Peru is a diverse country, and traditional knowledge (TK) is found within this diversity. TK is an intellectual product and is part of the identity (culture and values) and the sustainable development of indigenous communities. Based on them, it is possible to generate advances in different sciences, such as medicine and other technologies. However, there is a latent risk of illicit appropriation of this type of knowledge in order to block communities’ access to their own intellectual production (inherent to them). In that sense, the present academic work will focus on studying the way in which the protection of TK is proposed in Peru, analyzing its effectiveness and deficiencies. Likewise, new measures will be proposed for the purpose of complementing and improving the system.

Peru is a diverse country, and traditional knowledge (TK) is found within this diversity. TK is an intellectual product and is part of the identity (culture and values) and the sustainable development of indigenous communities. Based on them, it is possible to generate advances in different sciences, such as medicine and other technologies. However, there is a latent risk of illicit appropriation of this type of knowledge in order to block communities’ access to their own intellectual production (inherent to them). In that sense, the present academic work will focus on studying the way in which the protection of TK is proposed in Peru, analyzing its effectiveness and deficiencies. Likewise, new measures will be proposed for the purpose of complementing and improving the system.

Peru is a diverse country, and traditional knowledge (TK) is found within this diversity. TK is an intellectual product and is part of the identity (culture and values) and the sustainable development of indigenous communities. Based on them, it is possible to generate advances in different sciences, such as medicine and other technologies. However, there is a latent risk of illicit appropriation of this type of knowledge in order to block communities’ access to their own intellectual production (inherent to them). In that sense, the present academic work will focus on studying the way in which the protection of TK is proposed in Peru, analyzing its effectiveness and deficiencies. Likewise, new measures will be proposed for the purpose of complementing and improving the system.

The arrival of the Fast-Track Insolvency Refinancing Procedure (PARC for its initials in spanish) was not fortuitous. In order to face the global health crisis, the Peruvian government not only has been taking exceptional actions related to the sanitary system, but also has been concerned about the businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Likewise, this procedure has been created as a complementary action, with the purpose of refinancing the obligations of the companies that suffered the effects of the pandemic. Furthermore, as the first entirely virtual fast- track procedure, and also because of its development in a shorter time compared to the other existing procedures in Perú, the PARC is unique.Due to these advantages, this article will try to explain why the PARC should not only be valid until December 31st, 2020. The continuity of this procedure in the post-pandemic stage is ...

La creación del Procedimiento Acelerado de Refinanciación Concursal (PARC) no ha sido fortuita. Ante una crisis sanitaria mundial, el Gobierno peruano no solo ha tenido que adoptar medidas excepcionales respecto al sector sanitario, sino también en referencia al sector empresarial. Es así que este procedimiento nace como una medida complementaria para refinanciar las obligaciones de las empresas afectadas por la pandemia del COVID-19 y evitar la quiebra de las mismas. Además, al presentarse como el primer procedimiento concursal enteramente virtual, y por desarrollarse en un período de tiempo menor en comparación a los dos procedimientos ya existentes en nuestro país, se convierte en el único con estas singulares características. Debido a estos factores, el presente trabajo tratará de explicar por qué el PARC no solo debería cumplir su vigencia hasta el 31 de diciembre de 20...

The arrival of the Fast-Track Insolvency Refinancing Procedure (PARC for its initials in spanish) was not fortuitous. In order to face the global health crisis, the Peruvian government not only has been taking exceptional actions related to the sanitary system, but also has been concerned about the businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Likewise, this procedure has been created as a complementary action, with the purpose of refinancing the obligations of the companies that suffered the effects of the pandemic. Furthermore, as the first entirely virtual fast- track procedure, and also because of its development in a shorter time compared to the other existing procedures in Perú, the PARC is unique.Due to these advantages, this article will try to explain why the PARC should not only be valid until December 31st, 2020. The continuity of this procedure in the post-pandemic stage is ...