In-house media accountability instruments: Spanish journalists' and citizens' perceptions
Descripción del Articulo
In a context characterized by structural transformations and the credibility crisis of journalism, media accountability is of outmost importance. Focusing on the Spanish context, this article examines journalists’ and citizens’ perceptions of in-house accountability instruments. To do so, an online...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
| Institución: | Universidad de Piura |
| Repositorio: | Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/1648 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1648 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| id |
2227-1465_84c1306e65792960ba6fa1d9e73426c6 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/1648 |
| network_acronym_str |
2227-1465 |
| repository_id_str |
|
| network_name_str |
Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
In-house media accountability instruments: Spanish journalists' and citizens' perceptions Instrumentos de rendición de cuentas impulsados por los medios de comunicación: percepción de los periodistas y ciudadanos españoles |
| title |
In-house media accountability instruments: Spanish journalists' and citizens' perceptions |
| spellingShingle |
In-house media accountability instruments: Spanish journalists' and citizens' perceptions Ramon, Xavier |
| title_short |
In-house media accountability instruments: Spanish journalists' and citizens' perceptions |
| title_full |
In-house media accountability instruments: Spanish journalists' and citizens' perceptions |
| title_fullStr |
In-house media accountability instruments: Spanish journalists' and citizens' perceptions |
| title_full_unstemmed |
In-house media accountability instruments: Spanish journalists' and citizens' perceptions |
| title_sort |
In-house media accountability instruments: Spanish journalists' and citizens' perceptions |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ramon, Xavier Mauri-Ríos, Marcel Díaz-Campo, Jesús |
| author |
Ramon, Xavier |
| author_facet |
Ramon, Xavier Mauri-Ríos, Marcel Díaz-Campo, Jesús |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Mauri-Ríos, Marcel Díaz-Campo, Jesús |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In a context characterized by structural transformations and the credibility crisis of journalism, media accountability is of outmost importance. Focusing on the Spanish context, this article examines journalists’ and citizens’ perceptions of in-house accountability instruments. To do so, an online survey was administered to Spanish journalists, six citizen focus groups were established and 19 in-depth interviews were conducted with experts and representatives from professional associations. The results reveal that journalists’ evaluation of media accountability instruments is modest. From the citizens’ perspective, the lack of visibility and relative distrust toward these instruments are highlighted. With the goal of stimulating the debate and decision-making, an open access platform has been built to evaluate if media organizations have developed these fundamental instruments to promote transparency, self-regulation and participation. En un contexto caracterizado por transformaciones estructurales y la crisis de credibilidad del periodismo, la rendición de cuentas de los medios adquiere una importancia central. Focalizándose en el contexto español, este artículo examina las percepciones de los periodistas y los ciudadanos sobre los mecanismos de accountability impulsados por los medios. Para ello se administró una encuesta online a periodistas, se celebraron seis grupos de discusión con ciudadanos y se realizaron 19 entrevistas en profundidad con expertos y representantes de asociaciones profesionales. Los resultados revelan la modesta evaluación que los periodistas hacen de estos instrumentos. Desde la perspectiva ciudadana, se subraya la falta de visibilidad y relativa desconfianza respecto estos mecanismos. Con el objetivo de incentivar la reflexión y la posterior toma de decisiones, se ha diseñado una plataforma open access que permite evaluar si los medios disponen de estos instrumentos clave para fomentar la transparencia, la autorregulación y la participación. |
| description |
In a context characterized by structural transformations and the credibility crisis of journalism, media accountability is of outmost importance. Focusing on the Spanish context, this article examines journalists’ and citizens’ perceptions of in-house accountability instruments. To do so, an online survey was administered to Spanish journalists, six citizen focus groups were established and 19 in-depth interviews were conducted with experts and representatives from professional associations. The results reveal that journalists’ evaluation of media accountability instruments is modest. From the citizens’ perspective, the lack of visibility and relative distrust toward these instruments are highlighted. With the goal of stimulating the debate and decision-making, an open access platform has been built to evaluate if media organizations have developed these fundamental instruments to promote transparency, self-regulation and participation. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-10 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Article evaluated by pairs text Artículo evaluado por pares texto |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1648 10.26441/RC19.1-2020-A13 |
