EVALUATION OF FETAL GROWTH IN BIOMETRICS ULTRASOUND TWINS AND SMALL SUITABLE FOR AGE GESTATIONAL

Descripción del Articulo

OBJECTIVE. To determine fetal growth of appropriate and small for gestational age twins by ultrasound. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Live twin deliveries attended at A. Loayza General Hospital between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2000, with minimum 3 ultrasound studies during pregnancy when biparietal d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Acosta, Elard, Mere, Juan
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.spog:article/445
Enlace del recurso:http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/445
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE. To determine fetal growth of appropriate and small for gestational age twins by ultrasound. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Live twin deliveries attended at A. Loayza General Hospital between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2000, with minimum 3 ultrasound studies during pregnancy when biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, femur length and estimated fetal weight were determined. Seventy-nine adequate (AGA) and small (SGA) for gestational age were studied, mcluding sexgender, placenta type and complications. RESULT. The abdominal circumference between twin AGA and SGA reaches a difference of 20 mm at 39,2 weeks, 15 mm at 35,6, and 10 mm at 31,1 weeks. Biparietal diameter differed 5 mm at 39,6 weeks, 4 mm at 30,4 and 3 mm at 25,2 weeks, Femur length reached maximum difference of 2,81 mm at 17,4 weeks and fetal weight 17% at 28,8 weeks. No significant differences were found with regards to sex and placenta type; fetal growth retardation was more significant in SGA. CONCLUSIONS. Adequate for gestational age twins growth pattern differ from that of small for gestational age, with clinically significant late differences in both abdominal circumference and biparietal diameter. At the 2nd trimester differences become evident in both BPD and fetal weight.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).