Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate

Descripción del Articulo

In the present investigation, an instrument for evaluating postgraduate research competencies was designed and validated in content. For its design, aspects evidenced in the development of the thesis work were integrated. The instrument was reviewed by four experts for the facie validity analysis an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Aliaga Pacora, Alicia Agromelis, Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran, Herrera Meza, Raúl
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad Peruana Unión
Repositorio:Revista UPEU - Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe:article/632
Enlace del recurso:https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/632
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Socioformative rubric
investigative competencies
validity
reliability
expert judgment
Rúbrica socioformativa
competencias investigativas
validez
confiabilidad
juicio de expertos
id 2304-0335_7685c034211e4a666dd605504c02d1d0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe:article/632
network_acronym_str 2304-0335
repository_id_str .
network_name_str Revista UPEU - Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios
spelling Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduateDiseño y validez de contenido de una rúbrica analítica socioformativa para evaluar competencias investigativas en posgradoAliaga Pacora, Alicia AgromelisJuárez Hernández, Luis GibranHerrera Meza, RaúlSocioformative rubricinvestigative competenciesvalidityreliabilityexpert judgmentRúbrica socioformativacompetencias investigativasvalidezconfiabilidadjuicio de expertosIn the present investigation, an instrument for evaluating postgraduate research competencies was designed and validated in content. For its design, aspects evidenced in the development of the thesis work were integrated. The instrument was reviewed by four experts for the facie validity analysis and an expert judgment was made for the content validity analysis. At the end of these phases, an instrument was piloted with 38 advisers to assess the degree of understanding of instructions and items, as well as the reliability of the instrument. The instrument was designed as a socio-formative analytical rubric integrating five aspects of the development of the thesis work through 11 items and for each of them five levels of performance with their own descriptor. The experts expressed writing suggestions to optimize the rubric. The expert judges validated the items in content (Aiken's V> 0.80; LV CI 95%>0.75). The piloting showed a good degree of understanding of the instructions and items and relevance of the questions and it was determined that the instrument has reliability (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.832). A valid content instrument is presented; however, it is necessary to continue with the analysis of its psychometric properties (construct validity and reliability)En la presente investigación, se diseñó y validó en contenido un instrumento para evaluar competencias investigativas en posgrado. Para su diseño se integraron aspectos evidenciados en el desarrollo del trabajo de tesis. El instrumento fue revisado por cuatro expertos para el análisis de validez de facie y para el análisis de validez de contenido se efectuó un juicio de expertos. Concluidas estas fases se realizó un pilotaje del instrumento con 38 asesores para evaluar el grado de comprensión de instrucciones e ítems, así como la confiabilidad del instrumento. El instrumento se diseñó como rúbrica analítica socioformativa integrando cinco aspectos del desarrollo del trabajo de tesis a través de 11 ítems y para cada uno de ellos cinco niveles de desempeño con un descriptor propio. Los expertos expresaron sugerencias de redacción para optimizar la rúbrica. Los jueces expertos validaron en contenido los ítems (V de Aiken>0.80; VI del IC al 95%>0.75). El pilotaje mostró un buen grado de comprensión de las instrucciones e ítems y relevancia de las preguntas y se determinó que el instrumento posee confiabilidad (Alfa de Cronbach: 0.832). Se presenta un instrumento válido en contenido, sin embargo, se requiere proseguir con el análisis de sus propiedades psicométricas (validez de constructo y confiabilidad).Universidad Peruana Unión2021-01-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo revisado por paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/63210.17162/au.v11i2.632Apuntes Universitarios; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2021): Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios; 62 - 822304-03352225-713610.17162/au.v11i2reponame:Revista UPEU - Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitariosinstname:Universidad Peruana Unióninstacron:UPEUspahttps://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/632/719https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/632/731Derechos de autor 2021 Alicia Agromelis Aliaga Pacora, Luis Gibran Juárez Hernández, Raúl Herrera Mezahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-30T16:15:26Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate
Diseño y validez de contenido de una rúbrica analítica socioformativa para evaluar competencias investigativas en posgrado
title Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate
spellingShingle Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate
Aliaga Pacora, Alicia Agromelis
Socioformative rubric
investigative competencies
validity
reliability
expert judgment
Rúbrica socioformativa
competencias investigativas
validez
confiabilidad
juicio de expertos
title_short Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate
title_full Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate
title_fullStr Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate
title_full_unstemmed Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate
title_sort Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Aliaga Pacora, Alicia Agromelis
Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran
Herrera Meza, Raúl
author Aliaga Pacora, Alicia Agromelis