| url |
https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1648 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.26441/RC19.1-2020-A13 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1648/1360 https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1648/1497 https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1648/1524 /*ref*/Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211 Almiron, N., Narberhaus, M., & Mauri-Ríos, M. (2016). Mapping media accountability in stateless nations: the case of Catalonia. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 8(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/ 10.1386/cjcs.8.2.207_1 Alsius, S. (1999). Codis ètics del periodisme televisiu. Barcelona: Pòrtic. Alsius, S. (Ed.) (2010). The ethical values of journalists. Field research among media professionals in Catalonia. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Alsius, S., Rodríguez-Martínez, R., & Mauri-Ríos, M. (2018). New formats and old crisis. En T. Eberwein, S. Fengler, & M. Karmasin (Eds.), The European Handbook of Media Accountability (pp. 243–250). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Aznar, H. (1999). Ética y periodismo. Barcelona: Paidós. Aznar, H., & Serrano-Moreno, J. (2017). Autorregulación de la comunicación: análisis de las cien primeras resoluciones de la Comisión de Arbitraje, Quejas y Deontología de la FAPE. El Profesional de la Información, 26(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.mar.04 Bertrand, C. J. (2018). Media ethics and accountability systems. New York: Routledge. Bjerke, P. (2018). Norway: Journalistic power limits media accountability. En T. Eberwein, S. Fengler, & M. Karmasin (Eds.), The European Handbook of Media Accountability (pp. 180–189). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Bovens, M., Goodin, R.E., & T. Schillemans (2014). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Broersma, M. (2019). The legitimacy paradox. Journalism, 20(1), 92–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918806736 Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5a ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Campos-Domínguez, E., & Redondo-García, M. (2015). Meta periodismo y transparencia informativa en el periodismo del siglo XXI. Obets. Revista de ciencias sociales, 10(1), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2015.10.1.07 Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R.A. (2009). Normative theories of the media. Journalism in democratic societies. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Conboy, M. (2014). Celebrity journalism – an oxymoron? Forms and functions of a genre. Journalism, 15(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913488722 Craft, S., Vos, T., & Wolfgang, J. D. (2015). Reader comments as press criticism: Implications for the journalistic field. Journalism, 17(6), 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915579332 Culver, K. B. (2017). Disengaged ethics: Code development and journalism’s relationship with “the public”. Journalism Practice, 11(4), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1121788 Diakopoulos, N., & Koliska, M. (2017). Algorithmic transparency in the news media. Digital Journalism, 5(7), 809–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1208053 Díaz-Campo, J., & Segado-Boj, F. (2015). Journalism ethics in a digital environment: how journalistic codes of ethics have been adapted to the Internet and ICTs in countries around the world. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 735–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.03.004 Eberwein, T., Fengler, S., Philipp, S., & Ille, M. (2014). Counting Media Accountability – the Concept and Methodology of the MediaAcT Survey. En S. Fengler, T. Eberwein, G. Mazzoleni, C. Porlezza, & S. Russ-Mohl (Eds.), Journalists and media accountability. An international study of news people in the digital age (pp: 65–79). Nueva York: Peter Lang. Eberwein, T., Fengler, S., Lauk, E., & Leppik-Bork, T. (Eds.) (2011). Mapping media accountability – in Europe and beyond. Colonia: Helbert Von Halem Verlag. English, P. (2016). Mapping the sports journalism field: Bourdieu and broadsheet newsrooms. Journalism, 17(8), 1001–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915576728 Fengler, S. (2012). Holding the news media accountable: a study of media reporters and media critics in the United States. