EVALUATION OF FETAL GROWTH IN BIOMETRICS ULTRASOUND TWINS AND SMALL SUITABLE FOR AGE GESTATIONAL

Descripción del Articulo

OBJECTIVE. To determine fetal growth of appropriate and small for gestational age twins by ultrasound. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Live twin deliveries attended at A. Loayza General Hospital between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2000, with minimum 3 ultrasound studies during pregnancy when biparietal d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Acosta, Elard, Mere, Juan
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.spog:article/445
Enlace del recurso:http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/445
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id 2304-5132_aeb79b6e8a1a823ee44b36537405d43b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.spog:article/445
network_acronym_str 2304-5132
repository_id_str .
network_name_str Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
spelling EVALUATION OF FETAL GROWTH IN BIOMETRICS ULTRASOUND TWINS AND SMALL SUITABLE FOR AGE GESTATIONALEVALUACIÓN DEL CRECIMIENTO FETAL POR BIOMETRIA ULTRASONOGRÁFICA EN GEMELOS ADECUADOS Y PEQUEÑOS PARA EDAD GESTACIONALAcosta, ElardMere, JuanOBJECTIVE. To determine fetal growth of appropriate and small for gestational age twins by ultrasound. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Live twin deliveries attended at A. Loayza General Hospital between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2000, with minimum 3 ultrasound studies during pregnancy when biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, femur length and estimated fetal weight were determined. Seventy-nine adequate (AGA) and small (SGA) for gestational age were studied, mcluding sexgender, placenta type and complications. RESULT. The abdominal circumference between twin AGA and SGA reaches a difference of 20 mm at 39,2 weeks, 15 mm at 35,6, and 10 mm at 31,1 weeks. Biparietal diameter differed 5 mm at 39,6 weeks, 4 mm at 30,4 and 3 mm at 25,2 weeks, Femur length reached maximum difference of 2,81 mm at 17,4 weeks and fetal weight 17% at 28,8 weeks. No significant differences were found with regards to sex and placenta type; fetal growth retardation was more significant in SGA. CONCLUSIONS. Adequate for gestational age twins growth pattern differ from that of small for gestational age, with clinically significant late differences in both abdominal circumference and biparietal diameter. At the 2nd trimester differences become evident in both BPD and fetal weight.OBJETIVOS. Describir el crecimiento fetal de productos adecuados y pequeños para edad gestacional de embarazos gemelares mediante ultrasonagrafía. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS. Partos gemelares vivos ocurridos en el Hospital General A. Loaysa entre el 1 de enero de 1996 y 31 de diciembre de 2000, con 3 estudios ecográficos como mínimo durante la gestación, en los que se evaluó diámetro biparietal, circunferencia abdominal, longitud de fémur y peso promedio fetal. Se estudio 79 gemelos adecuados AEG y PEG, de 15 mm a las 39,6 semanas, de 4 mm a las 30,4 y de 3mm a las 25,2 semanas. La longitud de fémur mostró una diferencia máxima de 17% a las 28,8 semanas. No se encontró diferencias significativas entre el sexo o tipo de placenta; el retardo del crecimiento fetal fue significativamente mayor en PEG. CONCLUSIONES. Los gemelos adecuados para edad gestacional tienen un patrón de crecimiento diferente al de los pequeños para edad gestacional alcanzando tardiamente diferencias clínicamente significativamente en ele circunferencia abdominal y el diámetro biparietal. En el segundo trimestre las diferencias se van haciendo evidentes en el DBP y el piso fetal.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2015-05-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/44510.31403/rpgo.v49i445Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 49, Núm. 4 (2003); 206-2132304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/445/413info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-31T15:51:39Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EVALUATION OF FETAL GROWTH IN BIOMETRICS ULTRASOUND TWINS AND SMALL SUITABLE FOR AGE GESTATIONAL
EVALUACIÓN DEL CRECIMIENTO FETAL POR BIOMETRIA ULTRASONOGRÁFICA EN GEMELOS ADECUADOS Y PEQUEÑOS PARA EDAD GESTACIONAL
title EVALUATION OF FETAL GROWTH IN BIOMETRICS ULTRASOUND TWINS AND SMALL SUITABLE FOR AGE GESTATIONAL
spellingShingle EVALUATION OF FETAL GROWTH IN BIOMETRICS ULTRASOUND TWINS AND SMALL SUITABLE FOR AGE GESTATIONAL
Acosta, Elard
title_short EVALUATION OF FETAL GROWTH IN BIOMETRICS ULTRASOUND TWINS AND SMALL SUITABLE FOR AGE GESTATIONAL
title_full EVALUATION OF FETAL GROWTH IN BIOMETRICS ULTRASOUND TWINS AND SMALL SUITABLE FOR AGE GESTATIONAL
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF FETAL GROWTH IN BIOMETRICS ULTRASOUND TWINS AND SMALL SUITABLE FOR AGE GESTATIONAL
