francis Ltd. |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación instacron:CONCYTEC |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
| instacron_str |
CONCYTEC |
| institution |
CONCYTEC |
| reponame_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
| collection |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@concytec.gob.pe |
| _version_ |
1839175474579767296 |
| spelling |
Publicationrp06818600rp02402600rp08464600Ames-Martínez F.N.Quispe-Melgar H.R.Renison D.2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2021https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2986https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2021.19202952-s2.0-85105924645This research was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnolog?a e Innovaci?n Tecnol?gica-CONCYTEC, under Grant 382-2019-FONDECYT-DE; Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cient?fico, Tecnol?gico y de Innovaci?n Tecnol?gica [382-2019-FONDECYT]; We thank the ?Servicio Nacional Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre? and the ?Servicio Nacional de ?reas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado? for providing authorizations for research under R.D.G. No. 037-2017-SERFOR/DGGSPFFS and R.D. 009-2018-SERNANP-DGANP, respectively. Likewise, we are grateful to Wendy Carolay Navarro Romo, Ciro Ricardo Paredes Huam?n (Negrito) and Jimy Ronie Llacuachaqui Rodr?guez (Timys) for contributing to field work and making it so much fun.Polylepis forests are one of the most threatened high Andean ecosystems, with 15 species and eight subspecies being categorized as critically endangered, vulnerable or near threatened by IUCN. However, their conservation status is poorly evaluated and could be outdated. As a case study, we evaluated Polylepis flavipila, a species endemic to the Peruvian central Andes, that is categorized as Vulnerable in Peru and is not mentioned in the Global Threatened Species Red List. We used two methods to categorize P. flavipila: (1) a species-level assessment using criteria proposed by IUCN and (2) a population-level assessment of four forests using the more specific criteria proposed by Navarro and collaborators. We recorded 350 relicts of P. flavipila forests as identified from herbariums and other sources. Forest cover was reduced 53% over 45 years as evaluated using satellite images from 1975 and 2020 and we estimated a total area of 458 and 216 km2, respectively. Thus, according to the IUCN criteria, P. flavipila should be classified as Endangered. At the population level, the application of the criteria of Navarro and collaborators results in different threat categories: one of the studied forests is classified as Critically Endangered, two forests as Vulnerable and one as Least Concern. We stress the need for updated categorizations for the 45 described Polylepis tree and shrub species based on the following facts: the only species we tested should change category, the IUCN categorizations were performed 16 to 22 years ago, and there have been many changes in the taxonomy of the genus. The assessment using IUCN criteria should also be complemented with more detailed evaluations at the population level since important differences were detected at a smaller scale, which could help target conservation and restoration resources more efficiently. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica - ConcytecengTaylor and Francis Ltd.Neotropical Biodiversityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/status conservationhigh-Andean ecosystem-1IUCN-1Peru-1Polylepis flavipila-1https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.05-1Conservation status assessment of the highest forests in the world: Polylepis flavipila forests as a case studyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC20.500.12390/2986oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/29862024-05-30 16:12:51.358https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="2a7c6835-9c68-4d0a-841e-6e23c0b86540"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Conservation status assessment of the highest forests in the world: Polylepis flavipila forests as a case study</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>Neotropical Biodiversity</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2021</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2021.1920295</DOI> <SCP-Number>2-s2.0-85105924645</SCP-Number> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Ames-Martínez F.N.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp06818" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Quispe-Melgar H.R.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp02402" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Renison D.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp08464" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Taylor and Francis Ltd.</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <License>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</License> <Keyword>status conservation</Keyword> <Keyword>high-Andean ecosystem</Keyword> <Keyword>IUCN</Keyword> <Keyword>Peru</Keyword> <Keyword>Polylepis flavipila</Keyword> <Abstract>Polylepis forests are one of the most threatened high Andean ecosystems, with 15 species and eight subspecies being categorized as critically endangered, vulnerable or near threatened by IUCN. However, their conservation status is poorly evaluated and could be outdated. As a case study, we evaluated Polylepis flavipila, a species endemic to the Peruvian central Andes, that is categorized as Vulnerable in Peru and is not mentioned in the Global Threatened Species Red List. We used two methods to categorize P. flavipila: (1) a species-level assessment using criteria proposed by IUCN and (2) a population-level assessment of four forests using the more specific criteria proposed by Navarro and collaborators. We recorded 350 relicts of P. flavipila forests as identified from herbariums and other sources. Forest cover was reduced 53% over 45 years as evaluated using satellite images from 1975 and 2020 and we estimated a total area of 458 and 216 km2, respectively. Thus, according to the IUCN criteria, P. flavipila should be classified as Endangered. At the population level, the application of the criteria of Navarro and collaborators results in different threat categories: one of the studied forests is classified as Critically Endangered, two forests as Vulnerable and one as Least Concern. We stress the need for updated categorizations for the 45 described Polylepis tree and shrub species based on the following facts: the only species we tested should change category, the IUCN categorizations were performed 16 to 22 years ago, and there have been many changes in the taxonomy of the genus. The assessment using IUCN criteria should also be complemented with more detailed evaluations at the population level since important differences were detected at a smaller scale, which could help target conservation and restoration resources more efficiently. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1 |
| score |
13.439101 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
