This article has carried out a legal-normative analysis on the ability of people with Down Syndrome to express their willingness in case of organ donation in Peru, a work that opens the legal possibility of acceptance of the consent conferred by the giver with Down syndrome. For such a comet, a joint study of Peruvian legislation and international human rights treaties ratified by Peru has been carried out, which promotes an interest in respecting the autonomy of people with some type of disability.

This article has carried out a reflection about the phenomenon of football today, analyzing no just like a sport activity, but as a global show and as one of the industries that circulates the most money. In the middle of that context, we did emphasis on the situation of the elite footballers, who, due to the mercantilist vision proposed by several sports institutions, are seen as the

This article presents an analysis of some characteristics of postmodern thought, which have ended up influencing various bioethical and bio-legal dilemmas, such as abortion or euthanasia, among others. Thus, it is determined that many of the current positions, both in doctrine and in jurisprudence around these issues, have been the result of this current of thought, which, among other things, proposes the relativization of some fundamental rights, such as the life and freedom.

The process of constitutionalization of law, more precisely of civil law, has caused a series of positive changes for the protection of fundamental rights; however, it is necessary to mention that, prior to this step, a "civilization" of constitutional law had to be carried out, that is, a progressive incorporation of some figures of private law in the Constitution in order to protect the interests of people. In that way, the present study seeks to vindicate the civil origins of the protection of the person and their interests, making a historical review from the phenomenon of codification to how the current Civil Code of 1984 protects, within the civil jurisdiction, the protection of person.

En la actualidad, el fenómeno deportivo ha pasado a ser uno de los mayores generadores de recursos económicos del mundo. Esto ha llevado a que, cada vez con mayor intensidad, diversos clubes e instituciones deportivas busquen diversas estrategias para aumentar sus ganancias: más contratos con patrocinadores, más mercadería ofrecida a los fanáticos, mayores cobros por derechos televisivos, etc. Sin embargo, esto también ha traído como consecuencias negativas para los involucrados, principalmente los deportistas. Es así que muchos de los principales futbolistas del mundo han pasado por un proceso de “cosificación”, en donde, más que personas, son concebidos como productos disponibles para el mercado. Veremos así, la evolución de la práctica deportiva hasta nuestros días, constatando que esta no se busca germinar ciertas virtudes como la disciplina, el trabajo en equipo o...

Currently, in Peru we face numerous scenarios that are beyond the scope of our current regulations. An example of this is the case of assisted reproduction techniques, where the regulations are minimal and not very specific. This means that, in cases where these techniques are used, there is no proper regulation, causing multiple consequences and uncertainties. In this way, and given the legal loophole produced by the absence of a clear rule, many people who resort to these techniques to fulfill their wishes of becoming parents must employ various legal strategies to regularize the situation of minors born through their use, from maternity impugnation processes to adoption judicial processes. This often results in prolonged judicial litigation that affects several fundamental rights of minors, such as the right to know their biological truth, the right to have a stable family, and the ri...

Today, we live in an era where the participation of Artificial Intelligence is already part of our daily lives. Its increasing use compels the legal framework to question the role of such technologies within the legal order. In this context, there is doctrinal uncertainty about whether, due to the autonomy with which it seems to operate, AI should be considered a new type of legal subject. This would imply that AI could exercise various types of subjective legal situations, becoming a decisive part of community life. Ultimately, it is concluded that, despite its novel functions, AI cannot be equated with the condition of a person, which is the foundation of the idea of a legal subject, due to its inability to have feelings or generate private judgments of autonomy, as well as its incapacity to assess its own behavior.