author_facet Aliaga Pacora, Alicia Agromelis
Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran
Herrera Meza, Raúl
author_role author
author2 Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran
Herrera Meza, Raúl
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Socioformative rubric
investigative competencies
validity
reliability
expert judgment
Rúbrica socioformativa
competencias investigativas
validez
confiabilidad
juicio de expertos
topic Socioformative rubric
investigative competencies
validity
reliability
expert judgment
Rúbrica socioformativa
competencias investigativas
validez
confiabilidad
juicio de expertos
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In the present investigation, an instrument for evaluating postgraduate research competencies was designed and validated in content. For its design, aspects evidenced in the development of the thesis work were integrated. The instrument was reviewed by four experts for the facie validity analysis and an expert judgment was made for the content validity analysis. At the end of these phases, an instrument was piloted with 38 advisers to assess the degree of understanding of instructions and items, as well as the reliability of the instrument. The instrument was designed as a socio-formative analytical rubric integrating five aspects of the development of the thesis work through 11 items and for each of them five levels of performance with their own descriptor. The experts expressed writing suggestions to optimize the rubric. The expert judges validated the items in content (Aiken's V> 0.80; LV CI 95%>0.75). The piloting showed a good degree of understanding of the instructions and items and relevance of the questions and it was determined that the instrument has reliability (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.832). A valid content instrument is presented; however, it is necessary to continue with the analysis of its psychometric properties (construct validity and reliability)
En la presente investigación, se diseñó y validó en contenido un instrumento para evaluar competencias investigativas en posgrado. Para su diseño se integraron aspectos evidenciados en el desarrollo del trabajo de tesis. El instrumento fue revisado por cuatro expertos para el análisis de validez de facie y para el análisis de validez de contenido se efectuó un juicio de expertos. Concluidas estas fases se realizó un pilotaje del instrumento con 38 asesores para evaluar el grado de comprensión de instrucciones e ítems, así como la confiabilidad del instrumento. El instrumento se diseñó como rúbrica analítica socioformativa integrando cinco aspectos del desarrollo del trabajo de tesis a través de 11 ítems y para cada uno de ellos cinco niveles de desempeño con un descriptor propio. Los expertos expresaron sugerencias de redacción para optimizar la rúbrica. Los jueces expertos validaron en contenido los ítems (V de Aiken>0.80; VI del IC al 95%>0.75). El pilotaje mostró un buen grado de comprensión de las instrucciones e ítems y relevancia de las preguntas y se determinó que el instrumento posee confiabilidad (Alfa de Cronbach: 0.832). Se presenta un instrumento válido en contenido, sin embargo, se requiere proseguir con el análisis de sus propiedades psicométricas (validez de constructo y confiabilidad).
description In the present investigation, an instrument for evaluating postgraduate research competencies was designed and validated in content. For its design, aspects evidenced in the development of the thesis work were integrated. The instrument was reviewed by four experts for the facie validity analysis and an expert judgment was made for the content validity analysis. At the end of these phases, an instrument was piloted with 38 advisers to assess the degree of understanding of instructions and items, as well as the reliability of the instrument. The instrument was designed as a socio-formative analytical rubric integrating five aspects of the development of the thesis work through 11 items and for each of them five levels of performance with their own descriptor. The experts expressed writing suggestions to optimize the rubric. The expert judges validated the items in content (Aiken's V> 0.80; LV CI 95%>0.75). The piloting showed a good degree of understanding of the instructions and items and relevance of the questions and it was determined that the instrument has reliability (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.832). A valid content instrument is presented; however, it is necessary to continue with the analysis of its psychometric properties (construct validity and reliability)
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artículo revisado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/632
10.17162/au.v11i2.632
url https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/632
identifier_str_mv 10.17162/au.v11i2.632
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/632/719
https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/632/731
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Alicia Agromelis Aliaga Pacora, Luis Gibran Juárez Hernández, Raúl Herrera Meza
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Alicia Agromelis Aliaga Pacora, Luis Gibran Juárez Hernández, Raúl Herrera Meza
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana Unión
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana Unión
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Apuntes Universitarios; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2021): Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios; 62 - 82
2304-0335
2225-7136
10.17162/au.v11i2
reponame:Revista UPEU - Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios
instname:Universidad Peruana Unión
instacron:UPEU
reponame_str Revista UPEU - Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios
collection Revista UPEU - Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios
instname_str Universidad Peruana Unión
instacron_str UPEU
institution UPEU
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1701200634381860864
score 13.871978
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).