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF FETAL GROWTH IN BIOMETRICS ULTRASOUND TWINS AND SMALL SUITABLE FOR AGE GESTATIONAL
title_sort EVALUATION OF FETAL GROWTH IN BIOMETRICS ULTRASOUND TWINS AND SMALL SUITABLE FOR AGE GESTATIONAL
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Acosta, Elard
Mere, Juan
author Acosta, Elard
author_facet Acosta, Elard
Mere, Juan
author_role author
author2 Mere, Juan
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv OBJECTIVE. To determine fetal growth of appropriate and small for gestational age twins by ultrasound. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Live twin deliveries attended at A. Loayza General Hospital between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2000, with minimum 3 ultrasound studies during pregnancy when biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, femur length and estimated fetal weight were determined. Seventy-nine adequate (AGA) and small (SGA) for gestational age were studied, mcluding sexgender, placenta type and complications. RESULT. The abdominal circumference between twin AGA and SGA reaches a difference of 20 mm at 39,2 weeks, 15 mm at 35,6, and 10 mm at 31,1 weeks. Biparietal diameter differed 5 mm at 39,6 weeks, 4 mm at 30,4 and 3 mm at 25,2 weeks, Femur length reached maximum difference of 2,81 mm at 17,4 weeks and fetal weight 17% at 28,8 weeks. No significant differences were found with regards to sex and placenta type; fetal growth retardation was more significant in SGA. CONCLUSIONS. Adequate for gestational age twins growth pattern differ from that of small for gestational age, with clinically significant late differences in both abdominal circumference and biparietal diameter. At the 2nd trimester differences become evident in both BPD and fetal weight.
OBJETIVOS. Describir el crecimiento fetal de productos adecuados y pequeños para edad gestacional de embarazos gemelares mediante ultrasonagrafía. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS. Partos gemelares vivos ocurridos en el Hospital General A. Loaysa entre el 1 de enero de 1996 y 31 de diciembre de 2000, con 3 estudios ecográficos como mínimo durante la gestación, en los que se evaluó diámetro biparietal, circunferencia abdominal, longitud de fémur y peso promedio fetal. Se estudio 79 gemelos adecuados AEG y PEG, de 15 mm a las 39,6 semanas, de 4 mm a las 30,4 y de 3mm a las 25,2 semanas. La longitud de fémur mostró una diferencia máxima de 17% a las 28,8 semanas. No se encontró diferencias significativas entre el sexo o tipo de placenta; el retardo del crecimiento fetal fue significativamente mayor en PEG. CONCLUSIONES. Los gemelos adecuados para edad gestacional tienen un patrón de crecimiento diferente al de los pequeños para edad gestacional alcanzando tardiamente diferencias clínicamente significativamente en ele circunferencia abdominal y el diámetro biparietal. En el segundo trimestre las diferencias se van haciendo evidentes en el DBP y el piso fetal.
description OBJECTIVE. To determine fetal growth of appropriate and small for gestational age twins by ultrasound. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Live twin deliveries attended at A. Loayza General Hospital between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2000, with minimum 3 ultrasound studies during pregnancy when biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, femur length and estimated fetal weight were determined. Seventy-nine adequate (AGA) and small (SGA) for gestational age were studied, mcluding sexgender, placenta type and complications. RESULT. The abdominal circumference between twin AGA and SGA reaches a difference of 20 mm at 39,2 weeks, 15 mm at 35,6, and 10 mm at 31,1 weeks. Biparietal diameter differed 5 mm at 39,6 weeks, 4 mm at 30,4 and 3 mm at 25,2 weeks, Femur length reached maximum difference of 2,81 mm at 17,4 weeks and fetal weight 17% at 28,8 weeks. No significant differences were found with regards to sex and placenta type; fetal growth retardation was more significant in SGA. CONCLUSIONS. Adequate for gestational age twins growth pattern differ from that of small for gestational age, with clinically significant late differences in both abdominal circumference and biparietal diameter. At the 2nd trimester differences become evident in both BPD and fetal weight.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/445
10.31403/rpgo.v49i445
url http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/445
identifier_str_mv 10.31403/rpgo.v49i445
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/445/413
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 49, Núm. 4 (2003); 206-213
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
reponame_str Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1701289837024247808
score 13.924177
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).