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(4), 818–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000405 Fengler, S., Eberwein, T., Mazzoleni, G., Porlezza, C., & Russ-Mohl, S. (2014). Journalists and media accountability. An international study of news people in the digital age. Nueva York: Peter Lang. Fengler, S., Eberwein, T., Alsius, S., Baisnée, O., Bichler, K., Dobek-Ostrowska, B., & Zambrano, S. (2015). How effective is media self-regulation? Results from a comparative survey on European journalists. European Journal of Communication, 30(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114561009 Ferruci, P. (2018). It is in the numbers: How market orientation impacts journalists’ use of news metrics. Journalism, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807056 Ferruci, P. (2019). The End of Ombudsmen? 21st-Century Journalism and Reader Representatives. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018805986 García-Avilés, J.A. (2019). Examining media accountability in online media and the role of active audiences. En T. Eberwein, S. Fengler, & Karmasin, M. (Eds.), Media accountability in the era of post-truth politics: European challenges and perspectives (pp. 270–283). Londres: Routledge. Gutiérrez del Álamo, P. (2015). El defensor del lector de El País (1985-2010). Una experiencia pionera en España. Málaga: Universidad de Málaga. Hallin, D.C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hameleers, M., & van der Meer, T. (2019). Misinformation and polarization in a high-choice media environment: How effective are political fact-checkers? Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218819671 Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the Nexus: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Trust in the Press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695 Harro-Loit, H. (2015). Journalists’ views about accountability to different societal groups. Journal of Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 30(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2014.985296 Haydon, G. (1978). On being responsible. The Philosophical Quarterly, 28(110), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2219043 Higgins Joyce, V., Saldaña, M., Schmitz, A., & Alves, R.C. (2017). Ethical perspectives in Latin America’s journalism community: A comparative analysis of acceptance of controversial practice for investigative reporting. International Communication Gazette, 79(5), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048516688131 Himelboim, I., & Limor, Y. (2011). Media Institutions, News Organizations, and the Journalistic Social Role Worldwide: A Cross-National and Cross-Organizational Study of Codes of Ethics. Mass Communication & Society, 14(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903359719 Hodges, L.W. (1986). Defining press responsibility: a functional approach. En D. Elliot (Ed.), Responsible journalism (pp. 13–31). Beverly Hills, California: Sage. Hutchins, B., & Boyle, R. (2017). A community of practice: Sport journalism, mobile media and institutional change. Digital Journalism, 5(5), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1234147 Joseph, N. L. (2011). Correcting the record. Journalism Practice, 5(6): 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.587670 Justel, S., Micó, J.L., & Ordeix, E. (2018). Governing the Media: Web Analytics in Spanish Newsrooms. Trípodos, 42, 93–106. Karlsson, M., Clerwall, C., & Nord, L. (2017). Do not stand corrected. Transparency and users’ attitudes to inaccurate news and corrections in online journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654680 Karmasin, M., Kraus, D., Kaltenbrunner, A., & Bichler, K. (2014). Media Ethics as Institutional Ethics – the Potential of Corporate Social Responsibility. En S. Fengler, T. Eberwein, G. Mazzoleni, C. Porlezza & S. Russ-Mohl (Eds.), Journalists and Media Accountability. An International Study of News People in the Digital Age (pp: 231–248). Nueva York: Peter Lang. Kendall, M., & Gibbons, J.D. (1990). Rank Correlation Methods. Charles Griffin Book Series (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Luengo, M., Maciá-Barber, C., & Requejo-Alemán, J.L. (2017). Evaluating organisational ethics in Spanish news media. Journalism, 18(9), 1142–1162. Maciá, C. (2006). La figura del defensor del lector, del oyente y del telespectador. Madrid: Universitas. Mauri-Ríos, M., & Ramon, X. (2015). Nuevos sistemas de rendición de cuentas de la información periodística. Una exploración del escenario online español. El Profesional de la Información, 24(4), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.jul.04 Mauri-Ríos, M., Rodríguez-Martínez, R., Figueras-Maz, M., & Fedele, M. (2018). Press councils as a traditional instrument of media self-regulation: The perceptions of European journalists. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 7(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms.7.2.221_1 Mayes, I. (2004). Trust Me – I’m an ombudsman. British Journalism Review, 15(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956474804046018 McQuail, D. (1997). Accountability of media to society. Principles and means. European Journal of Communication, 12(4), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323197012004004 McQuail, D. (2003). Media Accountability and Freedom of Publication. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. Meltzer, K., & Martik, E. (2017). Journalists as communities of practice. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 41(3), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859917706158 Neveu, E. (2019). The challenge of thinking ecologically. Journalism, 20(1), 198–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918808139 Nolan, D., & Marjoribanks, T. (2011). Public editors and media governance at The Guardian and The New York Times. Journalism Practice, 5(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2010.482764 Pastor, L. (2010). Teoría de las cartas al director. La gestión periodística del público. Barcelona: UOC. Plaisance, P.L. (2000). The concept of media accountability reconsidered. Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 15(4), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327728JMME1504_5 Raeymaeckers, K. (2005). Letters to the Editor: A Feedback Opportunity Turned into a Marketing Tool. European Journal of Communication, 20(2), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105052298 Ramon, X., Mauri-Ríos, M., & Alcalá-Anguiano, F. (2016). Transparencia informativa, autorregulación y participación del público. Comunicación y Sociedad, 25, 101–125. Ramon, X., Billings, A. C., & Rojas-Torrijos, J. L. (2019). Interviews with Former ESPN Ombudsmen / Public Editors Kelly McBride, Robert Lipsyte, and Jim Brady. International Journal of Sport Communication, 12(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2018-0127 Ramon, X., & Tulloch, C. (2019). Life Beyond Clickbait Journalism: A Transnational Study of the Independent Football Magazine Market. Communication & Sport. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519878674 Roberts, C. (2012). Identifying and defining values in media codes of ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 27(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2012.669289 Rodríguez-Martínez, R., López-Meri, A., Merino-Arribas, A., & Mauri-Ríos, M. (2017). Instrumentos de rendición de cuentas en España. Análisis comparativo en Cataluña, Galicia, Madrid y Valencia. El Profesional de la Información, 26 (2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.mar.12 Rodríguez-Martínez, R., Mauri-Ríos, M., & Fedele, M. (2017). Criticism as an accountability instrument: the opinion of Spanish journalists. Communication & Society, 30(1): 57–72. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.30.1.57-72 Rojas-Torrijos, J. L., & Ramon, X. (2017). Accountability in social networks. Ever-evolving stylebooks and feedback through Twitter. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 72, 915–941. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1200-50en Seoane, M.C., & Sueiro, S. (2004). Una historia de El País y del Grupo Prisa. De una aventura incierta a una gran industria cultural. Barcelona: Plaza y Janés. Serazio, M. (2019). The other “fake” news: Professional ideals and objectivity ambitions in brand journalism. Journalism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919829923 Schmitz, A. (2015). The digital and social media journalist: A comparative analysis of journalists in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. The International Communication Gazette, 77(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048514556985 Singer, J.B. (2013). The ethical implications of an elite press. Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 28(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2013.802163 Spiller, R., Degen, M., Kronewald, E., & Guertler, K. (2016). Media watchblogs as an instrument of media accountability: An international survey. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 5(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms.5.2.151_1 Suárez-Villegas, J.C., Zuberogoitia, A., & Gostín, A. (2019). Instrumentos de rendición de cuentas externos a los medios: los casos de Andalucía y la CAPV. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 25(1), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.5209/ESMP.63744 Torres da Silva, M. (2012). Newsroom practices and letters-to-the-editor. Journalism Practice, 6(2), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.629124 Traber, M. (1997). Conclusion: an Ethics of communication worthy of human beings. En C. Christians & M. Traber (Eds.), Communication ethics and universal values (pp. 327–343). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. Van Dalen, A., & Deuze, M. (2006). Readers’ advocates or newspapers’ ambassadors? European Journal of Communication, 21(4), 457–475. