A través de este trabajo de investigación, el autor analizará las garantías procesales peruanas y españolas que involucran el acto de emplazar la demanda al domicilio legal del demandado. Para ello, se explicarán las razones por las que no resulta válido emplazar al demandado mediante aplicativo WhatsApp y/o un correo electrónico. Para estos efectos, se analizará las garantías que involucran el acto de emplazar la demanda, las cuales van más allá de la garantía de que el demandado tome conocimiento.

In this paper, the author analyzes the Peruvian and Spain procedural guarantees that involve the act of serving the lawsuit at the defendant’s legal domicile. It explains the reasons why the defendant cannot be summoned to the WhatsApp application or to an-email. For the purposes, the guarantees that involve the act of serving the claim at the defendant will be analyzed, which go beyond the guaranteeing that the defendant becomes aware of the claim.

In this paper, the author analyzes the Peruvian and Spain procedural guarantees that involve the act of serving the lawsuit at the defendant’s legal domicile. It explains the reasons why the defendant cannot be summoned to the WhatsApp application or to an-email. For the purposes, the guarantees that involve the act of serving the claim at the defendant will be analyzed, which go beyond the guaranteeing that the defendant becomes aware of the claim.

In this academic work, the authors look into the foundations and limitations of the iura novit curia principle in the Peruvian civil procedure, in order to give practical responses to the main challenges faced by judges in its application. Moreover, they explain that a good understanding of such principle should not permit a judge to submit a judgment based on legal causes that were not duly invoked and defined by the claimant, or that have not been discussed by the parties during the procedure. Finally, they propose that the application of the iura novit curia principle does not allow judges to render a “surprise decision” based on a legal argument that was not part of the controversy in the procedure.

El artículo analiza la tutela jurisdiccional efectiva en el proceso contencioso administrativo peruano, centrándose en un nuevo precedente vinculante de la Corte Suprema de Justicia. Para dicho fin, se abordan problemas y soluciones, como la igualdad de regulaciones sectoriales y la prohibición de incorporar argumentos de derecho distintos en sede administrativa. Se destaca la importancia de interpretar el proceso contencioso administrativo para efectivizar los derechos de los administrados. Se enfatiza el deber de los jueces de garantizar el debido procedimiento administrativo y se propone una interpretación sistemática de la limitación de presentación de medios probatorios.

The article analyzes the effective judicial protection in the Peruvian administrative litigation process, focusing on a new binding precedent from the Supreme Court of Justice. To that end, problems and solutions are addressed, such as the equality of sectoral regulations and the prohibition of incorporating different legal arguments in the administrative sphere. The importance of interpreting the administrative litigation process to enforce the rights of the administrators is highlighted. The duty of judges to guarantee due administrative procedure is emphasized, and a systematic interpretation of the limitation on the presentation of evidence is proposed.

In this academic work, the authors look into the foundations and limitations of the iura novit curia principle in the Peruvian civil procedure, in order to give practical responses to the main challenges faced by judges in its application. Moreover, they explain that a good understanding of such principle should not permit a judge to submit a judgment based on legal causes that were not duly invoked and defined by the claimant, or that have not been discussed by the parties during the procedure. Finally, they propose that the application of the iura novit curia principle does not allow judges to render a “surprise decision” based on a legal argument that was not part of the controversy in the procedure.

A través de este artículo académico, los autores desarrollan el fundamento y límites del principio de iura novit curia en el proceso civil peruano, a efectos de poder dar respuestas prácticas a los principales problemas que conlleva su aplicación por parte del juez. Así, explican por qué un adecuado entendimiento del principio iura novit curia no puede conllevar a que el juez emita sentencias en base a causales jurídicas que no han sido debidamente delimitadas en la demanda, y que hayan constituido materia de debate por las partes en el proceso. Finalmente, señalan por qué la aplicación del principio iura novit curia no permite que el juez pueda emitir fallos sorpresas, es decir, aquellos basados en fundamentación jurídica que no ha sido parte de la controversia en el proceso.

In this academic work, the authors look into the foundations and limitations of the iura novit curia principle in the Peruvian civil procedure, in order to give practical responses to the main challenges faced by judges in its application. Moreover, they explain that a good understanding of such principle should not permit a judge to submit a judgment based on legal causes that were not duly invoked and defined by the claimant, or that have not been discussed by the parties during the procedure. Finally, they propose that the application of the iura novit curia principle does not allow judges to render a “surprise decision” based on a legal argument that was not part of the controversy in the procedure.

El artículo analiza la tutela jurisdiccional efectiva en el proceso contencioso administrativo peruano, centrándose en un nuevo precedente vinculante de la Corte Suprema de Justicia. Para dicho fin, se abordan problemas y soluciones, como la igualdad de regulaciones sectoriales y la prohibición de incorporar argumentos de derecho distintos en sede administrativa. Se destaca la importancia de interpretar el proceso contencioso administrativo para efectivizar los derechos de los administrados. Se enfatiza el deber de los jueces de garantizar el debido procedimiento administrativo y se propone una interpretación sistemática de la limitación de presentación de medios probatorios.

In this academic work, the authors look into the foundations and limitations of the iura novit curia principle in the Peruvian civil procedure, in order to give practical responses to the main challenges faced by judges in its application. Moreover, they explain that a good understanding of such principle should not permit a judge to submit a judgment based on legal causes that were not duly invoked and defined by the claimant, or that have not been discussed by the parties during the procedure. Finally, they propose that the application of the iura novit curia principle does not allow judges to render a “surprise decision” based on a legal argument that was not part of the controversy in the procedure.