What is equality?

Descripción del Articulo

This article offers a critical analysis of the concept of equality, exploring its multiple interpretations and key distinctions within Western thought. It seeks to clarify conceptual ambiguities that often hinder constructive debate on social justice. Two main forms of equality are discussed: simple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Adachi, Hidehiko
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
Repositorio:CAL-Chornancap
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/147
Enlace del recurso:https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/147
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Igualdad social
Justicia distributiva
Filosofía Política
Derechos humanos
Políticas Públicas
Social equality
Distributive justice
Political philosophy
Human rights
Public policy
id CAL-RChorn_826cb08867e311ff313b35c406e9f30e
oai_identifier_str oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/147
network_acronym_str CAL-RChorn
network_name_str CAL-Chornancap
repository_id_str
spelling What is equality?¿Qué es la igualdad?Adachi, HidehikoIgualdad socialJusticia distributivaFilosofía PolíticaDerechos humanosPolíticas PúblicasSocial equalityDistributive justicePolitical philosophyHuman rightsPublic policyThis article offers a critical analysis of the concept of equality, exploring its multiple interpretations and key distinctions within Western thought. It seeks to clarify conceptual ambiguities that often hinder constructive debate on social justice. Two main forms of equality are discussed: simple equality, which assumes identical treatment regardless of differences, and proportional equality, which allocates resources based on relevant attributes such as effort, need, or ability. Drawing on Aristotle’s philosophy and modern developments, we examine how both notions coexist and interact, especially in contexts of distributive justice. The paper also explores normative principles used to justify social distributions: contribution, need, benefit, and capacity. It argues that clarifying these categories enables partial consensus on fairness, crucial for designing equitable public policies. The article combines philosophical depth with practical relevance, offering a useful framework for navigating contemporary challenges related to equity and justice.Este artículo analiza críticamente el concepto de igualdad, abordando sus múltiples interpretaciones y distinciones clave dentro del pensamiento occidental. Se propone una clarificación conceptual que permita superar malentendidos comunes, facilitando un debate más constructivo en torno a la justicia social. Se destacan dos formas fundamentales: la igualdad simple, entendida como trato idéntico sin considerar diferencias individuales, y la igualdad proporcional, basada en la distribución según atributos relevantes como esfuerzo, necesidad o habilidad. A partir del pensamiento de Aristóteles y desarrollos contemporáneos, se examina cómo ambas nociones coexisten e interactúan, especialmente en contextos de justicia distributiva. También se analizan principios normativos utilizados para justificar distribuciones sociales: contribución, necesidad, beneficio y capacidad. El texto concluye que clarificar estas ideas puede facilitar consensos parciales sobre la igualdad, esenciales para el diseño de políticas públicas más equitativas. La propuesta combina profundidad filosófica con aplicabilidad práctica, y ofrece un marco útil para abordar los desafíos actuales en torno a la equidad y la justicia.Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque2025-07-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/14710.61542/rjch.147Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): The dimension of equality in fundamental rights; 53–57Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2025): La dimensión de la igualdad en los derechos fundamentales; 53–572961-29342961-292610.61542/rjch.v3i1reponame:CAL-Chornancapinstname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayequeinstacron:CALspahttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/147/132https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/1472025-12-30T20:46:47Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What is equality?
¿Qué es la igualdad?
title What is equality?
spellingShingle What is equality?
Adachi, Hidehiko
Igualdad social
Justicia distributiva
Filosofía Política
Derechos humanos
Políticas Públicas
Social equality
Distributive justice
Political philosophy
Human rights
Public policy
title_short What is equality?
title_full What is equality?
title_fullStr What is equality?
title_full_unstemmed What is equality?
title_sort What is equality?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Adachi, Hidehiko
author Adachi, Hidehiko
author_facet Adachi, Hidehiko
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Igualdad social
Justicia distributiva
Filosofía Política
Derechos humanos
Políticas Públicas
Social equality
Distributive justice
Political philosophy
Human rights
Public policy
topic Igualdad social
Justicia distributiva
Filosofía Política
Derechos humanos
Políticas Públicas
Social equality
Distributive justice
Political philosophy
Human rights
Public policy
description This article offers a critical analysis of the concept of equality, exploring its multiple interpretations and key distinctions within Western thought. It seeks to clarify conceptual ambiguities that often hinder constructive debate on social justice. Two main forms of equality are discussed: simple equality, which assumes identical treatment regardless of differences, and proportional equality, which allocates resources based on relevant attributes such as effort, need, or ability. Drawing on Aristotle’s philosophy and modern developments, we examine how both notions coexist and interact, especially in contexts of distributive justice. The paper also explores normative principles used to justify social distributions: contribution, need, benefit, and capacity. It argues that clarifying these categories enables partial consensus on fairness, crucial for designing equitable public policies. The article combines philosophical depth with practical relevance, offering a useful framework for navigating contemporary challenges related to equity and justice.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-07-14
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/147
10.61542/rjch.147
url https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/147
identifier_str_mv 10.61542/rjch.147
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/147/132
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): The dimension of equality in fundamental rights; 53–57
Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2025): La dimensión de la igualdad en los derechos fundamentales; 53–57
2961-2934
2961-2926
10.61542/rjch.v3i1
reponame:CAL-Chornancap
instname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
instacron:CAL
instname_str Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
instacron_str CAL
institution CAL
reponame_str CAL-Chornancap
collection CAL-Chornancap
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1870083421905092608
score 13.922664
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).