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323106070011 Van der Wurff, R., & Schönbach, K. (2014). Audience Expectations of Media Accountability in the Netherlands. Journalism Studies, 15(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.801679 Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2002). Understanding the Conditions for Public Discourse: four rules for selecting letters to the editor. Journalism Studies, 3(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700120107347 Waisbord, S. (2019). The vulnerabilities of journalism. Journalism, 20(1), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918809283 Weischenberg, S., Malik, M., & Scholl, A. (2006). Journalismus in Deutschland. Media Perspektiven, 7, 346–361. Wilkins, L., & Brennen, B. (2004). Conflicted interests, contested terrain: journalism ethics codes then and now. Journalism Studies, 5(3), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670042000246061 Zelizer, B. (2018). Epilogue: Timing the study of news temporality. Journalism, 19(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916688964 Zuberogoitia, A., Bidegain, E., & Gostín, A. (2019). Mapping media accountability in a stateless nation: The case of the Basque Country. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 11, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs.11.1.59_1 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2020 Revista de Comunicación http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2020 Revista de Comunicación http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml text/html |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Comunicación; Vol 19 No 1 (2020); 221-241 Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2020); 221-241 2227-1465 1684-0933 reponame:Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación instname:Universidad de Piura instacron:UDEP |
| reponame_str |
Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación |
| collection |
Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Piura |
| instacron_str |
UDEP |
| institution |
UDEP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
-
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mail@mail.com |
| _version_ |
1701295319834165248 |
| spelling |
In-house media accountability instruments: Spanish journalists' and citizens' perceptionsInstrumentos de rendición de cuentas impulsados por los medios de comunicación: percepción de los periodistas y ciudadanos españolesRamon, XavierMauri-Ríos, MarcelDíaz-Campo, JesúsIn a context characterized by structural transformations and the credibility crisis of journalism, media accountability is of outmost importance. Focusing on the Spanish context, this article examines journalists’ and citizens’ perceptions of in-house accountability instruments. To do so, an online survey was administered to Spanish journalists, six citizen focus groups were established and 19 in-depth interviews were conducted with experts and representatives from professional associations. The results reveal that journalists’ evaluation of media accountability instruments is modest. From the citizens’ perspective, the lack of visibility and relative distrust toward these instruments are highlighted. With the goal of stimulating the debate and decision-making, an open access platform has been built to evaluate if media organizations have developed these fundamental instruments to promote transparency, self-regulation and participation. En un contexto caracterizado por transformaciones estructurales y la crisis de credibilidad del periodismo, la rendición de cuentas de los medios adquiere una importancia central. Focalizándose en el contexto español, este artículo examina las percepciones de los periodistas y los ciudadanos sobre los mecanismos de accountability impulsados por los medios. Para ello se administró una encuesta online a periodistas, se celebraron seis grupos de discusión con ciudadanos y se realizaron 19 entrevistas en profundidad con expertos y representantes de asociaciones profesionales. Los resultados revelan la modesta evaluación que los periodistas hacen de estos instrumentos. Desde la perspectiva ciudadana, se subraya la falta de visibilidad y relativa desconfianza respecto estos mecanismos. Con el objetivo de incentivar la reflexión y la posterior toma de decisiones, se ha diseñado una plataforma open access que permite evaluar si los medios disponen de estos instrumentos clave para fomentar la transparencia, la autorregulación y la participación.Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación2020-03-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticle evaluated by pairstextArtículo evaluado por parestextoapplication/pdfapplication/xmltext/htmlhttps://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/164810.26441/RC19.1-2020-A13Revista de Comunicación; Vol 19 No 1 (2020); 221-241Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2020); 221-2412227-14651684-0933reponame:Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicacióninstname:Universidad de Piurainstacron:UDEPspahttps://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1648/1360https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1648/1497https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1648/1524/*ref*/Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211 Almiron, N., Narberhaus, M., & Mauri-Ríos, M. (2016). Mapping media accountability in stateless nations: the case of Catalonia. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 8(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/ 10.1386/cjcs.8.2.207_1 Alsius, S. (1999). Codis ètics del periodisme televisiu. Barcelona: Pòrtic. Alsius, S. (Ed.) (2010). The ethical values of journalists. Field research among media professionals in Catalonia. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Alsius, S., Rodríguez-Martínez, R., & Mauri-Ríos, M. (2018). New formats and old crisis. En T. Eberwein, S. Fengler, & M. Karmasin (Eds.), The European Handbook of Media Accountability (pp. 243–250). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Aznar, H. (1999). Ética y periodismo. Barcelona: Paidós. Aznar, H., & Serrano-Moreno, J. (2017). Autorregulación de la comunicación: análisis de las cien primeras resoluciones de la Comisión de Arbitraje, Quejas y Deontología de la FAPE. El Profesional de la Información, 26(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.mar.04 Bertrand, C. J. (2018). Media ethics and accountability systems. New York: Routledge. Bjerke, P. (2018). Norway: Journalistic power limits media accountability. En T. Eberwein, S. Fengler, & M. Karmasin (Eds.), The European Handbook of Media Accountability (pp. 180–189). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Bovens, M., Goodin, R.E., & T. Schillemans (2014). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Broersma, M. (2019). The legitimacy paradox. Journalism, 20(1), 92–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918806736 Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5a ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Campos-Domínguez, E., & Redondo-García, M. (2015). Meta periodismo y transparencia informativa en el periodismo del siglo XXI. Obets. Revista de ciencias sociales, 10(1), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2015.10.1.07 Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R.A. (2009). Normative theories of the media. Journalism in democratic societies. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Conboy, M. (2014). Celebrity journalism – an oxymoron? Forms and functions of a genre. Journalism, 15(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913488722 Craft, S., Vos, T., & Wolfgang, J. D. (2015). Reader comments as press criticism: Implications for the journalistic field. Journalism, 17(6), 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915579332 Culver, K. B. (2017). Disengaged ethics: Code development and journalism’s relationship with “the public”. Journalism Practice, 11(4), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1121788 Diakopoulos, N., & Koliska, M. (2017). Algorithmic transparency in the news media. Digital Journalism, 5(7), 809–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1208053 Díaz-Campo, J., & Segado-Boj, F. (2015). Journalism ethics in a digital environment: how journalistic codes of ethics have been adapted to the Internet and ICTs in countries around the world. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 735–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.03.004 Eberwein, T., Fengler, S., Philipp, S., & Ille, M. (2014). Counting Media Accountability – the Concept and Methodology of the MediaAcT Survey. En S. Fengler, T. Eberwein, G. Mazzoleni, C. Porlezza, & S. Russ-Mohl (Eds.), Journalists and media accountability. An international study of news people in the digital age (pp: 65–79). Nueva York: Peter Lang. Eberwein, T., Fengler, S., Lauk, E., & Leppik-Bork, T. (Eds.) (2011). Mapping media accountability – in Europe and beyond. Colonia: Helbert Von Halem Verlag. English, P. (2016). Mapping the sports journalism field: Bourdieu and broadsheet newsrooms. Journalism, 17(8), 1001–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915576728 Fengler, S. (2012). Holding the news media accountable: a study of media reporters and media critics in the United States. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(4), 818–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000405 Fengler, S., Eberwein, T., Mazzoleni, G., Porlezza, C., & Russ-Mohl, S. (2014). Journalists and media accountability. An international study of news people in the digital age. Nueva York: Peter Lang. Fengler, S., Eberwein, T., Alsius, S., Baisnée, O., Bichler, K., Dobek-Ostrowska, B., & Zambrano, S. (2015). How effective is media self-regulation? Results from a comparative survey on European journalists. European Journal of Communication, 30(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114561009 Ferruci, P. (2018). It is in the numbers: How market orientation impacts journalists’ use of news metrics. Journalism, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807056 Ferruci, P. (2019). The End of Ombudsmen? 21st-Century Journalism and Reader Representatives. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018805986 García-Avilés, J.A. (2019). Examining media accountability in online media and the role of active audiences. En T. Eberwein, S. Fengler, & Karmasin, M. (Eds.), Media accountability in the era of post-truth politics: European challenges and perspectives (pp. 270–283). Londres: Routledge. Gutiérrez del Álamo, P. (2015). El defensor del lector de El País (1985-2010). Una experiencia pionera en España. Málaga: Universidad de Málaga. Hallin, D.C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hameleers, M., & van der Meer, T. (2019). Misinformation and polarization in a high-choice media environment: How effective are political fact-checkers? Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218819671 Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the Nexus: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Trust in the Press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695 Harro-Loit, H. (2015). Journalists’ views about accountability to different societal groups. Journal of Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 30(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2014.985296 Haydon, G. (1978). On being responsible. The Philosophical Quarterly, 28(110), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2219043 Higgins Joyce, V., Saldaña, M., Schmitz, A., & Alves, R.C. (2017). Ethical perspectives in Latin America’s journalism community: A comparative analysis of acceptance of controversial practice for investigative reporting. International Communication Gazette, 79(5), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048516688131 Himelboim, I., & Limor, Y. (2011). Media Institutions, News Organizations, and the Journalistic Social Role Worldwide: A Cross-National and Cross-Organizational Study of Codes of Ethics. Mass Communication & Society, 14(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903359719 Hodges, L.W. (1986). Defining press responsibility: a functional approach. En D. Elliot (Ed.), Responsible journalism (pp. 13–31). Beverly Hills, California: Sage. Hutchins, B., & Boyle, R. (2017). A community of practice: Sport journalism, mobile media and institutional change. Digital Journalism, 5(5), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1234147 Joseph, N. L. (2011). Correcting the record. Journalism Practice, 5(6): 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.587670 Justel, S., Micó, J.L., & Ordeix, E. (2018). Governing the Media: Web Analytics in Spanish Newsrooms. Trípodos, 42, 93–106. Karlsson, M., Clerwall, C., & Nord, L. (2017). Do not stand corrected. Transparency and users’ attitudes to inaccurate news and corrections in online journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654680 Karmasin, M., Kraus, D., Kaltenbrunner, A., & Bichler, K. (2014). Media Ethics as Institutional Ethics – the Potential of Corporate Social Responsibility. En S. Fengler, T. Eberwein, G. Mazzoleni, C. Porlezza & S. Russ-Mohl (Eds.), Journalists and Media Accountability. An International Study of News People in the Digital Age (pp: 231–248). Nueva York: Peter Lang. Kendall, M., & Gibbons, J.D. (1990). Rank Correlation Methods. Charles Griffin Book Series (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Luengo, M., Maciá-Barber, C., & Requejo-Alemán, J.L. (2017). Evaluating organisational ethics in Spanish news media. Journalism, 18(9), 1142–1162. Maciá, C. (2006). La figura del defensor del lector, del oyente y del telespectador. Madrid: Universitas. Mauri-Ríos, M., & Ramon, X. (2015). Nuevos sistemas de rendición de cuentas de la información periodística. Una exploración del escenario online español. El Profesional de la Información, 24(4), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.jul.04 Mauri-Ríos, M., Rodríguez-Martínez, R., Figueras-Maz, M., & Fedele, M. (2018). Press councils as a traditional instrument of media self-regulation: The perceptions of European journalists. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 7(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms.7.2.221_1 Mayes, I. (2004). Trust Me – I’m an ombudsman. British Journalism Review, 15(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956474804046018 McQuail, D. (1997). Accountability of media to society. Principles and means. European Journal of Communication, 12(4), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323197012004004 McQuail, D. (2003). Media Accountability and Freedom of Publication. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. Meltzer, K., & Martik, E. (2017). Journalists as communities of practice. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 41(3), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859917706158 Neveu, E. (2019). The challenge of thinking ecologically. Journalism, 20(1), 198–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918808139 Nolan, D., & Marjoribanks, T. (2011). Public editors and media governance at The Guardian and The New York Times. Journalism Practice, 5(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2010.482764 Pastor, L. (2010). Teoría de las cartas al director. La gestión periodística del público. Barcelona: UOC. Plaisance, P.L. (2000). The concept of media accountability reconsidered. Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 15(4), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327728JMME1504_5 Raeymaeckers, K. (2005). Letters to the Editor: A Feedback Opportunity Turned into a Marketing Tool. European Journal of Communication, 20(2), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105052298 Ramon, X., Mauri-Ríos, M., & Alcalá-Anguiano, F. (2016). Transparencia informativa, autorregulación y participación del público. Comunicación y Sociedad, 25, 101–125. Ramon, X., Billings, A. C., & Rojas-Torrijos, J. L. (2019). Interviews with Former ESPN Ombudsmen / Public Editors Kelly McBride, Robert Lipsyte, and Jim Brady. International Journal of Sport Communication, 12(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2018-0127 Ramon, X., & Tulloch, C. (2019). Life Beyond Clickbait Journalism: A Transnational Study of the Independent Football Magazine Market. Communication & Sport. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519878674 Roberts, C. (2012). Identifying and defining values in media codes of ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 27(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2012.669289 Rodríguez-Martínez, R., López-Meri, A., Merino-Arribas, A., & Mauri-Ríos, M. (2017). Instrumentos de rendición de cuentas en España. Análisis comparativo en Cataluña, Galicia, Madrid y Valencia. El Profesional de la Información, 26 (2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.mar.12 Rodríguez-Martínez, R., Mauri-Ríos, M., & Fedele, M. (2017). Criticism as an accountability instrument: the opinion of Spanish journalists. Communication & Society, 30(1): 57–72. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.30.1.57-72 Rojas-Torrijos, J. L., & Ramon, X. (2017). Accountability in social networks. Ever-evolving stylebooks and feedback through Twitter. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 72, 915–941. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1200-50en Seoane, M.C., & Sueiro, S. (2004). Una historia de El País y del Grupo Prisa. De una aventura incierta a una gran industria cultural. Barcelona: Plaza y Janés. Serazio, M. (2019). The other “fake” news: Professional ideals and objectivity ambitions in brand journalism. Journalism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919829923 Schmitz, A. (2015). The digital and social media journalist: A comparative analysis of journalists in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. The International Communication Gazette, 77(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048514556985 Singer, J.B. (2013). The ethical implications of an elite press. Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 28(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2013.802163 Spiller, R., Degen, M., Kronewald, E., & Guertler, K. (2016). Media watchblogs as an instrument of media accountability: An international survey. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 5(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms.5.2.151_1 Suárez-Villegas, J.C., Zuberogoitia, A., & Gostín, A. (2019). Instrumentos de rendición de cuentas externos a los medios: los casos de Andalucía y la CAPV. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 25(1), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.5209/ESMP.63744 Torres da Silva, M. (2012). Newsroom practices and letters-to-the-editor. Journalism Practice, 6(2), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.629124 Traber, M. (1997). Conclusion: an Ethics of communication worthy of human beings. En C. Christians & M. Traber (Eds.), Communication ethics and universal values (pp. 327–343). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. Van Dalen, A., & Deuze, M. (2006). Readers’ advocates or newspapers’ ambassadors? European Journal of Communication, 21(4), 457–475. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323106070011 Van der Wurff, R., & Schönbach, K. (2014). Audience Expectations of Media Accountability in the Netherlands. Journalism Studies, 15(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.801679 Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2002). Understanding the Conditions for Public Discourse: four rules for selecting letters to the editor. Journalism Studies, 3(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700120107347 Waisbord, S. (2019). The vulnerabilities of journalism. Journalism, 20(1), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918809283 Weischenberg, S., Malik, M., & Scholl, A. (2006). Journalismus in Deutschland. Media Perspektiven, 7, 346–361. Wilkins, L., & Brennen, B. (2004). Conflicted interests, contested terrain: journalism ethics codes then and now. Journalism Studies, 5(3), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670042000246061 Zelizer, B. (2018). Epilogue: Timing the study of news temporality. Journalism, 19(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916688964 Zuberogoitia, A., Bidegain, E., & Gostín, A. (2019). Mapping media accountability in a stateless nation: The case of the Basque Country. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 11, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs.11.1.59_1Derechos de autor 2020 Revista de Comunicaciónhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-31T17:20:13Zmail@mail.com - |
| score |
13.971837 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
